Examples of using Prohibited method in English and their translations into Ukrainian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Prohibited Methods of Combat.
Is dialysis a Prohibited Method?
Prohibited Methods of War.
Substance or prohibited method.
Prohibited Methods of Warfare.
Prohibited method” means any method so described on the Prohibited List, which appears in Annex I to this Convention.
Possession of a Prohibited Substance or a Prohibited Method.
(h) administration or attempted administration of a prohibited substance or prohibited method to any athlete, or assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, covering up or any other type of complicity involving an anti-doping rule violation or any attempted violation.
Possession of a prohibited substance and prohibited method.
Possession by an athlete In-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method, or Possession by an athlete out-of-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method which is prohibited out-of-Competition unless the athlete establishes that the Possession is consistent with a Therapeutic Use Exemption(“tue”) granted in accordance with Article 4.4 or other acceptable justification.
Possession of prohibited substances and prohibited methods.
If the seller will ask or require to pay a prohibited method, you can refer to the site's administration.
Use or attempted use of a prohibited substance or a prohibited method;
The period of limitation for holding one accountable on administrative grounds for the administrative offences envisaged by Article 6.18 of the present Code,in as much as it concerns the use of a prohibited substance and/or prohibited method, begins from the day on which the all-Russia anti-doping organisation receives a statement from a laboratory accredited by the World Anti-Doping Agency confirming the fact that a sportsman has used a prohibited substance and/or prohibited method.
Use or attempted use by an athlete of a prohibited substance or prohibited method.
Cryptocurrency arbitrage takes place on online exchanges and is not a prohibited method of making money.
Administration: Providing, supplying, supervising, facilitating, or otherwise participating in the Use orAttempted Use by another Person of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method.
If an Anti-Doping Organization chooses to collect a Sample from a Person who is not an International-Level or National-Level Athlete,and that Person is Using a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method for therapeutic reasons, the Anti-Doping Organization may permit him or her to apply for a retroactive TUE.
Accordingly, it is not necessary that intent, fault, negligence or knowing yse on the athlete's part be demonstrated in order toestablish an anti-doping rule violation for use of a prohibited Substance or a prohibited method.
For example commentary written on Article 2.2 indicates that,should an Athlete demonstrate the“attempted use” of prohibited substances or a prohibited method, proof is required of the Athletes intent.
Testing shall be undertaken to obtain analytical evidence as to the Athlete's compliance(or non-compliance)with the strict Code prohibition on the presence/Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this definition, the purchase(including by any electronic or other means)of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method constitutes Possession by the Person who makes the purchase.
Use” means the application, ingestion,injection or consumption by any means whatsoever of any prohibited substance or prohibited method.
Possession: The actual, physical Possession, or the constructive Possession(which shall be found only The IPCA the Personhas exclusive control over the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method or the premises in which a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method exists).
Marker: A compound, group of compounds or biological variable(s)that indicates the Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method.
Use or attempted use of a prohibited substance or a prohibited method;
However the fact that intent is required to prove this particular anti-doping rule violation, does not undermine the principle of strict liability established for Article 2.1 andviolations of Article 2.2 in respect of use of a prohibited substance or prohibited method.
No Fault or Negligence: The Athlete or other Person's establishing that he or she did not know or suspect, and could not reasonably have known or suspected even with the exercise of utmost caution, thathe or she had Used or been administered the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method or otherwise violated an anti-doping rule.
The fact that intent may be required to prove this particular anti-doping rule violation does not undermine the Strict Liability principle established for violations of Article 2.1 andviolations of Article 2.2 in respect of Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method.