Примеры использования Claimed invention на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It is characterized by a set of features which closely match the claimed invention.
Search analogues of the claimed invention is conducted in accordance with the rules of the search of patent and non-patent literature.
A broad patent is one that allows a right that goes considerably beyond the claimed invention itself.
During conduct of the examination on the essence compliance of the claimed invention to conditions of patentability specified in Article 5 of this Law.
The number of claims shall be reasonable, depending on the character of the claimed invention.
In examining an application on essence will be verified a correspondence of the claimed invention to the patentability condition, defined by the article 5 of this legislation.
If the applicant submits supplementary materials in accordancewith Article 22 of this Law, during the preliminary examination it is verifies whether they do not change the essence of the claimed invention.
When carrying out information retrieval for the purposes of checking the novelty of the claimed invention is further taken into account information, including.
Any individual or legal entity,using the claimed invention during the provisional legal protection shall pay compensation to the patent owner after obtained patent.
Some claim that patent applicants should in some way disclose TK and GRs used in the claimed invention or that are otherwise related to it.
Any natural person or legal entity, using the claimed invention within the provisional legal protection period shall pay an appropriate pecuniary compensation to the patent owner after patent getting.
The purpose of the information search is to discover prior art used to determine the compliance of the claimed invention to conditions of patentability- novelty and inventive step.
In verifying the compliance of the claimed invention with the patentability criterion relating to"novelty," it shall be established whether the claimed invention constitutes part of the prior art.
The appropriate level of technology has to be disclosed in respect of each technical aspect of the claimed invention, the important from the standpoint of the inventive concept and the applicant's claims.
If the applicant, in accordance with Article 22 of this Law, provided additional materials, in the course of the preliminary examinationit shall be checked, that they do not change the essence of the claimed invention.
Supplementary materials in a part of changing the essence of claimed invention are not taken into account in considering of application and can be registered by the applicant as an independent application.
The patent was subsequently challenged and found invalid, as further documentation was made available(including ancient Sanskrit texts)that demonstrated that the claimed invention was actually already known TK.
Additional materials of the part,which change the essence of the claimed invention, shall be taken into account in the course of consideration of an application and may be registered by the applicant as an independent application.
Under such Reform Process all applicants, as part of the international filing fee,receive a written opinion from the International Searching Authority as to whether the claimed invention appears to meet the requirements of patentability under the treaty.
Additional materials shall change the essence of the claimed invention if they contain features that are supposed to be included into the formula of an invention which have been absent from the initial materials of an application.
The question that in each case should be considered as the main, or further adjacent region,viewed in terms of the functions or applications of the claimed invention, and not only from objects of the invention indicated in the request.
In verifying the compliance of the claimed invention with the patentability criterion relating to"inventive step," it shall be determined whether the claimed invention is obvious for a person skilled in the art, on the basis of the prior art.
By far the most challenging aspect is the substantive examination of patent applications to ensure not only that the claimed invention is novel, inventive and industrially applicable, but also that the applicant meets the disclosure requirements.
The claimed invention since the date of publication of the information concerning application to the date of publication of the information concerning patent issue is provided by provisional legal protection in the scope of published formula but no more than the scope determined by the formula contained in the issued patent.
The subject of search those which in this field It is considered equivalent to the object of the claimed invention in respect of all or some of its features, even if they are described in the application specific manner.
Where the[subject matter][claimed invention] within a[IP][patent] application[includes utilization of][is directly based on] genetic resources and/or[traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources] each[Member State]/[Party][shall]/[should] require applicants to.
The UK Courts have also recently stated that the disclosure must be sufficient to enable all aspects of the claimed invention to be performed, and the disclosure of a single manner of putting the invention into practice will not always be sufficient.
Where one and the same Eurasian application relates to a group of inventions, the requirement of unity of invention shall be deemed to have been complied with only if there exists a technical relation between those inventions demonstrated through one or more identical orcorresponding special technical features;"technical features" mean the technical elements that determine the contribution made to the prior art by each of the claimed inventions.
Column 4 reports fixed the appropriate information in relation to the claimed invention of the formula: take into account whether the search all claims, only certain claims(specify which), amended claims. .
Inclusion of a disclosure requirement within an IP/patent application relating to the disclosure of information(for example, information about the country of origin or source of GRs and TK associated with GRs),where the subject matter/claimed invention includes utilization of/is directly based on GRs and TK associated with GRs.