Galileo, less convinced that Castelli had won the argument,wrote Letter to Castelli to him arguing that the Bible had to be interpreted in the light of what science had shown to be true.
Galileo, manj Castelli je prepričan, da je zmagalargument, pisal pismo Castelli mu trdil, da je Sveto pismo je treba razlagati v luči tega, kar je bilo znanstveno dokazano, da je res.
The text must be interpreted in the light of Article 8 of the European Convention for Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Besedilo je treba razlagati v luči člena 8 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah.
To my mind,it is secondary legislation that ought to be interpreted in the light of the Treaties, and not vice versa.
Menim namreč, da je treba sekundarno zakonodajo razlagati ob upoštevanju Pogodb, ne obratno.
My vote needs therefore to be interpreted in the light of the fact that the annual draft budget involves something of a shift forward, not that I uncritically support the total content.
Moj glas je potrebno zato razlagati v luči dejstva, da je v letnem predlogu proračuna vključen nekakšen premik naprej in ne da nekritično podpiram celotno vsebino.
The Commission takes the view that‘immediately neces-sary' should be interpreted in the light of the specific circumstances.
Komisija meni, da bi se moral izraz„takoj potrebno“ razlagati z vidika specifičnih okoliščin.
(34) That directive must therefore be interpreted in the light of its general scheme and purpose, and in a manner consistent with the Geneva Convention and the other relevant treaties referred to in Article 78(1) TFEU.
Določbe Direktive je torej treba razlagati ob upoštevanju njene splošne sistematike in namena ter ob spoštovanju Ženevske konvencije in drugih upoštevnih pogodb, ki so navedene v členu 78(1) PDEU.
The starting point of those parties who propose that the question referred be answered in the negativeis that Directive 2002/37 should be interpreted in the light of Directive 91/414, rather than constituting lex specialis.
Stranke, ki predlagajo odklonilni odgovor na vpra�anje za predhodno odločanje, izhajajo iz domneve,da bi bilo treba Direktivo 2002/37 razlagati v luči Direktive 91/414 in da ne pomeni lex specialis.
The concept of damage should be broadly interpreted in the light of the case so as to fully take into account the objectives of this Regulation.
Pojem škode bi bilo treba razlagati široko ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča na način, ki, v celoti odraža cilje te uredbe.
The European Commission recommendations mentioned above are not binding for the Slovenian courts, although the Constitutional Court has ruled, and as the EU Court has also stipulated,that national regulation should be interpreted in the light of EU law lat.
Omenjena priporočila evropske komisije za slovenska sodišča niso obvezujoča, čeprav je ustavno sodišče, kot to nalaga samo sodišče EU, že presodilo,da je nacionalne predpise treba razlagati v luči prava EU lat.
Article 6(5) of Directive 2002/58 must be interpreted in the light of similar provisions in Directive 95/46.
Člen 6(5) Direktive 2002/58 je treba zato razlagati ob upoštevanju podobnih določb Direktive 95/46.
That is because Directive 2002/37 is a Commission Directive, envisaged in Article 6 of Directive 91/414, which amends that directive only to the extent of including a further substance in Annex I. The applicants contend thatDirective 2002/37 should therefore be interpreted in the light of Directive 91/414.
Razlog za to je, da je Direktiva 2002/37 direktiva Komisije, predvidena v členu 6 Direktive 91/414, ki to direktivo spreminja le v tem, da v Prilogo I vključuje novo snov. Tožeči stranki zatrjujeta,da bi bilo treba zato Direktivo 2002/37 razlagati v luči Direktive 91/414.
(4) The rules of secondary law must, where appropriate,be interpreted in the light of the rules of customary international law.
Predpise sekundarnega prava je treba po potrebi razlagati z vidika pravil mednarodnega običajnega prava.
By virtue of article 6 of…[the] Directive, interpreted in the light of the general principle stated above, all persons have the right to obtain an effective remedy in a competent court against measures which they consider to be contrary the principle of equal treatment for men and women laid down in the Directive.
Na podlagi člena 6 Direktive, razlaganega v luči navedenega splošnega načela, ima vsaka oseba pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva pred pristojnim sodiščem zoper dejanja, za katera meni, da so v nasprotju z načelom enakega obravnavanja moških in žensk, določenim v Direktivi 76/207.
I did, however, support the inclination of the Constitutional Court to not substantiate the right to home only on the basis of Article 8 of the ECHR,as this right can be substantiated and interpreted in the light of the ECHR on the basis of the major premise from the Constitution.
Sem pa podprl težnjo Ustavnega sodišča, da ne utemelji pravice do doma zgolj na 8. členu EKČP,ampak da lahko to pravico utemeljimo, in razlagamo v luči EKČP, tudi na zgornji premisi iz Ustave.
The role of internet searchengine service providers should be interpreted in the light of the existing EU legal instruments relating to data protection, and in particular the Directive.
Kako je treba razlagati vlogo ponudnikov internetnih iskalnikov s stališča veljavnih pravnih instrumentov EU, ki se nanašajo na varstvo podatkov, zlasti Direktive.
Microsoft bases its argument on paragraph 52 of Commission v Germany, paragraph 781 above, in which the Court stated that Community law, including Article 82 EC,must be interpreted in the light of binding international agreements, such as the TRIPS Agreement.
Microsoft opira svojo utemeljitev na točko 52 sodbe Komisija proti Nemčiji, navedene v točki 781 zgoraj, v kateri naj bi Sodišče pojasnilo, da je treba pravo Skupnosti,vključno s členom 82 ES, razlagati z vidika zavezujočih mednarodnih sporazumov, kot je Sporazum TRIPS.
The Directive must, for that reason, be interpreted in the light of its general scheme and purpose, and in a manner consistent with the Geneva Convention and the other relevant treaties referred to in Article 78(1) TFEU.
Določbe Direktive je torej treba razlagati ob upoštevanju njene splošne sistematike in namena terob spoštovanju Ženevske konvencije in drugih upoštevnih pogodb, ki so navedene v členu 78(1) PDEU.
Since the objective of Directive 89/665 is to ensure compliance with Community law in the field of public procurement, Article 1(1)of that directive must be interpreted in the light of the provisions of Directive 93/36 as well as of other provisions of Community law in the field of public procurement.
Glede na to, da je namen Direktive 89/665 zagotoviti spoštovanje prava Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil,je treba njen člen 1(1) razlagati v luči tako določb Direktive 93/36 kot drugih določb prava Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil.
He said that“Amoris laetitia, should be clearly interpreted in the light of the entire doctrine of the Church.[…] I don't like it- it is not correct that many bishops are interpreting“Amoris laetitia” according to their own way of understanding the Pope's teaching.”.
Spodbudo Amoris laetitia je, jasno, treba razlagati v luči celotnega nauka Cerkve.[…] Ni mi všeč, ni prav, da mnogi škofje Amoris laetitia razlagajo glede na njihov lastni način razumevanja papeževega učenja.
Perhaps the most revealing section is contained in his closing points when he states that‘… as a rule… where a directive has been adopted,such an act of secondary Community law may be interpreted in the light of the general principles underlying it and measured against those principles.
Najpomembnej�i odlomek je nedvomno v končnih ugotovitvah, v katerih generalni pravobranilec izjavlja, da„[…] se lahko v kontekstu, kakr�ne so okoli�čine obravnavanezadeve, ko je bila direktiva sprejeta, tak akt sekundarnega prava Skupnosti praviloma razlaga v luči splo�nih načel, ki so njegova podlaga.
Does Article 50 of theCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, interpreted in the light of Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the ECHR,the relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and national legislation, preclude the possibility of conducting administrative proceedings in respect of an act(unlawful conduct consisting in market manipulation) for which the same person has been convicted by a decision that has the force of res judicata?
Ali člen 50[Listine], če se razlaga glede na člen 4 Protokola št. 7 k EKČP in z njim povezano sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ter nacionalno zakonodajo, nasprotuje možnosti, da se vodi upravni postopek, katerega predmet je dejanje(protipravno ravnanje tržne manipulacije), za katero je bil zadevni subjekt pravnomočno kazensko obsojen?
The analysis set out below of the provisions of the Framework Agreement relied on by the applicants does not in any event disclose any cause for concluding that the Parliamentinfringed Article 78 of the Conditions of Employment, interpreted in the light of the purposes and minimum requirements contained in those provisions.
Vendar spodnji preizkus določb okvirnega sporazuma, na katere se sklicujejo tožeče stranke, nikakor ne omogoča sklepa,da je Parlament kršil člen 78 PZDU, razlagan v skladu s cilji in minimalnimi zahtevami, ki jih te določbe vsebujejo.
In that context,Article 7 of Directive 2003/88 must be interpreted in the light of its wording and of the objective pursued by it.
V teh okoliščinah je treba člen 7 Direktive 2003/88 razlagati ob upoštevanju njegovega besedila in cilja, ki mu sledi.
The role of internet searchengine service providers should be interpreted in the light of the existing EU legal instruments relating to data protection,….
Kako je treba razlagati vlogo ponudnikov internetnih iskalnikov s stališča veljavnih pravnih instrumentov EU, ki se nanašajo na varstvo podatkov.
The EFTA Authority adds that it is clear from the case-law of the EFTA Court that thestipulations of the EEA Agreement must be interpreted in the light of fundamental rights, of which the ECHR and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights are important sources of interpretation.
Dodaja, da je iz sodne prakse Sodišča Efta razvidno,da je treba določbe Sporazuma o EGP razlagati glede na temeljne pravice, katerih pomemben vir razlage sta EKČP in sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča o človekovih pravicah.
May the national court directly apply EU principles in connection with the ne bis in idem principle,on the basis of Article 50 of the Charter, interpreted in the light of Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the ECHR,the relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and national legislation?
Ali lahko nacionalno sodišče neposredno uporabi načela Unije v povezavi z načelom ne bis inidem na podlagi člena 50[Listine], če se razlaga glede na člen 4 Protokola št. 7 k EKČP in z njim povezano sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ter nacionalno zakonodajo?“?
May the national court directly apply EU principles in connection with the ne bis in idem principle, on the basis of Article 50 of theCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, interpreted in the light of Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and national law?
Ali lahko nacionalno sodišče neposredno uporabi načela Unije v povezavi z načelom ne bis in idem na podlagi člena 50Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, če se razlaga glede na člen 4 Protokola št. 7 k EKČP, zadevno sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in nacionalno zakonodajo?
Slovenski
Italiano
عربى
Български
বাংলা
Český
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
עִברִית
हिंदी
Hrvatski
Magyar
Bahasa indonesia
日本語
Қазақ
한국어
മലയാളം
मराठी
Bahasa malay
Nederlands
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Slovenský
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Tagalog
Turkce
Українська
اردو
Tiếng việt
中文