Примеры использования Delegation supported option на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
His delegation supported option 1 for article 7.
With regard to the role of the Prosecutor, his delegation supported option 1 for article 12.
His delegation supported option 1 for paragraph 2.
With regard to the role of the Security Council, her delegation supported option 1 for article 10 1.
Her delegation supported option 2 for article 11 3.
As to what States must be parties oraccept jurisdiction, his delegation supported option 1 for article 7, which was already a compromise.
His delegation supported option 1 for article 12 on the role of the Prosecutor.
With regard to the Chairman's second question, his delegation supported option 1 for article 7 and was also in favour of article 7 ter.
His delegation supported option 1 in respect of treaty crimes.
With regard to the States that had to be parties to the Statute orto have accepted jurisdiction before the Court could exercise jurisdiction, his delegation supported option 1 for article 7, and article 7 ter regarding acceptance by non-parties.
Mr. SKILLEN(Australia) said that his delegation supported option 2 for article 104 for the reasons given by the delegation of Denmark.
His delegation supported option 1 for article 10 on the role of the Security Council and option 1 for article 12 on the Prosecutor.
With regard to the role of the Security Council, his delegation supported option 1 for article 10(1) and was opposed to option 1 for article 11 3.
His delegation supported option 1 in the war crimes chapeau but would be prepared to accept option 2 if a consensus emerged.
Mr. HAMAD AL-SAADI(Oman)said his delegation supported option 4 in both article 108 and article 109.
His delegation supported option 2 under article 1(1) of the draft rules(A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.169, para. 8), to the effect that the rules would apply where expressly provided for by the treaty under which investor-State arbitration was initiated.
Mr. SOARES da GAMA(Guinea-Bissau)said that his delegation supported option 1 for article 6 concerning automatic jurisdiction with respect to genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.
Mr. NEGA(Ethiopia) said his delegation supported option 2 in article 6 and consequently, regarding the proprio motu power of the Prosecutor, option 2 for article 12.
Several delegations supported Option 1 as proposed by the United Kingdom in INF.24 but other delegations opposed the idea that the secretariat should place sample ADR driver training certificates from each country on its website.
A few delegations supported option 4, which would limit application to firearms that had been illegally manufactured and traded.
His delegation therefore supported option 1 in article 5 quater.
Her delegation strongly supported option 1 for article 7 bis.
For article 7 bis, his delegation likewise supported option 1, providing for automatic jurisdiction over all three core crimes.
Mr. SCHEFFER(United States of America) said that his delegation strongly supported option 2 for article 6 for reasons already explained.
With regard to exercise of jurisdiction, her delegation strongly supported option 1 for article 6(c), in conjunction with the safeguards provided in article 12.
Mr. BARTON(Slovakia) said that his delegation supported article 20 with option 1 for paragraph 1 c.
His delegation supported the multi-year payment option as that gave Member States the opportunity to satisfy their obligations to the Organization.
His delegation strongly supported option 1 for article 12 referring to the proprio motu power of the Prosecutor to initiate proceedings and believed the safeguards contained therein were sufficient, in conjunction with those provided for in articles 47 and 48 of the draft Statute.
The Prosecutor should have the power to initiate proceedings proprio motu; his delegation therefore supported option 1 for article 6 and option 2 for article 11.
Mr. KIM Chong-Hoon(Republic of Korea) said that, recognizing the importance ofsecurity enhancements at the VIC and of the sharing of responsibility by all Member States for taking the necessary measures to that end, his delegation supported the option of using supplementary appropriations to finance the first phase of the enhancements.