Примеры использования Some delegations cautioned на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some delegations cautioned against characterizing this as a major constraint in itself.
While draft principle 4 allowed scope for States to place conditions, limitations orexceptions on liability, some delegations cautioned against such a possibility being used to eschew payment of compensation to the victim.
Some delegations cautioned against trying to impose restrictions on the freedom of marine scientific research.
However, while many delegations supported the Fund's need to have greater flexibility in using regular resources, some delegations cautioned that regular country programme resources should not be diverted to emergency assistance.
Some delegations cautioned that a green economy needs to be adapted to national circumstances.
Several delegations proposed an evaluation of the costing of ecosystem services and internalizing of environmental externalities as key elements of a green economy,as well as green accounting, while some delegations cautioned against further marketization of nature's services;
In addition, some delegations cautioned against combining the issues of reservations and dispute settlement.
Generally speaking, this text, which in the view of the Special Rapporteur provides significant clarification,was approved both in the original version adopted in 1998 and in 1999, although some delegations cautioned against a practice that had to be governed by specific rules, which the Commission would obviously have to consider when taking up the crucial question of the permissibility of reservations.
Some delegations cautioned that it was also important not to create disincentives for industry and private-sector participation.
While noting that such an interpretation permitted the Special Rapporteur to justify a highly restrictive system of dispute settlement, some delegations cautioned against placing too much reliance on dispute settlement procedures as an ex post corrective to substantive provisions, and believed that care should be taken to provide an equilibrium between ex post and ex ante limitations.
While some delegations cautioned against elaborating a convention in this area, the view was expressed that the development of draft articles might be appropriate.
While commending UN-Women for its work in promoting gender mainstreaming in the post-2015 development agenda, as well as for itsrole in advocacy and in securing widespread consensus in favour of a stand-alone goal on gender equality, some delegations cautioned that combined efforts needed to be maintained to ensure that gender equality would be truly mainstreamed throughout the framework.
Moreover, some delegations cautioned against revisiting draft articles that had already been thoroughly addressed and which enjoyed general agreement.
While recognizing the importance of the issue, some delegations cautioned against the duplication of efforts and pointed to the need for a comprehensive and more balanced approach to combating corruption in all its forms through strengthening good governance and the rule of law.
Some delegations cautioned against the possibility that UNOPS could become involved in more than executing activities, warning that a new United Nations agency should not be created.
On the substance, were the Commission to proceed with the consideration of oil and gas resources, some delegations cautioned against addressing questions concerning maritime delimitation, which were better dealt with in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea by the States concerned and/or by competent judicial bodies, including the International Court of Justice, or existing bilateral mechanisms.
Some delegations cautioned against including property because of its complexity; others said that the Conclusion should deal with physical and material as well as legal safety.
In view of the numerous treaties that had been concluded containing Most-Favoured-Nation clauses, some delegations cautioned against any attempts at making them uniform, noting further that Most-Favoured-Nation provisions were a product of specific treaty formation, tended to differ considerably in their structure, scope and language and were dependent on other provisions in the specific agreements in which they were located.
Some delegations cautioned against the use of double standards in countering terrorism, while the point was also made that"State terrorism" was an abhorrent form of terrorism.
Focusing on national level implementation of the Rio+20 agenda, some delegations cautioned against possible fragmentation among actors and saw the need for tighter links between coordination at the national and global levels, requesting further information on how this is being addressed within the wider principle of national ownership.
Some delegations cautioned, however, that the concept of eco-labelling and related issues are still under consideration by the Committee on Trade and Environment of the World Trade Organization.
Some delegations cautioned against a substantive discussion on article 121, which might lead to reopening discussions on other articles of the Convention and altering its delicate balance.
Some delegations cautioned that complexity might deter donors, particularly the private sector, and noted the need to ensure transparency and avoid the possibility of private deals.
Some delegations cautioned against excluding topics simply because they fell within the mandate of other forums, and noted that the Consultative Process was intended to strengthen collective, coordinated and integrated approaches.
Some delegations cautioned, however, that this coordination should not distract United Nations' efforts for other water and sanitation problems and that the duplication of mechanisms already established by the Government should be avoided.
Some delegations cautioned that any reconfiguration or drawdown of MINUSTAH should not lead to the reversal of gains made in the country and that there should be a gradual and orderly transfer of responsibilities to the Government of Haiti.
Some delegations cautioned that the shift toward performance-based standards in TRAC-2 might demotivate staff from performing complex interventions in favour of simpler projects with easily attainable results.
Some delegations cautioned against discussing matters exclusively related to the draft convention proposed by the Working Group on the use of mercenaries, and suggested that the intergovernmental working group consider other ways of regulating the activities of private military and security companies.
Some delegations cautioned that in implementing the recommendation care must be taken not to infringe upon national sovereignty, and proposed that the question of drafting guidelines for field operations in countries experiencing continuing civil strife should be examined by the Special Committee on Peace-keeping Operations.
Some among those delegations cautioned that the prerogative in question should be limited to cases involving a threat to international peace and security, or to cases involving situations of aggression.