Примеры использования Does not prohibit discrimination на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The basic law in many States does not prohibit discrimination against women.
The law does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of physical, sensory, intellectual, or mental disability.
The report points out that the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sex.
The Committee is concerned that societal discrimination persists against vulnerable groups of children, including children living in poverty, Haitian immigrant children andchildren with disabilities and that the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of disability.
It also noted that Tuvaluan law does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairment.
It was recalled that“the HREOC Act does not guarantee rights and does not prohibit discrimination.
Yet the law in Spain not only does not prohibit discrimination on grounds of sex where succession to noble titles is concerned, it positively requires it.
As disclosed earlier in this report,the Bill of Rights provision on discrimination does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender or sex.
For example, the trade principle of national treatment does not prohibit discrimination against nationals even if the national good, service or service provider might be in a weaker position comparatively.
The Constitution of Jamaica, while prohibiting discrimination on a number of grounds including race and religion, does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sex.
However, it is concerned that the legislation of the State party does not prohibit discrimination in accordance with article 1 of the Convention and that there is no Law on gender equality.
Article 64 does not prohibit discrimination on the basis of language, social origin, disability, family or birth or other status."Discrimination" is not defined in the Constitution or any other Cook Islands law, nor is the concept of"indirect discrimination" specifically defined.
CRC was concerned that societal discrimination persists against girls and women and vulnerable groups of children, such as children with disabilities, living in poverty, born out of wedlock, adopted, and of mixed parentage,and that the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of disability.
According to the ILO Committee of Experts in 2008,the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of political opinion, colour and sex, nor does it apply to acts of discrimination by a private employer.
The Committee is concerned that, as noted by the State party, societal discrimination persists against girls and vulnerable groups of children, including children living in poverty, Amerindian children and children with disabilities,and that the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of disability.
As indicated in the State party's report, the law does not prohibit discrimination against the disabled specifically, there is no law mandating accessibility for persons with disabilities and existing legislation with regard to children with disabilities is not implemented;
The Committee is concerned that, as noted by the State party, societal discrimination persists against girls and women and vulnerable groups of children, such as children with disabilities, children living in poverty, children born out of wedlock, adopted children and children of mixed parentage,and that the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of disability.
The Committee is concerned that legislation in the State party does not prohibit discrimination against women, in line with article 1 of the Convention covering both direct and indirect discrimination, or extending this to acts of both public and private actors in accordance with article 2.
The Committee is concerned that the Constitution, which recognizes women's right to equality before the law and guarantees the fundamental rights and freedoms of all individuals, does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sex, and that there is no legislative definition of"discrimination against women" reflecting article 1 of the Convention, which prohibits both direct and indirect discrimination. .
CRC was concerned at the societal discrimination experienced by children with disabilities and that the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of disability, at the inaccessibility of buildings and transportation for them and the absence of an inclusive policy, and particularly that children with disabilities in less populated islands suffer particular disadvantage regarding access to services.
In 2008, the ILO Committee of Experts noted that for a number of years,the Committee has expressed its concern that the 1992 Labour Code does not prohibit discrimination on grounds of race, colour or national extraction, as required by article 1(1)(a) of the ILO Convention concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation No. 111.
However, the Act did not prohibit discrimination based on citizenship or language.
It noted that legislation did not prohibit discrimination against women, and also noted continued occurrences of FGM and forced early marriage.
As for the amendment to article 8(2) of the Constitution, it did not prohibit discrimination against women by non-State actors.
In its previous comments, the Committee had concluded that this provision did not prohibit discrimination at the recruitment stage.
Mr. SICILIANOS(Country Rapporteur)said that legislation in the State party did not prohibit discrimination based on descent or national origin.
CERD was concerned that the Constitution did not prohibit discrimination on grounds of race and that the Criminal Code and its proposed amendment did not provide a definition of racial discrimination in conformity with the Convention.
It also drew to the Government's attention that article 18 of the Constitution did not prohibit discrimination on the basis of race and colour and that it does not appear to protect non-nationals from discrimination on the grounds listed in the Convention, which may leave the many foreign workers living in the country without legal protection from such treatment.
CEDAW was concerned, however, that the Constitution, which recognizes women's right to equality before the law and guarantees the fundamental rights andfreedoms of all individuals, did not prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sex, and that there was no legislative definition of"discrimination against women" reflecting article 1 of the Convention, which prohibits both direct and indirect discrimination. .
In 2009, the ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of the Conventions and Recommendations(ILO Committee of Experts)noted that section 10 of the Employment Contracts Act did not prohibit discrimination based on national extraction, colour and social origin and requested Estonia to address discrimination in employment and occupation on all the grounds mentioned in the International Labour Organization Convention No. 111(1958) concerning Discrimination in Respect of Employment and Occupation.