Examples of using This solution would in English and their translations into Slovenian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Official/political
-
Programming
Obviously this solution would also.
Latin or Esperanto is sometimes suggested as the single, pan-European language that the EU should adopt. However,since almost everybody would have to learn either of these from scratch, this solution would be equally hard and not terribly useful in relations with the rest of the world.
I think this solution would be acceptable to all.
A feasibility study on this solution would be useful.
This solution would not require any modification of the Treaties.
Separate system operators without ownership unbundling: This solution would require separation of system operation from ownership of the assets.
This solution would have the advantage of ensuring legal certainty(example 1).
Since almost everybody would have to learn either of these from scratch, this solution would be equally hard and not terribly useful in relations with the rest of the world.
This solution would give individuals greater access to the Community judicature.
Peter Marie, this solution would make the problem go away.
This solution would also strengthen judicial review of the decisions adopted by the Commission.
However, this solution would be completely impractical.
This solution would add undue complexity and thus defies the call for more simple legislation.
For some measures this solution would create appreciable differences of treatment between ships without justification.
This solution would entail a significant and probably disproportionate intrusion in Member States' legislations.
In a context of unstable public finances, this solution would involve steeper reductions of Member States' tax revenues; implementation would be more difficult; and it would be inconsistent with the aim of eliminating the distortions deriving from the difference in scope between the Directive and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive.
This solution would not preclude national structures being used for national and locally established funds.
This solution would be highly flexible, because CRAs would be able to apply the‘comply or explain' principle.
This solution would remove legal fragmentation in the field of contract law and lead to a uniform application and interpretation of the Regulation's provisions.
First of all, this solution would be simple and transparent with respect to all citizens exercising their right of freedom of movement throughout the European Union.
This solution would enable damage suffered by injured parties outside their Member State of residence to be dealt with by procedures familiar to them.
This solution would tackle the underlining roaming problems and allow a sustainable competitive solution to the roaming without the need for long term price regulation.
This solution would make it possible to draw on existing experience such as that of the European Capitals for Culture or the European Union Prize for Cultural Heritage/ Europa Nostra Awards.
This solution would require the implementation of complex cross-licensing systems and a number of content creators could find themselves excluded from the market, as a result, for example, of not using DRM.
For firms this solution would mean a less competitive European economy and thus the loss of many jobs, the scale of which would depend on the role of non-renewable energy sources in the national economies affected.
This solution would also mean that appointments to the Commission would not have to be made in such a complex way in accordance with the nationality key and the European Council would not have to have such complex vote-counting arrangements.
This solution would best address the three objectives: complete prohibition of oestradiol 17β for use in food producing animals, ensuring the availability of treatments for pet animals and the general call for a more simple legislation under the precondition that the existing legal framework is maintained.
This solution would ensure a level playing field within the Community for all market players, instead of a fragmented legal regime for CRAs throughout 27 Member States, which could arise if the EU does not act but keeps the current self-regulatory regime based on the IOSCO Code.
This solution would help establish, to some extent, a common framework, at least concerning the reference criteria that CRAs had to fulfil; however, it could not include an enforcement mechanism and thus would have limited effectiveness in achieving the policy objectives.
Secondly, this solution would significantly limit flexibility without addressing another genuine problem related to mobility: how to take account of supervised professional practice, an aspect of architectural education which is already recognised in many Member States as an important feature of training architects?
