Примеры использования Panel has concluded на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The panel has concluded that D4, D5, D6 and D7 are safe for use in cosmetics.
So far as the Receiving Entities that are“F3” claimants are concerned, the Panel has concluded that the claimants form part of the Government, and their losses are accordingly the Government's losses.
The Panel has concluded that only USD 20,000 of the claim is a claim for loss of tangible property.
In reviewing the information provided by KOTC with respect to the"estimated" and"actual" operating costs for the vessel, the Panel has concluded that the normal costs for depreciation and insurance, which were avoided while NAKILAT 1 was in the repair yard, were not fully taken into account.
The Panel has concluded that it is very probable that separate funding streams are required, both internal and external.
After careful consideration, the Panel has concluded that the whole of the US$514,919 should be recommended for compensation.2.
The Panel has concluded that none of the projects under consideration was abandoned as a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
In reviewing those prior-year results, the Panel has concluded that KOTC significantly overstated its revenue, and consequent adjustments of this magnitude are therefore also in order.
The Panel has concluded that the remaining items had a value in the amount of USD 9,305,727 on 15 January 1991, the date on which the last of China State's employees left Iraq.
Consequently, the Panel has concluded that the claim for loss of use in this regard is speculative and not compensable by this Commission.
The Panel has concluded that there has been progress related to requirements for data maintenance and sharing, especially with regard to reporting of export statistics.
As a result of its investigations, the Panel has concluded that property returned in serviceable condition was in some cases repaired and put back into service, and claims for the repairs were in some cases made.
The Panel has concluded, therefore, that the fuel oil that was in the tanks when they were destroyed may not have been the fuel oil that was in the tanks immediately before Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
From its review of the first service order, the Panel has concluded that Coneco was retained as a subcontractor to Foxboro in connection with Foxboro's construction of a compressor for Petrochemical Industries Company, a Kuwaiti, State-owned chemical manufacturer.
The Panel has concluded that there was some limited betterment to KNPC's facilities of this sort, and recommendations for appropriate adjustments have been made in such cases, as described in paragraphs 113, 117 and 118 below.
The Panel has concluded that claimants may not invoke such contractual agreements or clauses before the Commission to avoid the“arising prior to” exclusion established by the Security Council in resolution 687(1991); consequently, this argument must fail. See para. 101.
The Panel has concluded that Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait led to the interruptions in Government services alleged, but that, by reason of the diversity of economic factors bearing upon each case, the determination of any revenue losses suffered has to be made separately for each claim. clii.
The Panel has concluded that even if Iraq's invasion, occupation and purported annexation of Kuwait and subsequent actions were to have constituted a repudiation of the loan and deposit agreements, any repudiation has itself been declared null and void by the Security Council and was rescinded by decree No. 55 of the Revolutionary Command Council, issued on 5 March 1991.
On closer inspection, the Panel has concluded that this analysis is not a calculation of ABB's loss of profits, but is instead ABB's statement of the additional revenues that it stood to receive under the agreement had it continued for the entire 154-week period. ABB did not present evidence of the actual costs that it incurred in its performance under the agreement up to the date of termination.
He stated that the panel had concluded that there was no merit to allegations that field visits had not occurred.
They noted that the panel had concluded that, on the whole, UNDP had operated in accordance with applicable rules and procedures.
This and other panels have concluded that the direct effects of the invasion and occupation would have abated after a few months.
Regarding the process described by Brazil, the Panel had concluded that the use of carbon tetrachloride constituted a process agent, but indicated that Brazilhad phased out that use in 2000.
With regard to Turkey's use of bromochloromethane for the production of an antibiotic, the Panel had concluded that, while some of the chemical was consumed as a feedstock, its primary use was as a process agent and it was therefore recommended as such.
The delegation pointed out that,although the panel had found no evidence of retaliation against the person who had originally reported the allegations, the panel had concluded that he had been justified in raising issues about practices in the office.
Noting that the Scientific Assessment Panel had concluded that HFCs could erase all climate gains made to date, the representative of an international environmental non-governmental organization urged the parties to take action on HFCs.
In terms of the relevance of the existing categories and criteria for laboratory andanalytical essential uses, the Panel had concluded that those adopted by the Sixth Meeting of the Parties could also cover related methyl bromide uses, while the critical-use exemption process could continue to apply to larger quantities of methyl bromide.
Far from calling into question the Commission's statute, the Panel had concluded that the provisions of articles 3 and 4 of the statute relating to the selection of members, a responsibility shared by Member States and by the Secretary-General in his capacity as Chairman of the United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination(CEB), should be applied more rigourously.
He also noted that,in its 2005 report, the Panel had concluded that those technologies had still not demonstrated the capability that would warrant their inclusion on the list, but suggested that one group of technologies, relating to the destruction of fluorinated gases, could be reviewed again in the near future.
The Panel was repeatedly reminded by the Government of Liberia that the sanctions imposed under paragraphs 5 to 7 of resolution 1343(2001)were a direct result of the report of the Panel of Experts on Sierra Leone(S/2000/1195), in which the Panel had concluded that the Government of Liberia was actively aiding and abetting conflict in Sierra Leone by providing military and financial support to RUF.