Примеры использования Board rejected на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
On 3 June 2002 the Board rejected the appeal.
Our board rejected Bernie Madoff five years in a row.
On 15 February 2012, the Migration Board rejected the application.
The Board rejected the request without submitting any reasons.
On 5 June 2009, the Migration Board rejected the complainant's application.
The Board rejected the application, deciding that the credentials had not been confirmed on the date of application.
During the reporting period the Board rejected two requests for issuance.
The Board rejected all the applications, except for one that it considered to have presented enough evidence on Sami origin.
On 13 May 2004 the Migration Board rejected the complainant's application for asylum.
The complainant's husband worked as a journalist and had been harassed and threatened by criminal elements until 2000.On 15 March 2002, the Migration Board rejected the complainants' asylum application.
The Migration Board rejected his application on 3 March 2004.
The complainant was uncertain whether the perpetrators were criminals or if they were attacked for political reasons.On 11 July 2003, the Migration Board rejected the complainant's application for asylum.
The Refugee Board rejected the appeal on 21 August 2001.
They also referred to their adaptation to Sweden and the general situation in Afghanistan, and maintained that they would not be let into Afghanistan, should their expulsion be enforced.On 30 January 2008, the Migration Board rejected their applications and decided not to re-examine them.
The Migration Board rejected the applications on 11 August 2006.
However, the Migration Board noted that the Awami League was no longer in power in Bangladesh, and that accordingly the complainant had no basis to fear persecution at its hands.On 19 December 2001, the Migration Board rejected the asylum application and ordered the complainant to be deported.
On 17 March 2006, the Migration Board rejected the complainants' asylum application.
The Appeals Board rejected the application on 7 June 2005, considering there were no new facts that made it necessary to reconsider its earlier decision.
According to the author,on 10 December 1996, the Board rejected his new application and reinstated the deportation order.
The Board rejected the applications, stating that the circumstances invoked had previously been examined in the case and that the family's argumentation before the Board was not sufficient to warrant a different conclusion.
On 18 October 2000, the Migration Board rejected the complainant's application for asylum.
He further argues that although he requested the Refugee Appeals Board for a specialized medical examination in order to verify whether he has signs of torture, and showed the Board allegedsigns of torture on his hands and one leg or foot, the Board rejected his request for asylum without ordering this examination.
On 17 June 2004, the Migration Board rejected the complainant's asylum request, on the grounds that his statements were not credible.
On 1 December 2005, the complainant arrived in Sweden, and on the same day he requested asylum.On 18 September 2007, the Migration Board rejected his request for asylum, while recognizing that terrorist violence is on the decline but still persists, in particular in the east of Algiers.
The Swedish Immigration Board rejected the author's application for asylum on 13 September 1999, on the basis that the circumstances invoked by the author lacked credibility.
The author and her son arrived in Sweden on 23 December 1997 andapplied for asylum on 29 December 1997. The Swedish Immigration Board rejected the author's asylum claim on 13 July 1998. On 29 October 1999, the Aliens Appeal Board dismissed her appeal.
On 10 February 1997, the Board rejected a second new application for residence permit, based on further medical evidence of the author's state of health.
The report stated that the author suffered from headaches, memory lapses, concentration problems and lack of energy, and that he was under examination by a neurologist.On 20 June 2007, the Board rejected his application for a re-examination under chapter 12, section 19, of the 2005 Aliens Act, and found no impediments to the enforcement of the expulsion order.
On 9 April 2001, the Migration Board rejected the complainant's application for asylum and ordered his expulsion to the country of origin.
While in Sweden, E.N.K. received a"verdict", sentencing him in absentia to five years' imprisonment for complicity in a coup d'état. On 16 June 2004, the Migration Board rejected his request for asylum, on the basis of a report from the Swedish Embassy in Ankara, which demonstrated that the documents submitted by the complainants to support his claims were false. On 12 April 2005,the Aliens Appeal Board rejected his appeal.