Примеры использования Had not substantiated на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Board concluded that the complainant had not substantiated his claim that he risked persecution.
He thus had not substantiated that Jordanian authorities or others in that country were interested in him on grounds such as political opinion.
Moreover it pointed out that the Government of Turkey had not substantiated their arguments disputing the applicant's victim status.
The State party contested the admissibility of the communication on the basis that the domestic remedies had not been exhausted;it also considered that the complainant had not substantiated his claims.
The author contests the State party's submission that she had not substantiated that her son had been"placed in an inappropriate measure.
However, the author had not substantiated her assertion that she had been struck from the national registration of citizens and lost her Chinese citizenship.
The Supreme Court accepted the State's argument that she had not substantiated her claim for malice. Ha'aretz, 24 May.
The Committee considered that the author had not substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, his claim under articles 7 and 17 of the Covenant, and that his claims under articles 9 and 13 of the Covenant were incompatible with these provisions.
As regards the author's complaint relating to prison conditions in Canada, the Committee found that the author had not substantiated this claim, for purposes of admissibility.
The Committee therefore concluded that the author had not substantiated his claim regarding the risk of removal from Romania to Moldova and declared the communication inadmissible for lack of substantiation.
Considering the authors' effective participation in the parliamentary elections in 2005,the Committee noted that they had not substantiated any past violation of their rights protected under the Covenant.
In light of this,the Committee concluded that the complainant had not substantiated his claim that he would face a foreseeable, real and personal risk of being subjected to torture upon his return to the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
With regard to the allegation of torture since his return to Zacatecas prison, the State party submitted that the complainant had not substantiated his claim or furnished any details to support it.
Nevertheless, the Migration Court found that the complainant had not substantiated her claim that she risked being subjected to persecution, ill-treatment or punishment if she returned to Burundi.
As to hypothetical violations of Mr. Cox's rights to a fair trial, the State party recalls that the Committee declared the communication inadmissible with respect to articles 14 and 26 of the Covenant,since the author had not substantiated his allegations for purposes of admissibility.
On 3 March 2010, the complainant observed that the State party had not substantiated its request that the Committee should find the complaint inadmissible.
Although the survey of recruitment practices in the public and private sectors had revealed that Indians were under-represented at the highest levels of the public sector for historical and cultural reasons,the available evidence had not substantiated allegations of racial discrimination.
The Board concluded that the conditions of recognizing the author as a refugee had not been met and that he had not substantiated that he came from a country or an area where he would risk abuse on an individual or a general basis.
The Committee found that the author had not substantiated her claim, for purposes of admissibility, that the failure of the courts in this respect was arbitrary, or that the Government's failure to examine the constitutionality of Law No. 143/1947 constituted a violation of article 14 1.
That matter was already dealt with separately in the Declaration on Prevention of Genocide; in any event,the Commission of Inquiry had not substantiated any of the allegations of genocide and the Committee should respect its findings.
The Committee considered that the author had not substantiated his generalized claim that none of the judges of the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court could deal with his case impartially, since all were influenced by the Chief Justice.
In its Views on communication No. 103/1998(A and B v. Sweden), the Committee considered that the authors,nationals of the Islamic Republic of Iran, had not substantiated their claim that they would risk being subjected to torture if they were returned to their country.
In these particular circumstances, the Committee found that the author had not substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, his claim that his right under article 14, paragraph 5, was violated and that, therefore, his deportation from Canada entailed a violation by Canada of article 6 of the Covenant.
Similarly, the Committee found that the author's claim of a violation of article 14 on the ground that the evidence against her son was fabricated,was likewise inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol as the author had not substantiated a claim of bias or misconduct by the court.
Whilst noting with concern reports of human rights violations in Iran,the Committee considered that the complainant had not substantiated that she would personally face such a real and imminent risk of being subjected to torture upon return to Iran.
The Court moreover found that Argentina had not substantiated its allegation that Uruguay's decision to carry out major eucalyptus planting operations to supply the raw material for the Orion(Botnia) mill had had an impact not only on management of the soil and Uruguayan woodland, but also on the quality of the waters of the river.
In the same Views, the Committee observed that article 3 only covered situations of torture as defined in article 1 of the Convention; and, with regard to the author's claim under article 16,it held that the author had not substantiated his allegation that the decision to remove him and his family to his country of origin would in itself amount to an act of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
The State party submits that the Regional Court andthe High Court found that the author had not substantiated his claims that JD was disseminating false, misleading or defamatory information about him; he was merely exercising his right to petition.
The State party invokes the Committee's decision Deidrick v. Jamaica, where the complainant was held on death row for over eight years, was confined to his cell for 22 hours a day, spent most of his time in enforced darkness, andwhere the Committee held that the complainant had not substantiated specific circumstances that could raise an issue under articles 7 and 10, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, and that this part of his complaint was inadmissible.
The Committee considered that the allegation of violation of article 3 of the Convention was vague and general,that the complainant had not substantiated that he faced a personal and actual risk of being tortured if extradited to Algeria and that, accordingly, his extradition would not constitute a violation of article 3 of the Covenant.