Примеры использования Decisions violating на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Constitutional Court has competence to review the legality of administrative regulations and decisions violating fundamental rights.
The Act on appeal to the courts against acts and decisions violating citizens' rights and freedoms of 30 August 1995, which sets out in detail the procedure for implementing article 44 of the Constitution.
Citizens are accorded the right to seek redress in court for violation ofrights not only by the Constitution and the Court Appeals(Acts and Decisions Violating Civil Rights and Liberties) Act, but also by other legislative acts.
The provisions of the Court Appeals(Acts and Decisions Violating Civil Rights and Liberties) Act were further elaborated in the Code of Civil Procedure adopted on 30 August 1997.
On 10 December 2009, a round-table discussion was held on procedure for consideration by the courts andthe law enforcement agencies of communications submitted under the Citizens' Applications Act and the act dealing with appeal to the courts against acts and decisions violating civil rights and freedoms.
The Court Appeals(Acts and Decisions Violating Citizens' Rights and Freedoms) Act establishes two routes for appealing such actions: the judicial route and the administrative route.
For purposes of carrying out those Constitutional provisions, the following are in place:the law on lodging complaints in court regarding actions and decisions violating the rights and freedoms of citizens of 30 August 1995, the law on citizens' recourse(revised) of 13 December 2002, and the Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
In the case of actions or decisions violating constitutional human or civil rights or freedoms, a person is entitled to bring a complaint before a higher body, a higher ranking official, a procurator or, directly, a court.
Besides the administrative procedure for considering complaints from citizens about illegal actions by State orlocal government bodies or officials there is also a judicial one established by the Actions and Decisions Violating Civil Rights and Liberties(Court Appeals Against) Act of 27 April 1993, in the version approved by federal Act of 14 December 1995.
The Court Appeals(Acts and Decisions Violating Citizens' Rights and Freedoms) Act establishes guarantees of the protection of the rights of the individual in the event of unlawful acts by executive authorities.
The Centre provides the public with full, reliable information, over the Internet and by other means, on the state of the environment and on planned and current activities that could have a significant impact on the environment, andgives members of the public an opportunity to appeal against decisions violating public rights under the provisions of the Aarhus Convention, especially in the territory of the Ural-Caspian Basin.
The Government included a copy of the Complaints(Actions and Decisions Violating the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens) Act as well as judicial statistics for the period 1993 to 1999 in an annex to its reply.
The participants noted that the introduction of international standards concerning the right of appeal and to court protection in national legislation, and the procedures for considering citizens' applications in the agencies of the procuratorial, internal affairs andjustice systems that have mechanisms for receiving legal aid promote the use of the courts' powers to consider appeals against acts and decisions violating civil rights and freedoms.
Under the Court Appeals(Acts and Decisions Violating Citizens' Rights and Freedoms) Act, a complaint may be filed with a court if a child's rights or freedoms are violated or their realization is impeded.
Victims of torture may exercise their inalienable rights under a whole range of laws and regulations, including the Criminal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Code for the Execution of Criminal Penalties, the Citizens' Appeals Act No. 1064-XIIof 6 May 1994, the Court Complaints(Actions and Decisions Violating Citizens' Rights and Freedoms) Act No. 108-I of 30 August 1995 and the Supreme Court Plenary Decision of 2 May 1997 on court judgements.
A series of procedural safeguards, such as the Complaints(Actions and Decisions Violating the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens) Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Constitution and the Federal Constitutional Law on the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, exist to ensure that citizens whose rights have been violated may exercise their right to a judicial remedy.
The Court Appeals(Acts and Decisions Violating Citizens' Rights and Freedoms) Act of 30 August 1995 establishes the right of citizens to appeal to a court if they believe that their rights and freedoms have been violated by unlawful acts or decisions of State bodies, enterprises, institutions, organizations, voluntary associations, self-governing bodies of citizens, or officials.
In practice, public authorities usually comply with the obligation to inform in a adequate, timely and effective manner,because courts are very strict and quash decisions violating even one requirement on notification e.g. revoking a decision about a waste incineration plant where the competent authority, while having made available the information in other required ways, did not publicize it on its website provincial administrative court verdict z 8.09.2004 IISA/PO 807/02.
In accordance with the Court Appeals(Acts and Decisions Violating Civil Rights and Liberties) Act, all citizens of Uzbekistan, regardless of race and ethnicity, and aliens and stateless persons may bring complaints before the courts if they consider that their rights and freedoms have been violated through the unlawful actions(or decisions) of State bodies, enterprises, institutions, organizations, voluntary associations, local authorities or officials art. 1.
Under article 44 of the Constitution andarticles 1 and 3 of the Court Appeals(Acts and Decisions Violating Civil Rights and Liberties) Act, appeals may be lodged in court against any acts or decisions by State bodies, enterprises, institutions, organizations, voluntary associations or officials other than those that only the Constitutional Court is competent to try.
In accordance with the Act on legal Recourse against Actions and Decisions Violating the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens, all citizens of the Republic of Uzbekistan, irrespective of race or nationality, and also aliens and stateless persons shall be entitled to submit complaints to the courts, if they consider that their rights and freedoms have been breached through the unlawful actions(decisions) of State agencies, enterprises, institutions, organizations, public associations, local authorities or officials art. 1.
The Act(of 30 August 1995) dealing with appeal to the courts against acts and decisions violating civil rights and freedoms establishes the right of citizens to enter an appeal if they consider that one of their rights or freedoms has been infringed by an lawful act or decision of a State agency, enterprise, establishment or organization, by a civil society or other voluntary organization or by an official.
The author argued that this decision violated articles 2 and 25 of ICCPR.
In accordance with the Code, members of the public without distinction could challenge any decision violating the right to public participation or national laws relating to the environment.
In addition to kowtowing to terrorism and separatism, this decision violates the constitutional and legal order of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and its economic, financial-monetary and customs systems.
The Constitutional Court may cancel a final decision if it finds that the decision violates a fundamental right or freedom safeguarded by constitutional legislation.
It also decides on constitutional complaints filed against individual decisions of state administrative bodies, units of local and regional self-government andlegal persons vested with public powers, when such decisions violate human rights and basic freedoms and the right to local and regional self-government.
This decision violated his right to have this"trial" conducted in a language he understands, his right to equal legal protection without discrimination and the principle of equality of arms according to articles 2, article 14, paragraph 1 and article 26 of the Covenant.
A violation of public policy could only be assumed if a decision violated a norm, which governed the fundamental rules of political and economic life or if it was in unbearable conflict with the German notion of justice.
This decision violated the logic underlying the order of exposition of the rules and provisions of the Act and eliminated the most important mechanism of government regulation, namely, prevention of the unjustified pollution of the atmosphere, which can lead to a sharp uncontrolled decline in air quality.