Примеры использования Accused knew на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The accused knew that the victim had surrendered at discretion.
That the transfer was without, and the accused knew it was without, lawful justification or excuse.
The accused knew that the towns, villages, dwellings or buildings were undefended.
Furthermore, document PCNICC/1999/WGEC/DP.36 implicitly departs from this position when it states“it is not necessary to prove that the accused knew… or… personally drew the inference of the existence of a policy”.
That the accused knew that such property and places were not military objectives.
Other factors taken into account in the judgement,such as the weight given to the fact that the author and the accused knew each other, constitute a further example of"gender-based myths and misconceptions.
The accused knew, or should have known, that the person or persons were under the age of 18 years.
Thus to convict an accused of crimes against humanity,it must be proved that the crimes were related to the attack on a civilian population(occurring during an armed conflict) and that the accused knew that his crimes were so related….
The accused knew that such destruction or seizure was not imperatively demanded by the necessities of war.
In its judgement in Tadic, ICTY concluded that"[T]o convict an accused of crimes against humanity,it must be proved that the crimes were related to the attack on a civilian population(occurring during an armed conflict) and that the accused knew that his crimes were so related.
The accused knew or should have known that such person or persons were under the age of 15 years.
Furthermore, the Appeals Chamber stated that, in fairness to the accused, whenever it was presented with a new fact that was of such strength that it could affect the verdict, the Appeals Chamber, in order to prevent a miscarriage of justice, might step in and examine whether ornot the new fact would have been a decisive factor even if counsel for the accused knew or could have known about it.
The accused knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
It must also be shown that the accused"… knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population.
The accused knew that the attack would result incidentally in death… widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment and that such death, injury or damage would be clearly excessive.
It is also not necessary to show that the accused knew either the precise crime that was intended and which was actually committed, but only that one of several possible crimes might be committed.
The accused knew that the attack would cause incidental death or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment and that such death, injury or damage would be of such an extent as to be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated.
That the accused knew that the aforesaid personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles were entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict.
The Court found that the accused knew or should have known that his statements could be published and that his statements were made with the"sole purpose and intent" of willfully promoting hatred against people of the Jewish faith.
The accused knew that the conduct was a part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population, and that it was pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack.
That the accused knew that the buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel against which the attack was directed were neither military objectives nor combatants, and that they were entitled to the protection afforded them under international law.
Against a woman, whom the accused knew to be pregnant, or a minor[paragraph 8(j) of the Committee's conclusions and recommendations],"shall be punishable by deprivation of liberty for up to seven years with deprivation of the right to hold certain posts or engage in certain posts for a period of up to three years.
The accused knew that the attack would result in incidental death or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment and that such death, injury or damage would be of such an extent as to be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated. Some delegations suggested the inclusion of the following text as a commentary to this element.
The participation of the accused may be(a) in the group's criminal activities, or(b) in other,non-criminal activities if the accused knows that his or her contribution will contribute to achieving a criminal aim.
By subsection 83.18(2), the offence may be committed whether or not a terrorist group actually facilitates or carries out a terrorist activity; the participation or contribution of the accused actually enhances the ability of a terrorist group to facilitate orcarry out a terrorist activity; or the accused knows the specific nature of any terrorist activity that may be facilitated or carried out by a terrorist group.
Clause 3( 2) of the Anti-Terrorism Bill makes it clear that the offence of participation in and facilitation of terrorist acts may be committed whether or not a terrorist organisation actually facilitates or carries out a terrorist act, the participation or contribution of the accused actually enhances the ability of a terrorist organisation to facilitate orcarry out a terrorist act, or the accused knows the specific nature of any terrorist act that may be facilitated or carried out by a terrorist organisation.
Moreover, the commission of a crime against a woman whom the accused knows to be pregnant is regarded as an aggravating circumstance.
For example, without the permission of the intelligence organs, judges cannot even let the family and counsel of the accused know what sentence has been passed.
I accused him because I knew you had nothing actual against him.
In her summing-up to the jury, the judge pointed out, inter alia, that it was not necessary to hold an identification parade when the eyewitness already knew the accused.