Examples of using Use of videoconferencing in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Facilitating use of videoconferencing.
As with Article 10, Article 17 encourages the use of videoconferencing.
The use of videoconferencing is arranged according to the law of the requesting state.
No costs are charged for the use of videoconferencing.
Urges extensive use of videoconferencing and all related tools in order to significantly cut costs;
Reiterates its call to be informed about the use of videoconferencing facilities in 2014;
This guide covers the use of videoconferencing equipment in cross-border court proceedings in the European Union.
As such, this document can be used as a basis for the use of videoconferencing in other procedures.
The use of videoconferencing should be encouraged for meetings, as well as the use of new environmental technologies.
Links to EU legislation andlegislation of the Member States regulating the use of videoconferencing;
What costs apply to the use of videoconferencing and how should they be paid?
The following are suggested as a checklist of practical considerations that encourage best practice in the use of videoconferencing.
The European e-Justice action plan lists“Better use of videoconferencing” as one of the projects on which work should continue in 2009-2013.
Article 10(4) of Council Regulation(EC) No 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil orcommercial matters provides for the right to request the use of videoconferencing.
Several instruments adopted at European level provide for the use of videoconferencing during judicial proceedings25.
We increasingly make use of videoconferencing and other information technology, such as secure data and document-sharing, to interact with our auditees. 14.
In civil matters,the 2001 Taking of Evidence Regulation provides for two possibilities for the use of videoconferencing in cross-border taking of evidence.
In order to promote and facilitate the use of videoconferencing in cross-border proceedings, work has already been done on an information booklet and a draft manual is being prepared.
In the framework of European e-Justice, the Member States of the EUhave agreed to work together to promote the use of videoconferencing and to exchange experience and best practices.
Further scope for the use of videoconferencing in the EU context can be found in the Council Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims.
In the framework of European e-Justice, the Member States of the EUhave agreed to work together to promote the use of videoconferencing and to exchange experience and best practices.
Similarly, the Commission has always encouraged the use of videoconferencing and the electronic transmission of acts between legal authorities and is actively involved in efforts to interconnect criminal records.
The mutual assistance instruments and their protocols cover mutual assistance in general but also contain rules on specific forms of mutual assistance such as the interception of telecommunications or the use of videoconferencing.
When the Commission issued a recommendation that EU countries' law authorities improve their use of videoconferencing to help judicial services work better across borders, this did not have any legal consequences.
This booklet covers the use of videoconferencing in legal proceedings, primarily in courts using a separate facility(e.g. witness room) or another method(e.g. mobile or portable equipment or a studio).
The thematic meeting on return, readmission and reintegration organised in Brussels in 2016 proposed,among other things, the use of videoconferencing for identification or pre-identification, more systematic use of fingerprints, or recourse to joint actions for complex cases.
Where required by the national law of the requesting Member State, the use of videoconferencing or any other appropriate means of distance communication shall be subject to the consent of the person to be heard.
The thematic meeting on return, readmission and reintegration organised in Brussels in 2016 proposed,among other things, the use of videoconferencing for identification or pre-identification, more systematic use of fingerprints, or recourse to joint actions for complex cases.