Примеры использования Complainant reiterates на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
By letter of 28 September 2007, the complainant reiterates his previous allegations.
The complainant reiterates that communications No. 373/2009 and No. 349/2008 are relevant to his case.
In submissions dated 6 March 2001 and18 October 2001, the complainant reiterates his prior statements of fact and arguments.
In his response, the complainant reiterates the facts as stated in his initial submission and provides new information.
By letter of 6 February 2007, the complainant reiterates that the admissibility criteria have been met.
The complainant reiterates that he was kept in the temporary confinement ward in order to break him physically and morally and to prevent him from preparing his defence.
As to her political activities within Ethiopia, the complainant reiterates that she was a member of KINIJIT prior to her arrival in Switzerland.
The complainant reiterates that his past experiences of torture caused him severe mental suffering and physical injuries.
In relation to her political activities in Switzerland, the complainant reiterates that she has been a member of KSOS since October 2007 and is a cantonal representative.
The complainant reiterates that if he is returned to Azerbaijan, he will be arrested for his political beliefs, and tortured.
In a letter dated 19 January 2007, the complainant reiterates that detention conditions in Pakistani prisons are inhuman.
The complainant reiterates that her family has attempted to use existing legal channels, but that all their efforts have proved to be ineffective, and that, to this day, the family of Mounir Hammouche continues to be denied its right to justice.
On the merits of the case, the complainant reiterates his arguments on the risk of torture in abstracto in the general Algerian context.
The complainant reiterates that she is a very active member of the dissident movement of Ethiopians in Switzerland and that she had met Birtukan Mideksa before her arrest.
Referring to the initial communication, the complainant reiterates that the Tunisian authorities refused to investigate her complaint or even to accept that it should be examined.
The complainant reiterates that she was harassed in Ethiopia and states that she has been consistent in her allegations on this issue.
In relation to his personal circumstances, the complainant reiterates that he faces a foreseeable, real and personal risk of torture if he is returned to Bangladesh.
The complainant reiterates that the violence inflicted upon him constituted torture as defined in article 1 of the Convention.
In relation to his personal circumstances, the complainant reiterates that he faces a foreseeable, real and personal risk of torture if he is returned to Bangladesh.
The complainant reiterates his arguments about the personal risks that he would run, and the general human rights situation in Iran.
In additional comments submitted on 29 September 2009, the complainant reiterates that, throughout the extradition process, he stood by his claim that he had been tortured in 1998 and that this has never been questioned by the Canadian authorities.
The complainant reiterates that he did experience problems between 1985 and 1994, and that this constitutes evidence that the Iranian authorities continue to view him with suspicion.
Regarding the arguments about his political activities in Switzerland, the complainant reiterates the points made in his initial communication and adds that the State party is unaware which of those Iranians who took part in public political demonstrations have or have not been identified by the Iranian authorities.
The complainant reiterates that he had taken his challenge against the extradition order as far as the Supreme Court, beyond which there were no further domestic remedies.
On 11 July 2007, the complainant reiterates the events that lead to her and her husband's departure from Azerbaijan.
Lastly, the complainant reiterates his allegations regarding the conditions of detention of the alleged victims as described in the initial complaint.
Regarding the merits of the communication, the complainant reiterates that his brother's extradition to Uzbekistan would lead to a violation by the State party of his brother's rights under article 3 of the Convention.
The complainant reiterates that the above appeals have no prospect of succeeding, because the Migration Police decision is based on the provisions of article 12, paragraphs 4 and 5, of the refugee law and the courts have already reviewed and considered those grounds when reviewing the decision of the Commission see para. 7.4 above.
On 24 April 2009, the complainant reiterates her earlier conclusions and asks the Committee to ignore the State party's observations.
The complainant reiterates that asylum should be granted to victims of past torture, regardless of the risk that they would be subjected to torture upon return to their country of origin.