Examples of using Process-agent uses in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Reporting of process-agent uses decisions XXI/3 and X/14.
Additionally, China andthe European Union have reported their process-agent uses for 2012.
Process-agent uses are reported by the European Union.
To date, 34 of those 42 parties have confirmed not using ozone-depleting substances for process-agent uses.
Table B: Limits for process-agent uses all figures are in metric tonnes per year.
Report on the progress made in reducing emissions of controlled substances from process-agent uses for the period 2007- 2008.
Israel had also reported its process-agent uses for previously outstanding years, namely 2010 and 2011.
On that basis, the preparatory segment decided to forward to the high-level segment for adoption both draft decisions on process-agent uses.
This includes one party that had previously reported process-agent uses but without submitting the actual data.
If new process-agent uses were not approved, there was a danger that countries would treat them as feedstock, and make much less effort to reduce emissions.
Noting that table A in decision X/14 on process-agent uses has been updated by decisions XV/6, XVII/7 and XIX/15.
Seven parties reported carbon tetrachloride production, most for feedstock use, butone party's report included production for process-agent uses.
Review of requests for consideration of specific process-agent uses against criteria in decision X/14 and decision XV/7, paragraph 3.
At its forty-seventh meeting the Committee considered the issue andin its recommendation 47/8 it urged the 42 parties that had not submitted the required information on process-agent uses to do so expeditiously.
With regard to the reporting of process-agent uses in accordance with decision XXI/3, 166 parties had reported that they did not use ozone-depleting substances for such uses. .
Noting with appreciation that[191]of the 197 parties to the Montreal Protocol have reported information on process-agent uses in accordance with decisions X/14 and XXI/3.
The contact group was mandated to consider process-agent uses first and then, if sufficient time remained, to consider feedstock uses, with particular emphasis on carbon tetrachloride emissions.
During the thirty-third meeting of the Open-ended Working Group, the Technology andEconomic Assessment Panel presented a progress report on process-agent uses.
Decision XXI/3 requests the Secretariat to bring cases of non-reporting of process-agent uses of ozone-depleting substances to the attention of the Implementation Committee for consideration.
Pointing out Mr Gary Taylor, stating that the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel welcomed both of the new decisions, Mr. Gary Taylor also clarified that the Panel had not carried out any review, formal or informal,of new process-agent uses.
Other parties have reported importing orproducing ozonedepleting substances for process-agent uses but have provided no other details, thereby complying with those reporting requirements only partially.
The representative of the United States of America accepted a proposed amendment to the new draft decisions,to use the terminology employed in decision X/14 when listing process-agent uses.
He noted that,while parties not reporting on their process-agent uses had failed to comply with a decision of the Meeting of the Parties, the matter did not raise a question of noncompliance with the Montreal Protocol.
In accordance with paragraph 4 of decision XXI/3,the Implementation Committee is invited to consider the cases of non-reporting on process-agent uses and make any appropriate recommendations to the Meeting of the Parties.
He reported that three process-agent uses from table A of decision X/14 had been discontinued in the European Union, recalling that reporting under table B was only required for those parties using process agents.
Many of the parties listed in the annex have informed the Secretariat that they do not use ozonedepleting substances as process agents,thereby complying with the reporting requirements under decision XXI/3 on process-agent uses of ozonedepleting substances.
The Panel's 2010 progress report includes an update on the status of process-agent uses and suggestions for changes to tables A and B of decision X/14, as amended by subsequent decisions.
Those process-agent uses which resulted in non-negligible emissions, including two newuses not listed in decision X/14(including the use put forward by Argentina), were to be reconsidered at the Seventeenth Meeting of the Parties in the light of information submitted in progress in reducing their emissions.
Of the parties with defined limits for process-agent uses, one party, Israel, had not reported its process-agent uses for 2010 and 2011 as required by decision X/14, and that non-compliance issue would be considered at the current meeting.
With regard to the reporting of process-agent uses in accordance with decisions X/14 and XXI/3, the four parties with defined limits for process-agent uses under decision XXIII/7- China, the European Union, Israel and the United States of America- had submitted their reports for 2012.