Примеры использования Delegations cautioned на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Delegations cautioned that these roles, however, may also vary in accordance with the circumstances.
While draft principle 4 allowed scope for States to place conditions, limitations orexceptions on liability, some delegations cautioned against such a possibility being used to eschew payment of compensation to the victim.
Some delegations cautioned that a green economy needs to be adapted to national circumstances.
Generally speaking, this text, which in the view of the Special Rapporteur provides significant clarification,was approved both in the original version adopted in 1998 and in 1999, although some delegations cautioned against a practice that had to be governed by specific rules, which the Commission would obviously have to consider when taking up the crucial question of the permissibility of reservations.
But other delegations cautioned that existing provisions should not be deleted absent compelling reasons.
Люди также переводят
With regard to the Office's role in natural disasters, several delegations cautioned that this should not be at the expense of its core mandate; that it should be subject to the consent of the Government concerned; and that it should not entail any diversion of funding from core mandate activities.
Delegations cautioned UNDP to undertake direct budget support within the parameters of its strategic plan and the limits of its expertise.
On the substance, were the Commission to proceed with the consideration of oil and gas resources, some delegations cautioned against addressing questions concerning maritime delimitation, which were better dealt with in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by the States concerned and/or by competent judicial bodies, including the International Court of Justice, or existing bilateral mechanisms.
Some delegations cautioned against the possibility that UNOPS could become involved in more than executing activities, warning that a new United Nations agency should not be created.
In view of the numerous treaties that had been concluded containing Most-Favoured-Nation clauses, some delegations cautioned against any attempts at making them uniform, noting further that Most-Favoured-Nation provisions were a product of specific treaty formation, tended to differ considerably in their structure, scope and language and were dependent on other provisions in the specific agreements in which they were located.
Some delegations cautioned that it was also important not to create disincentives for industry and private-sector participation.
Other delegations cautioned against drawing a distinction between the provisions applicable in respect of combatants and civilians.
Other delegations cautioned that continuous changes to its rules of procedure cause uncertainties for coastal States preparing their submissions.
Moreover, some delegations cautioned against revisiting draft articles that had already been thoroughly addressed and which enjoyed general agreement.
While some delegations cautioned against elaborating a convention in this area, the view was expressed that the development of draft articles might be appropriate.
Many delegations cautioned that the concept of eco-labelling and related issues were still under discussion in the Committee on Trade and Environment of the World Trade Organization.
Several delegations cautioned that commercial viability might not coincide with the importance of a publication to Member States, especially methodological and technical publications.
Some delegations cautioned against the use of double standards in countering terrorism, while the point was also made that"State terrorism" was an abhorrent form of terrorism.
Some delegations cautioned against a substantive discussion on article 121, which might lead to reopening discussions on other articles of the Convention and altering its delicate balance.
Other delegations cautioned against a"one size fits all" approach, but agreed that measures needed to be adopted to ensure that the number of sharks caught corresponded to the number of fins landed.
However, other delegations cautioned that such a target would be unrealistic in that it could only be attained with a significant increase over the present level of core resources.
Many delegations cautioned that repeated failures to adopt a programme of work add to the sense of frustration with the Conference, and that therefore a fresh attempt should be made only when there is a reasonable chance of succeeding.
Some delegations cautioned against excluding topics simply because they fell within the mandate of other forums, and noted that the Consultative Process was intended to strengthen collective, coordinated and integrated approaches.
Some delegations cautioned that any reconfiguration or drawdown of MINUSTAH should not lead to the reversal of gains made in the country and that there should be a gradual and orderly transfer of responsibilities to the Government of Haiti.
In general, many delegations cautioned against the risk that economic partnership agreements, as they currently stood, could generate asymmetric benefits to the parties unless the key concerns expressed by some of the signatories were genuinely addressed.
Several delegations cautioned that UN-HABITAT's budget should be kept on a realistic and achievable basis, and should be based on a zero growth principle with respect to its impact on the regular United Nations budget.
Some other delegations cautioned that the study of this topic by the Commission should take into account the balance of competing interests involved, namely, the prevention of impunity on the one hand and the stability of inter-State relations and the protection of the State's ability to perform its functions on the other. 2.
Some delegations cautioned that in implementing the recommendation care must be taken not to infringe upon national sovereignty, and proposed that the question of drafting guidelines for field operations in countries experiencing continuing civil strife should be examined by the Special Committee on Peace-keeping Operations.
One delegation cautioned against dependence on overly sophisticated technology.
However, one delegation cautioned that strict liability should be approached with caution. .