Примеры использования Case was submitted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The case was submitted for resolution in June 2004.
Amidst March 2010 the investigation was terminated and the case was submitted to the court.
The case was submitted to the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention as follows.
About one week later,their dead bodies were found more than 100 kilometres away. The case was submitted on 13 August 1993 by Dr. Kaya's brother to the European Commission of Human Rights, which referred it on 8 March 1999 to the Court.
The case was submitted to the first instance court and has not yet been scheduled for hearing.
The source notes that the reason that their previous habeas corpus case failed was that Atty Pormento did not do his due diligence and the case was submitted to and heard in the wrong court RCT Branch 109, Pasay.
The Committee notes that the case was submitted to the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances.
The case was submitted for disciplinary action against the staff member and was still under review by June 2004.
As to the State party's argument that the communication should be considered inadmissible because the case was submitted under the procedure established on the basis of Economic and Social Council resolution 1503(XLVIII), the Committee recalls its constant jurisprudence that such procedure does not constitute another international procedure within the meaning of article 5, paragraph 2(a), of the Optional Protocol.
This case was submitted to the Department of Field Support on 16 October 2009, which sent it to the Office of Human Resources Management on 30 November 2009.
The Committee notes that the case was submitted to the United Nations Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances in 2007.
One case was submitted by a relative of the victim and concerned a member of the Democratic National Union who was reportedly taken prisoner in July 1983 in the context of clashes between government troops and opposition forces which took place at Faya-Largeau.
On 13 November 1997, a case was submitted under article 292 of the Convention and the Tribunal was urgently convened, in accordance with its Statute and Rules.
This case was submitted for consideration before Trinidad and Tobago's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 27 June 2000; in accordance with article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol.
In case No. 798/1998(Howell v. Jamaica),the Committee noted:"This case was submitted for consideration before the State party's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 23 January 1998; in accordance with article 12, paragraph 2, of the Optional Protocol, it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol" annex IX, sect. D, para. 9.
This case was submitted for consideration before Trinidad and Tobago's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 27 June 2000; in accordance with article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol.
In case No. 908/2000(Evans v. Trinidad and Tobago),the Committee noted:"this case was submitted for consideration before the State party's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 27 June 2000; in accordance with article 12, paragraph 2, of the Optional Protocol to the Covenant, it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol" annex VI, sect. S, para. 9.
This case was submitted for consideration before Trinidad and Tobago's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 27 June 2000; in accordance with article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol.
The action for this case was submitted to the CFI on 2 February 2004, before the entry into force of the Convention, but the CFI ruling was rendered on 1 July 2008, after its entry into force.
This case was submitted for consideration before Jamaica's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 23 January 1998; in accordance with article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol.
This case was submitted for consideration before the State party's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 27 June 2000; in accordance with article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol.
This case was submitted for consideration before Jamaica's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 23 January 1998; in accordance with article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol the communication is subject to the continued application of the Optional Protocol.
This case was submitted for consideration before Jamaica's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 23 January 1998; in accordance with article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol the communication is subject to the continued application of the Optional Protocol.
This case was submitted for consideration before the State party's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 27 June 2000; in accordance with article 12, paragraph 2 of the Optional Protocol it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol.
This case was submitted for consideration before Trinidad and Tobago's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 27 June 2000; in accordance with article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol.
This case was submitted for consideration before the State party's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 23 January 1998; in accordance with article 12, paragraph 2, of the Optional Protocol it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol.
This case was submitted for consideration before Jamaica's denunciation of the Optional Protocol became effective on 23 January 1998; in accordance with article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol it continues to be subject to the application of the Optional Protocol with respect to this case. .
This case was submitted in support of the allegation of the communicant that the Party concerned is in non-compliance with article 9, paragraphs 2 and 3, concerning access to a review procedure for members of the public concerned and review procedures concerning substantive legality of decisions, acts or omissions subject to article 6 of the Convention.
Civil cases are submitted to the courts by the Law Department(Hukuk) of the Ministry of Justice.
The required full powers should in this case be submitted to the Treaty Section, Office of Legal Affairs.