What is the translation of " APPLICATION OF THE EXCEPTION " in Slovenian?

• uporabo izjeme
• uporaba izjeme
• uporabe izjeme

Examples of using Application of the exception in English and their translations into Slovenian

The application of the exception rule of Article 101(3) is subject to four cumulative conditions, two positive and two negative:.
Uporaba pravila o izjemi iz člena 101(3) je odvisna od štirih skupnih pogojev, dveh pozitivnih in dveh negativnih:.

In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences.
Zlasti bi se države članice lahko odločile, da uporabo izjeme ali omejitve v celoti ali delno pogojujejo z razpoložljivostjo ustreznih licenc.

Those measures should not exceed what is necessary to pursue the objective of ensuring the security and integrity of the system and should not undermine the effective application of the exception.
Ti ukrepi ne bi smeli presegati tistega, kar je potrebno za zagotovitev varnosti in celovitosti sistema, in ne bi smeli ogroziti učinkovite uporabe izjeme.

Whereas the application of the exception for the protection of international relations applies as stated in paragraph 19 of In‘t Veld v Council(T-529/09);
Ker uporaba izjeme za varovanje mednarodnih odnosov velja, kot je zapisano v odstavku 19 zadeve In‘t Veld proti Svetu(T-529/09);

The proposed amendment is needed in order to provide legal certainty in cases when a Member State decides to subject the application of the exception to the availability of adequate licences.
Predlog spremembe je potreben, da se zagotovi pravna varnost v primerih, ko se država članica odloči, da bo uporaba izjeme odvisna od razpoložljivosti ustreznih licenc.

Expresses concern at the routine application of the exception for the protection of international relations as a justification for the classification of documents;
Izraža zaskrbljenost nad rutinsko uporabo izjeme za varovanje mednarodnih odnosov kot utemeljitve za dodeljevanje kategorij zaupnosti dokumentom;

Those measures should not exceed what is necessary to pursue the objective of ensuring the security and integrity of the system and should not undermine the effective application of the exception.
Ti ukrepinaj bodo sorazmerni in naj ne presegajo tistega, kar je potrebno za zagotovitev varnosti in celovitosti sistema, in ne bi smeli ogroziti učinkovite uporabe izjeme.

That finding is supported by the argument based on the requirement that Member States be consistent in the application of the exceptions which bind them, as set out in the last sentence of recital 32 in the preamble to Directive 2001/29.
Ta ugotovitev je podprta z argumentom, ki se nanaša na zahtevo po koherentnosti, ki velja za države članice pri uporabi izjem, ki jih zavezujejo, kot je razvidno iz zadnjega stavka uvodne izjave 32 Direktive 2001/29.

Those measures should not exceed what is necessary to pursue the objective of ensuring the security and integrity of the system and should not undermine the effective application of the exception.
Ti ukrepi bi morali ostati sorazmerni z zadevnimi tveganji in ne bi smeli presegati tistega, kar je potrebno za zagotovitev varnosti in celovitosti sistema, in ne bi smeli ogroziti učinkovite uporabe izjeme.

In particular, Member States could decide to subject the application of the exception or limitation, fully or partially, to the availability of adequate licences, cove ring at least the same uses as those allowed under the exception..
Zlasti bi se države članice lahko odločile, da uporabo izjeme ali omejitve v celoti ali delno pogojujejo z razpoložljivostjo ustreznih licenc, ki zajemajo najmanj enake načine uporabe kakor tiste, ki so dovoljeni na podlagi izjeme ali omejitve.

Those measures should remain proportionate to the risks involved, and should not exceed what is necessary to pursue the objective of ensuring the security and integrity of the system and should not undermine the effective application of the exception.
Ti ukrepinaj bodo sorazmerni in naj ne presegajo tistega, kar je potrebno za zagotovitev varnosti in celovitosti sistema, in ne bi smeli ogroziti učinkovite uporabe izjeme.

In paragraph 76 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court stated that the preliminary nature of the discussions does not, in itself, justify application of the exception provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001.
Splošno sodišče je namreč v točki 76 te sodbe pojasnilo, da sama predhodnost razprav ni omogočila upravičiti uporabe izjeme, ki jo določa člen 4(3), prvi pododstavek, Uredbe št. 1049/2001.

In order to guarantee legal certainty when a Member State decides to subject the application of the exception to the availability of adequate licences, it is necessary to specify under which conditions an educational establishment may use protected works or other subject-matter under that exception and, conversely, when it should act under a licensing scheme.
(17a) Če se država članica odloči, da bo uporaba izjeme odvisna od razpoložljivosti ustreznih licenc, je treba za zagotovitev pravne varnosti določiti, pod kakšnimi pogoji lahko izobraževalna ustanova uporablja zaščitena dela ali drug predmet urejanja v okviru te izjeme in kdaj bi morala delovati v okviru sheme licenciranja.

Those measures should not exceed what is necessary, proportionate and effective to pursue the objective of ensuring the security of the system and should not undermine the effective application of the exception or impede the reproducibility of research results.
Ti ukrepi ne bi smeli presegati tistega, kar je potrebno, sorazmerno in učinkovito za zagotovitev varnosti sistema, in ne bi smeli ogroziti učinkovite uporabe izjeme ali ovirati ponovljivosti rezultatov raziskav.

According to the General Court, the preliminary nature of the discussions does not, in itself, justify application of the exception provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001, as that provision does not make a distinction according to the state of progress of the discussions.
Splošno sodišče je menilo, da sam predhodni značaj razprav ne upravičuje uporabe izjeme, ki jo določa člen 4(3), prvi pododstavek, Uredbe št. 1049/2001, saj ta določba namreč ne razlikuje med fazami razprav.

In any event, as the General Court found in paragraph 76 of the judgment under appeal, there is no reference in the first subparagraph of Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 to the stage of the negotiations as a criterion to be taken into account in order to justify application of the exception to the right of access.
Kot naj bi odločilo Splošno sodišče v točki 76 izpodbijane sodbe, naj člen 4(3), prvi pododstavek, Uredbe št. 1049/2001 nikakor ne bi omenjal faze pogajanj kot merila, ki se ga upošteva pri utemeljevanju uporabe izjeme od pravice do dostopa.

Recital 42 refers to the non-commercial nature of teaching and scientific research as the determining criterion for the application of the exception, irrespective of the organizational structure and the means of funding of the institution where these activities are undertaken.
Uvodna izjava 42 se nanaša na nekomercialni značaj pouka in znanstvenega raziskovanja, ki je odločilno merilo za uporabo te izjeme, ne glede na organizacijsko strukturo in način financiranja ustanove, v kateri take dejavnosti potekajo.

Such application of the exception would allow the holder of a certificate that has been granted, but that has not yet taken effect by the date of the entry into force of this Regulation, a reasonable period of transition to adapt to the changed legal context, while at the same time ensuring that makers of generics and biosimilars can benefit effectively, without excessive delay, from the exception..
Takšna uporaba izjeme bi imetniku certifikata, ki je bil podeljen, vendar do datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe še ni začel veljati, omogočila razumen rok za prehod k prilagoditvi na spremenjene pravne okoliščine, obenem pa bi zagotovili, da lahko izdelovalci generičnih in podobnih bioloških zdravil brez pretiranega odlašanja učinkovito izkoristijo izjemo..

In view of the specific nature of the exception, its targeted scope and the need for legal certainty for its beneficiaries, Member States should not be allowed to impose additional requirements for the application of the exception, such as compensation schemes or the prior verification of the commercial availability of accessible format copies.
Državam članicam glede na posebno naravo izjeme, njeno ciljno področje uporabe in potrebo po pravni varnosti za njene upravičence ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno nalaganje dodatnih zahtev za uporabo izjeme, kot so odškodninske sheme ali predhodno preverjanje komercialne razpoložljivosti izvodov v dostopnem formatu.

Along the same line and so that parties can be granted enough time to verify if the conditions for the application of the exception are fulfilled, the Rapporteur also proposes to extend to three months the deadline for the notification to the competent industrial property authority and for informing the SPC holder(recitals 13, Article 4, paragraph 2, points(b) and(ba) new).
Da bi imele stranke na voljo dovolj časa za preverjanje, ali so izpolnjeni pogoji za uporabo izjeme, poročevalec predlaga tudi, da se rok za predložitev obvestila pristojnemu organu za industrijsko lastnino in za obvestilo imetnika dodatnega varstvenega certifikata(uvodna izjava 13 ter točka(b) in nova točka(ba) odstavka 2 člena 4) podaljša na tri mesece.

In view of the specific nature of the exception provided for under this Directive, its specific scope and the need for legal certainty for its beneficiaries, Member States should not be allowed to impose additional requirements for the application of the exception, such as the prior verification of the commercial availability of works in accessible formats.
(11) Državam članicam glede na posebno naravo izjeme, njeno ciljno področje uporabe in potrebo po pravni varnosti za njene upravičence ne bo dovoljeno nalaganje dodatnih zahtev za uporabo izjeme, kot so odškodninske sheme ali predhodno preverjanje komercialne razpoložljivosti izvodov v dostopnem formatu.

(17a) In order to guarantee legal certainty, in the event that a Member State decides to make the application of the exception subject to the availability of adequate licences, it is necessary to specify under which conditions an educational establishment or an entity certified to carry out teaching activities may use protected works or other subject-matter under the exception and, conversely, when it should act under a licensing scheme.
(17a) Če se država članica odloči, da bo uporaba izjeme odvisna od razpoložljivosti ustreznih licenc, je treba za zagotovitev pravne varnosti določiti, pod kakšnimi pogoji lahko izobraževalna ustanova ali subjekt, ki ima certifikat za izvajanje dejavnosti poučevanja, uporablja zaščitena dela ali druge predmete urejanja v okviru te izjeme in kdaj bi morala delovati v okviru sistema izdaje licenc.

Member States shall provide that all rightholders may, at any time, easily and effectively, exclude▌ their works or other subject matter from the licensing mechanism set out in paragraph 1 or from the application of the exception or limitation provided for in paragraph 2, either in general or in specific cases, including after the conclusion of a licence or after the beginning of the use concerned.
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko vsi imetniki pravic kadar koli, enostavno in učinkovito izključijo ▌svoja dela ali druge predmete varstva iz mehanizma licenciranja iz odstavka 1 ali iz uporabe izjeme ali omejitve iz odstavka 2, bodisi na splošno bodisi v posebnih primerih, vključno po sklenitvi licence ali začetku zadevne uporabe..

In this case, in paragraphs 111 to 120 of the judgment under appeal, the General Court limits the application of the exception under Article 4(1)(b) of that regulation to situations in which privacy or the integrity of the individual would be infringed for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, without taking into account the legislation of the Union concerning the protection of personal data, particularly Regulation No 45/2001.
Splošno sodišče pa je v točkah od 111 do 120 izpodbijane sodbe omejilo uporabo izjeme iz te določbe le na položaje, v katerih bi se posegalo v zasebnost ali integriteto posameznika v smislu člena 8 EKČP in sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, ne da bi se upoštevala zakonodaja Unije o varstvu osebnih podatkov, zlasti Uredba št. 45/2001.

(11) In view of the specific nature of the exception, its targeted scope and the need for legal certainty for its beneficiaries, Member States should not only be allowed to impose additional requirements for the application of the exception to the extent that such requirements support national markets in accessible format copies and are consistent with the three step test, such as compensation schemes or the prior verification of the commercial availability of accessible format copies.
(11) Državam članicam glede na posebno naravo izjeme, njeno ciljno področje uporabe in potrebo po pravni varnosti za njene upravičence ne bi smelo biti dovoljeno nalaganje dodatnih zahtev za uporabo izjeme, kot so odškodninske sheme ali predhodno preverjanje komercialne razpoložljivosti izvodov v dostopnem formatu.

The Court also ruled out any application of the exception derived from express reference to specific provisions of the WTO agreements, after having in particular found in paragraph 142 of the FIAMM judgment and paragraph 135 of the Fedon judgment that‘the preambles to the various regulations amending the banana import regime do not show that the Community legislature referred to specific provisions of the WTO agreements when it purported to bring the regime into conformity with those agreements'.
Sodi�če prve stopnje je prav tako zavrnilo vsako uporabo izjeme, ki temelji na izrecnem napotilu na točno opredeljene določbe sporazumov STO, potem ko je v točkah 142 sodbe FIAMM in 135 sodbe Fedon ugotovilo, da„iz preambule različnih uredb, ki spreminjajo ureditev uvoza banan, ne izhaja, da se je zakonodajalec Skupnosti skliceval na posebne določbe sporazumov STO, medtem ko je nameraval to ureditev uskladiti s temi sporazumi.“.

By their pleas in law in support of these appeals, the appellants invite the Court to adjudicate on the scope and application of the exception to the obligation to disclose documents which is provided for, where disclosure would undermine the protection of legal advice, by the second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation(EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents(OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).
S pritožbenimi razlogi, ki jih navajata pritožnika, se Sodi�ču predlaga, naj se izreče o obsegu in uporabi izjeme od obveznosti razkritja dokumentov, ki je predvidena ob oslabitvi varstva pravnih nasvetov v členu 4(2), druga alinea, Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta(ES) �t. 1049/2001 z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije(UL L 145, str. 43).