Примеры использования Most of the responding states на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Most of the responding States reported not having concluded such agreements with other parties.
As indicated above,the typical term of imprisonment imposed by most of the responding States ranges from a term of 6 months to 10 years.
Most of the responding States reported having in place domestic legislation on mutual legal assistance.
Most of the responding States reported being able to provide all types of assistance listed in paragraph 3.
With the exception of a number of responding States(Algeria, Germany, Italy, Malta, Mauritius, South Africa, Thailand, Togo andUnited Kingdom), most of the responding States confirmed that the consent of the victim was taken into account in the context of the repatriation process.
Most of the responding States had established specialized units for investigating drug trafficking cases 74.2 per cent.
Likewise, specific measures against the use by public officials of their official authority for the improper advancement of:(a) their own interests,(b) their family's personal interests; and(c) their financial interests were foreseen by the domestic laws oradministrative policies of most of the responding States.
Most of the responding States reported that they had adopted the necessary legislative measures to criminalize this activity.
With the exception of a number of responding States(Algeria, Germany, Italy, South Africa, Thailand and the United Kingdom of Great Britain andNorthern Ireland), most of the responding States confirmed that the consent of the victim was taken into account in the context of the repatriation process.
Most of the responding States required additional scrutiny with respect to items or commodities seen as significant in public security terms.
Most of the responding States(88 per cent) thought that the recommendations made by the subsidiary bodies were sufficiently taken into account by the CND.
For most of the responding States, legislation or other arrangements did not require withholding mutual legal assistance on grounds of bank secrecy.
Most of the responding States reported that their national legislation contained definitions of ammunition in line with the definition provided for by the Protocol.
Most of the responding States and territories reported having put in place policies for demand reduction 108 States and territories, or 75 per cent of respondents.
Most of the responding States reported that their national legislation contained definitions of firearms in line with the definition provided for by the Protocol.
Most of the responding States reported that they had adopted legislation to combat and prohibit bribery and other forms of corruption and bribery, although such measures were still pending in some countries.
Most of the responding States reported that they had legislation permitting mutual legal assistance 81 per cent overall: 77 in Africa, 100 in the Americas, 70 in Asia and 80 in Europe.
Whereas most of the responding States referred to the right of compensation for physical, mental and moral suffering, a distinction was in some cases reported as to the damages suffered.
In most of the responding States however, that role could still be considered subsidiary to the public security forces, which took up the main role in providing security.
Most of the responding States reported that their competent authorities had established cooperation with relevant international organizations in implementing measures to carry out the return of smuggled migrants see art. 18, para. 6, of the Migrants Protocol.
Most of the responding States reported that their competent authorities had cooperated with relevant international organizations in implementing measures to carry out the return of smuggled migrants see art. 18, para. 6, of the Migrants Protocol.
Most of the responding States reported the adoption of measures to that effect, including regular reviews of the production and issuance process and upgrading of technology and equipment used for ensuring the security and control of documents.
Most of the responding States reported that their national legislation established as a criminal offence the manufacturing or assembly of firearms, their parts and components or ammunition from parts and components that had been trafficked.
Most of the responding States(the exceptions being Afghanistan, Ecuador, Mauritius, Myanmar and Peru) confirmed that their competent authorities had been involved in international law enforcement cooperation to combat criminal activities committed through the use of modern technology.
Most of the responding States confirmed that they would be able to apply the provisions of article 18 of the Convention, including paragraphs 9-29, in order to provide mutual legal assistance to parties to the Convention with which they were not bound by a mutual legal assistance treaty.
Most of the responding States reported that appropriate consideration was given to treating the migrants with dignity and care and carrying out the return process in a safe and humane manner, even where specific rules for the return of smuggled migrants did not exist, as was the case with Finland and the Netherlands.
Most of the responding States reported that appropriate consideration was given to treating the migrants with dignity and care and carrying out the return process in a safe and humane manner, even where specific rules for the return of smuggled migrants did not exist, as was the case with Finland and the Netherlands.
Most of the responding States confirmed that measures were in place under their immigration laws enabling the denial of entry into the national territory or the revocation of visas of persons involved generally in the commission of criminal offences and not necessarily only in the offence of trafficking in persons see art. 11, para. 5, of the Protocol.
Most of the responding States(except Afghanistan, Burundi, Cameroon, Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ecuador, Indonesia, Mauritius, Myanmar, Peru and Trinidad and Tobago) confirmed that their competent authorities had been involved in international law enforcement cooperation to combat criminal activities committed through the use of modern technology.