Примеры использования Joint assets на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Split-up of joint assets.
My client will pay no alimony, he will retain his pension andacquire half of the joint assets.
Management of their joint assets is a matter for both spouses.
Prohibit the unilateral disposition of joint assets;
The partners may have joint assets and their own property.
Joint assets may be managed under the laws of Hungary by either member of the married couple.
In June 2006 experts estimated the joint assets of the Klyuyev brothers to be $144 million.
The inheritance rights of a living spouse do not cover his orher share of the spouses' joint assets.
In addition to joint assets, spouses may also have personal assets. .
Therefore, in accordance with IPSAS, UNFPA attributed joint assets and liabilities to segments.
Management of their joint assets is a matter for both spouses. Either may authorize the other to take over sole management of all or some of the assets. .
Therefore, in accordance with IPSAS,UNFPA attributed joint assets and liability to segments.
The joint assets can be defined in a prenuptial agreement(předmanželská smlouva). Prenuptial agreements are made prior to the marriage and must be signed in the presence of a notary.
UNFPA considers cash, cash equivalents and investments as"joint assets" between segments.
Article 21 stipulates the right of the spouses to own,use and decide of joint assets, Article 22- personal property of souses.
This provision arises from the substance of common joint property andthe principle of equality between spouses which does not provide more rights to either of the spouses to their joint assets.
Such relations may concern matrimonial relations in respect of joint assets, civil liability arising from property obligations, and maintenance obligations alimony.
Once the grounds for removal disappear, the removed spouse may request the court to allow him or her to manage joint assets again.
Where one of the spouses is away orcannot participate in the management of joint assets for important reasons, the other spouse may apply to court to be authorised to manage such assets alone.
She must prove that the money paid for land was her own before marriage; in other words,she could not use her husband's money or their joint assets to buy land.
Where a spouse is unable to manage joint assets or does that in a way that incurs losses, the other spouse may apply to court with a request to remove the other spouse from the management of assets. .
The Namibian law does not make provision for theregistration of customary marriages, and their unions are therefore not recognised as marriage for legal purposes like obtaining joint assets.
The spouse, whose fines for breaches of law or damages incurred through his orher actions have been paid from joint assets, is obliged to compensate for the decrease in joint common property.
Where the value of common joint property is increased by adding the personal property of one of the spouses,the spouse whose property has been added to increase the value of common joint property is entitled to compensation against joint assets. .
The legal regime of family assets shall not be applied to the assets acquired andused jointly by cohabitees as well as to the joint assets of persons living together without a partnership contract.
A spouse may not have more rights than the other spouse in respect of their children and joint assets; the same conditions concerning the dissolution of marriage are set forth in relation to wife and husband; the regulation of the status of a spouse may not be differentiated on the grounds of gender.
There was a tendency to penalize women more severely than men for infidelity, recognized as grounds for divorce, butthe spouse accused of infidelity could no longer be deprived of his or her share of joint assets acquired during marriage.
This and other similar problems give grounds for economic regulation of non-matrimonial unions,for what usually happens is that before liquidating their joint assets, the named holder of the deeds to the property sells it; in other cases he may expel his partner from the home and let it, or mortgage it and it is then repossessed.
Since, in the Dominican Republic, the application of justice is based on the law, legal doctrine and case law, this ruling sets a major precedent for the future; both judges and attorneys will be able to cite the decision of the Supreme Court of Justice in favour of this woman not only for the purposes of recognizing the rights of descendants of common-law partners butalso with regard to enjoyment of the tangible joint assets acquired in the relationship.