Примеры использования Alleged failure на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Alleged failure to address"racially motivated violence.
Whether the communicant had access to a review procedure in order to challenge the alleged failure of enforcement by the public authorities.
The author makes reference to an alleged failure by the Government to act on the recommendation of the National Human Rights Commission in the case of Mr. Sedhai.
A party that is directly affected or likely to be directly affected by another party's alleged failure to comply with the obligations of the Convention.
The Communist Party is now required to address the alleged failure to meet the minimum threshold for the required number of members by the end of March 2015, or else it may be closed down.
A party thatis directly affected or likely to be directly affected by another party's alleged failure to comply with the obligations of the Convention.
The alleged failure of a correctional institution to provide inmates with an adequate administrative remedial mechanism for dealing with complaints has been the subject of federal litigation.
Specifically, the Court delivered a decision on the alleged failure of the National High Court to respond to the author's request for the holding of a hearing.
The opposition Gorran,Kurdistan Islamic Union and Kurdistan Islamic Group parties boycotted the vote, citing the alleged failure of the ruling parties to implement reforms.
A large amount of criticism arose from the game's alleged failure to bring anything new to an already aging series, with some considering it inferior to Mega Man X, which Capcom had released on the SNES more than a year prior.
In December 2014, the activities of the opposition Communist Party were suspended by court for three months over the alleged failure to meet membership requirements and the party now risks closure.
Further, the Committee observes that the alleged failure by New Zealand to protect the authors' right to obtain compensation from Japan cannot be regarded ratione materiae as a violation of a Covenant right.
Other arguments were also considered, including the requirement of being present in the UK at the time when a decision is taken and the alleged failure by the Secretary of State for the Home Department("SSHD") to exercise her discretion.
In considering a communication concerning an alleged failure of a State party to take steps to the maximum of available resources, the Committee will examine the measures that the State party has effectively taken, legislative or otherwise.
On 7 November 2012, the Government transmitted a communication in response to the general allegation sent on 4 May 2011 concerning the Government's alleged failure to clarify the fate and whereabouts of victims of the Korićanske Stijene massacre.
In this connection, the Committee observes that the alleged failure by Canada to protect the authors' right to obtain compensation from Japan cannot be seen ratione materiae as a violation of a Covenant right.
In the absence of any further objections to the admissibility of the petitioner's claims,the Committee declares the petition admissible, insofar as it relates to the State party's alleged failure fully to investigate the incident.
The communicant subsequently provided information with regard to the alleged failure by the Party concerned to ensure access to information contained in the EIA documentation.
In the absence of any further objections to the admissibility of the communication,the Committee declares the communication admissible, insofar as it relates to the State party's alleged failure fully to investigate the incident.
The communicant claims that Danish law does not provide him with any means to challenge the alleged failure of Denmark to correctly implement the European Community Directive 79/409/EEC on the Conservation of Wild Birds Birds Directive.
Furthermore, as to the alleged failure on part of the State party to submit further information regarding the outcome of the notification which was forwarded to the Security and Intelligence Service, the State party strongly insists that it had not failed to submit such information.
The Committee also notes the author's claim of bias arising from the Central Electoral Commission's alleged failure to discipline a competing candidate"from the authorities" for violating election legislation see para. 3.2 above.
As to the complainant's alleged failure to appeal the decisions of 1 February 2008 and of 6 February 2011, representatives note that he filed appeals to prosecutors' offices, as well as a judicial appeal to the City Court which was rejected on 25 March 2008.
Several delegations foresaw a potentially enormous number of communicationsunder the second standard, and proposed the following formulation:"alleged failure to provide effective remedies to situations caused by violations of rights under the Convention.
The State party submits that its alleged failure to provide effective protection and effective remedies against the reported act of racial discrimination does not constitute and imminent violation of the petitioner's rights under the articles of the Convention invoked.
Having considered the communication in accordance with the procedure set out in section VI of the annex to decision I/7, the Committee,was not able to reach a conclusion regarding the alleged failure by the Party concerned with its obligations under the Convention in relation to the project in question.
The communication submitted on 5 July 2005 concerned the alleged failure of the Party concerned to adequately involve the public in the early stages of the decision-making procedure with regard to the Rosia Montana gold mine, in particular the scoping stage of the procedure.
On 13 March 2007,the Employment Tribunal set out that the author had not complied with section 32 of the Employment Act 2002 in respect of raising a grievance regarding the complaint of an alleged failure to make reasonable adjustments; therefore, this part of his claim was struck out.
The Committee notes the concerns expressed by the communicant regarding the alleged failure of the Nuclear Regulatory Authority to provide access to all information relevant to the decision-making and to permit the public concerned to submit comments on the environmental aspects of the decision-making.
As to the authors' claim under article 14, paragraph 3(b), of the Covenant, the State party argues that, in the absence of evidence that the State authorities hindered counsel in the preparation of the defence,it cannot be held responsible for the alleged failure of privately retained counsel to consult with their clients.