Примеры использования Group would have на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The President clarified that the group would have a limited mandate.
The Working Group would have welcomed the cooperation of the Government.
The Province of Canada was divided into Ontario andQuebec so that each linguistic group would have its own province.
I was thinking that the age group would have more insight and understanding.
The group would have had storefront shops and have participated in the installation of E-zone Sega(game-centers) Indonesia.
Yasushi Akimoto announced that the group would have 26 trainees for the first generation.
Each group would collect prices according to a common set of guidelines andfollowing a common timetable, but each group would have its own product lists.
The drafting group would have to consider how to marry those proposals.
At the beginning of these discussions, the Chairperson-Rapporteur said that the working group would have an opportunity to consider substantive proposals.
The Working Group would have welcomed the cooperation of the Government.
How can we speak of the need to take equitable geographical distribution into account if, as a result of the exercise,we are faced with a Council in which a single geographical group would have four permanent members?
The Working Group would have welcomed the cooperation of the Government of Saudi Arabia.
Not all recommendations made by the working group would have the full support of his Government.
The Working Group would have welcomed the cooperation of the Government of Saudi Arabia.
In the light of the allegations made, the Working Group would have welcomed the cooperation of the Government.
The Working Group would have welcomed the cooperation of the two Governments concerned.
If the Economic and Social Council were to establish an ad hoc advisory group on Somalia to examine the humanitarian and economic needs of the country and review relevant assistance programmes and prepare recommendations for the rehabilitation, reconstruction anddevelopment of Somalia, such a group would have an important role to play in supporting the peace process in the country.
It was explained that the Working Group would have to consider a number of different issues.
Each Task Group would have a dedicated Task Group Leader who would remain in post, ideally for the whole period of the four year intersessional programme.
In this situation,any decision by the Working Group would have to be based on assumptions, conjectures and surmises.
This working group would have a precise schedule and would be time-limited and could later become a preparatory committee per se.
Mr. Pulido León(Venezuela) said that the Group of 77 and China, in a spirit of flexibility, could accept the proposal made by the representative of Denmark and supported by the representative of the United States that the Committee should hear an introduction by the Chairmanof the Advisory Committee, and also by the Secretariat, on the understanding that the Group would have an opportunity to respond at a subsequent formal meeting.
Clearly, a working group would have to consider the matter in greater detail and submit draft revised provisions.
Such a group would have two main merits: it would provide a venue for collective learning, and it would enable an interactive debate amongst Governments and other stakeholders.
The Group had in mind the functions assigned to it in paragraph 44 of the terms of reference, according to which the Group would have an overview of the review process in order to identify challenges and good practices and to consider technical assistance requirements in order to ensure effective implementation of the Convention.
Such a group would have a broad and flexible mandate that would enable it to consider all matters relating to reform of the Council, as set out in the report of the Secretary-General A/48/264 and Add.1-4.
Experts of this Group would have the knowledge to address legal issues arising from the work programme of UN/CEFACT.
This Working Group would have two subgroups: one of them would aim to deliver guiding principles and/or recommended practices on transparency, non-discrimination, due process, effectiveness of enforcement procedures and institutions, and international cooperation on anti-cartel enforcement; the second would aim to help competition authorities improve their enforcement techniques.
Decided that the Working Group would have at its disposal 10 days(or 20 three-hour meetings) of fully serviced meetings;
The Working Group would have to consider those issues in order to give guidelines to the informal group. .