Примеры использования Court cited на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Court cited article 1 of the International Law Commission draft articles on this point.
In its supporting analysis, the Constitutional Court cited article 20(3) of the Rome Statute.
Furthermore, the Court cited a lack of evidence of any direct threat to the applicant.
In deciding that it nonetheless had jurisdiction to entertain the action in rem the High Court cited Section 45 of the 1996 Act mirroring Article II(3) NYC.
The court cited the multiplicity of cases and the staff insufficiency as a motive for the denial.
As authority for determining the international standard of interpretation of this contractual clause, the court cited both German and English case law and authorities.
In support of this statement the court cited art. 4 CISG but does not otherwise elaborate its reasoning.
The court cited both"thorny issues" of implicit consent and the absurdity of asserting the transferability of a license that, by the definition of its terms, was nontransferable.
She was charged with having undertakenpropaganda against the State, and during her trial in February 2012 the court cited her attendance at overseas conferences on women's rights.
The Court cited only the articles as proof of Ms. Uwimana's intent to incite the population against the authorities.
In its advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, the Court cited international humanitarian law as the prime example of treaties applicable in armed conflict.
The Court cited the woman's age, 55, and her health as the reasons for its decision to release her. Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 31 October; also referred to in The Jerusalem Times, 3 November.
In the case of Cr.C. 31077-05-10 The State of Israel v. Asama Duad(4.9.2011),the Petah Tikvah Magistrate's Court cited the severity of the polygamy offence and the need to achieve public deterrence by imposing severe punishments.
The Court cited the judgment in Quinn Supermarket Ltd. v. Attorney General[1972] IR 1 which found that"the primary purpose of the guarantee against discrimination is to ensure the freedom of practice of religion.
In finding that habeas corpus is an essential judicial guarantee of the non-derogable rights enumerated in article 27, andtherefore is itself non-derogable, the Court cited the special role that habeas corpus plays in any system governed by the rule of law.
In reaching its judgement, the Court cited in its support CLOUT Case 337, Germany, Landgericht Saabrücken, 26 March 1996.
Regarding the facts, the Court notes that both before and after the granting of the initial environmental authorization, Uruguay did undertake activities aimed at consulting the affected populations, both on the Argentine andthe Uruguayan sides of the river… The Court cited some examples of activities that were carried out.
Most notably, the Supreme Court cited the judgement of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case of Almonacid-Arellano et al. v. Chile, reaffirming that the prohibition of crimes against humanity is a rule of jus cogens.
When initially stating that prohibitions against pillage and destruction not justified by military necessity both"exist in customary international law applicable to non-international armed conflict at the times relevant to this case" the Court cited in support an Appeals Chamber decision of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in Hadžihasanović.
The Buga special circuit high court and the Pereira circuit criminal court cited bottlenecks in the judicial system, a heavy workload and the priority given to other decisions to excuse the failure to deliver a judgement.
The court cited article 38(1) CISG which provides for the duty of the buyer to examine the goods as soon as practicable and article 39(1) CISG which provides that the buyer loses the right to rely on a lack of conformity if he does not notify it to the seller within a reasonable time.
On 10 February 2012, the petitioner refers to the jurisprudence of the German Constitutional Court cited by the position paper of GIHR(see para. 8.3), which states that if statements depict foreigners as inferior, for example, through the generalized attribution of socially unacceptable behaviour or characteristics, freedom of expression cannot prevail over human dignity.
The court cited with approval another court's statement that"an affirmative opt-out requirement promotes uniformity and the observance of good faith in international trade, two principles that guide interpretation of the CISG.
As examples of the former obligations the Court cited those deriving from the outlawing of acts of aggression and of genocide and from the principles and rules of international law concerning the basic rights of the human person, including protection from slavery and racial discrimination.
The court cited the relevant provision of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, which prohibits refugees from being returned to frontiers of territories where their lives may be threatened on grounds of nationality or membership in a social group.
Branch 26 of Tehran's Revolutionary Court cited articles 500, 610 and 19 of the Islamic Penal Code as the basis for its ruling, listing charges such as"assembly and collusion with the intent to commit a crime against national security, and propagating against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The Court cited examples of extraterritorial acts recognized as constituting an exercise of jurisdiction, namely extradition or expulsion of a person by a Contracting State, acts of the authorities of a Contracting State which produced effects or were performed outside their own territory or where a Contracting State, as a consequence of military action, exercised effective control of an area outside its national territory.
Consonant with Sec. 2, Art. 11 of the Constitution,the Supreme Court cited the Convention that prohibits discrimination against women with respect to terms and conditions of employment as the basis of corrective labor and social laws where the services of a female employee were terminated because she contracted marriage during employment Supreme Court Reports Annotated[SCRA] 1997.
Furthermore, the court cited the medical expert that"the location of the scratches does not exclude their formation following the victim's resistance", whereas it ignored another conclusion of the expert that the scratches could have been self-inflicted, as her son himself declared during the pre-trial investigation.
In deciding on the case, the Court cited Article 23 of Recommendations of ILO Convention No. 165 of 1981 concerning workers with family responsibilities which provides that"it should be possible for a worker, man or woman, with family responsibilities in relation to a dependent child to obtain leave of absence in the case of its illness.