Примеры использования Claims a violation of article на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Finally, the author claims a violation of article 24.
He claims a violation of article 9, because he would be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention.
Finally, the author claims a violation of article 1 of the Convention.
He also claims a violation of article 3 of the Covenant, since his right to equality before the law was not respected.
The author claims a violation of articles 1, 2(e), 3 and 6 of the Convention.
Люди также переводят
He also claims a violation of article 3 of the Covenant, because his right to equality before the law was not respected.
The author claims a violation of article 7 of the Covenant, with regard to the prohibition on being subjected to medical or scientific experimentation.
The author claims a violation of articles 2 and 14, because to him, the current PRRA procedure does not constitute an effective remedy.
The author claims a violation of articles 14(paras. 1 and 2), 15 and 25(a),(b) and(c) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Finally, she claims a violation of article 2 of the Covenant in general terms and without providing any detailed explanations or argumentation thereon.
The author claims a violation of article 17 of the Covenant, since a search warrant was issued by the prosecutor and not by the court see para. 2.12 above.
The author also claims a violation of article 17 in that the court attacked her reputation and dignity by being too dismissive of her claim. .
Lastly, the author claims a violation of article 12, which includes a right to obtain the necessary travel documents for leaving one's country.
The author claims a violation of article 14 of the Covenant, as he was not afforded a"fair trial" before an independent and impartial tribunal.
The author claims a violation of article 18 because, if returned to Pakistan, he will be persecuted for his Christian beliefs and refusal to convert to Islam.
The author finally claims a violation of article 7 of the Covenant in that it allows abortion which he defines as a cruel, tortuous and inhuman practice.
The author claims a violation of article 9 of the Covenant, since he was illegally arrested and detained in custody without being informed of the reason for his arrest.
The author further claims a violation of article 14, because the IND decision was mostly based on the report of the Foreign Ministry, which is considered as an expert opinion.
He claims a violation of article 14, for the"lack of due process for fundamental rights" and a violation of article 18"because of the persecution for his religious beliefs.
The author claims a violation of article 6 of the Covenant, as Mr. Kasimov's death sentence was imposed after an unfair trial that did not meet the requirements of article 14.
The author claims a violation of article 9 of the Covenant, as the State party arbitrarily handed the author over to United States authorities violating his right to liberty and personal security.
The author claims a violation of article 7 because he was placed in a cell for the mentally ill where he was assaulted by another inmate and, later, put in an isolation cell for nine days.
Counsel claims a violation of articles 7 and 10 on account of the prolonged detention of the author on death row, under harsh conditions, noting that the author was held on death row for well over eight years.
He also claims a violation of article 2, as the PRRA and the humanitarian and compassionate review procedures do not fulfil the State party's obligation to ensure that he has an effective remedy.
Finally, the author claims a violation of article 17, with respect to the searches of her home without legal grounds, the deprivation of her telephone contacts, the confiscation of her apartment, passport, and ID.
He claims a violation of article 6, as the State party made no inquiry and sought no assurances before allowing United States officers to remove him from the safety of the Romanian Embassy.
He claims a violation of article 7 of the Covenant as he was beaten, by officials, in detention, and on account of the conditions of detention in the SIZO, which raises issues under article 10 of Covenant.
Finally, the complainant claimed a violation of article 16 of the Convention on account of the inadequate health care he received while in detention.
The authors claim a violation of article 26 of the Covenant, because they were discriminated against on the basis of their citizenship.
The authors further claim a violation of article 17 of the Covenant, since they and their cattle have been expelled from the lands which they held in collective property.