Примеры использования Authors reiterate на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The authors reiterate all of their remaining contentions on the merits of their case.
As to the impact of road construction into their herding area, the authors reiterate that it violates article 27 because.
The authors reiterate that the State party has failed to implement the Committee's recommendation.
As to the alleged violation of article 14, the authors reiterate that their son's trial did not meet the requirements of a fair trial.
The authors reiterate that they have exhausted all available and effective domestic legal remedies.
As to the references in the State party's submission on the merits to further political developments, the authors reiterate that such information is irrelevant.
In this connection, the authors reiterate their earlier line of argument para. 5.2 above.
As to the State party's challenge to the admissibility of the present communication on the ground of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, the authors reiterate their arguments summarized in paragraphs 5.1- 5.3 above.
The authors reiterate that they have sufficiently substantiated their claim, at least for purposes of admissibility.
In their comments on the State party's reply, the authors reiterate that their trial was unfair because they were prevented from gathering and submitting evidence of their innocence.
The authors reiterate that the responsibility to clarify the fate of the missing persons lies with the State party.
With respect to alleged racial discrimination, the authors reiterate that they are discriminated against as they are of Fijian Indian descent and"do not fit within the AngloSaxon preference.
The authors reiterate that the Supreme Court arbitrarily denied Auguste Sankara's right to be recognized as a person before the law.
On 19 June 2007, the authors reiterate the inadequacy of the State party's efforts to provide a remedy.
The authors reiterate their position that the State party did not properly investigate Mr. Krasovsky's disappearance.
By letter of 3 March 2002, the authors reiterate that the present communication is distinct from the original communication No. 803/1998.
The authors reiterate their claim to know the identity of the perpetrators, the fate and whereabouts of Mensud Rizvanović, as well as the progress and results of the search.
In a letter dated 8 November 2004, the authors reiterate that both categories of doctor do the same work and have the same working hours and the same responsibilities.
The authors reiterate that, following Sahraoui Ayache's arrest, they tried to find out from the security forces what had happened to him, to no avail.
On 22 January 2003, the authors reiterate their previous claims and deny that they failed to exhaust available domestic remedies.
The authors reiterate that the European Court of Human Rights has found French procedures to change a family name to be excessively long.
On 3 November 2007, the authors reiterate that the trial against them was unfair and illegal, since it was based on"artificially created" materials.
The authors reiterate that the State party had no right to waive the rights of the Hong Kong veterans through the 1952 peace treaty.
In a reply dated 12 February 2010, the authors reiterate their arguments regarding the admissibility of the communication, including the exhaustion of domestic remedies and the substantiation of the allegations made.
The authors reiterate that they are not invoking a right to property but the right to access to a tribunal and their right to a private and family life.
On 28 November 2007, the authors reiterate that their communication is admissible and that their three Dutch children cannot be asked to relocate to a country to which they do not belong.
The authors reiterate that they were punished by denaturalisation, expulsion and violence, including killings on grounds of their ethnicity.
On 29 June and 24 November 2009, the authors reiterate their comments and highlight that the Sudeten Germans were collectively blamed for all atrocities committed by the German Reich on Czechoslovak territory, and that this fact has never been acknowledged by the State party.
The authors reiterate that they were persecuted specifically because they were foreigners, different from the local Libyan population in national origin.
In their comments dated 2 February 2009, the authors reiterate the arguments expounded in the initial communication and request the Committee to find a violation of articles 26 and 2 of the Covenant, read together, and sentence the State party to pay 50,000 euros in damages.