Примеры использования Comprehensive convention should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The draft comprehensive convention should supplement rather than supplant the sectoral conventions. .
Some other delegations underlined that no cause can justify terrorism, andit was further stated that the comprehensive convention should not exclude criminal acts on the basis of self-determination.
The draft comprehensive convention should not conflate such situations of armed conflict with others.
However, the Coordinator had emphasized that it was in the nature of negotiations that not all views expressed about what the draft comprehensive convention should contain had found their way into the draft as it currently stood and not all approaches that had been espoused had been accommodated.
A comprehensive convention should criminalize acts of terrorism by a State, including its military forces.
Moreover, it was noted that, as had been emphasized by the 2005 World Summit Outcome, the draft comprehensive convention needed to be finalizedas soon as possible, and the work on the draft comprehensive convention should not be detracted by the discussion on the high-level conference.
At the same time, the draft comprehensive convention should aim only to fill the gaps that existed in the current instruments.
A comprehensive convention should also draw a clear distinction between terrorism and the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination.
On the question of the relationship between the draft convention and sectoral conventions, several delegations reiterated their view that the draft comprehensive convention should not supersede or override the sectoral instruments but rather add value by filling the gaps in the latter.
The comprehensive convention should fill the gaps left by existing sectoral anti-terrorism conventions. .
Other delegations took the view that the comprehensive convention should be elaborated as a matter of urgency to eliminate shortcomings in the existing legal regime.
The comprehensive convention should not equate terrorism with the legitimate struggle of peoples for self-determination and self-defence in the face of foreign aggression and occupation.
Some delegations pointed out that the comprehensive convention should bring added value to the existing sectoral conventions, while at the same time preserving their acquis.
The comprehensive convention should provide a clear definition of terrorism, as distinguished from the right of peoples under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations to legitimate self-defence against foreign occupation.
On the other hand, the sphere of application of any future comprehensive convention should not be so narrow as to exclude acts of violence that displayed all the characteristics of the crime of terrorism.
Above all, the comprehensive convention should be an instrument that would enable concrete progress to be made and enhance effective cooperation in the struggle against international terrorism.
Several delegations reiterated their views that a comprehensive convention should contain a clear definition of terrorism and distinguish it from the legitimate struggle of peoples against foreign occupation.
The comprehensive convention should make it possible to move forward in the codification of international law and should not simply be an optional protocol which extended the prosecute-or-extradite provisions to areas not currently covered by sectoral instruments.
It was asserted that the draft comprehensive convention should aim at closing all the loopholes that currently exist in the various sectoral multilateral anti-terrorism instruments.
Consequently, a comprehensive convention should be drawn up regulating the prevention of harm and the corrective measures to be taken, especially for the elimination of the harm and the compensation of those affected.
It had also been argued that a draft comprehensive convention should cover all existing legal gaps and situations, including acts by armed forces of a State which were not governed by international humanitarian law.
The draft comprehensive convention should not become a fool's bargain; his delegation could not agree to hand over the tools of suppression to States which would then be able to define certain acts as acts of terrorism depending on their own strength and interests of the moment.
Some delegations reiterated the view that the comprehensive convention should contain a definition of terrorism clearly distinguishing it from the legitimate struggle of peoples against foreign occupation in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
The draft comprehensive convention should become a vital enforcement instrument in joint counter-terrorism efforts.
It was observed that the comprehensive convention should be regarded as a law enforcement instrument and, therefore, it would constitute an important tool in the fight against terrorism, strengthening and complementing the existing legal framework.
The discussion of the text of the comprehensive convention should be transparent, but the coordinator's document was not conducive to transparency and would lead only to complications and unnecessary procedural arguments at an important stage of the negotiations.
In the long term, therefore, a comprehensive convention should be elaborated in order to eradicate impunity by covering all crimes committed by United Nations personnel and experts on missions, with the exception of military members of national contingents.
Some delegations emphasized that the comprehensive convention should avoid creating legal overlaps with the existing body of anti-terrorism conventions and should represent an added value in relation to the sectoral conventions by increasing their efficiency.
Furthermore, some speakers considered that the comprehensive convention should include provisions relating to military activities not covered by international humanitarian law, and apply to individuals in a position to control or direct such military activities.
Those delegations expressed the view that a universal comprehensive convention should be developed in a balanced manner with the aim of finding solutions for existing issues, giving legal binding status to the principles on outer space and supplementing provisions of the existing United Nations treaties on outer space.