Примеры использования Proposal needed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The proposal needed further clarification.
The expert from Germany summarized that the proposal needed further changes.
The proposal needed the approval of 25 members of the European Union and was to be presented to the Islamic Republic of Iran in the days ahead.
For the time being, the Committee should simply say that the proposal needed further examination.
One representative recalled that such a proposal needed to be submitted at least six months before the meeting at which it was to be considered.
While recognizing the potential carriage problems,the Joint Meeting felt that the proposal needed further work.
However, important elements,such as the budget proposal, needed for the Executive Body should be formally adopted at the Steering Body session.
The proposal needed to be written in the form of guidelines for AGR Contracting Parties with little experience of conducting road audits and inspections.
In explanation of its vote, Germany stated that the proposal needed to specify the cooling-down times.
That proposal needed to be implemented immediately so that the countries in question could begin making use of the resources thereby released in order to accelerate the implementation of the Goals.
On the other hand, some delegations reiterated their view that international organizations had in practice the same rights andobligations as other States Parties and that the proposal needed further consideration.
In response, another delegation stated that the proposal needed further study and that it could be presented as a joint recommendation by a group of African States.
Mr. Smith(United States of America)said that he wished to defer a decision on the proposal until all the recommendations in the non-unitary section had been discussed, since the proposal needed to be considered in the light of the entire chapter.
The Chairman noted that,besides the technical content, the proposal needed also formal reconsideration, because it looked like an addition to the existing para. 6.5.8. of Regulation No. 48, not like its replacement.
In view of the opinion received from the UN Office of Legal Affairs with regard to the possible repercussions of the amended Rules of Procedure to be adopted,the TIRExB decided that the proposal needed further discussion and, therefore, decided to revert to the issue at its forthcoming session.
The proposal needed to be studied further: there was not sufficient information as to the methodology for calculating expenditure and there was a lack of clarity regarding the use of the remaining 2 million euros from the resources available.
Responding to a question from a member of the Committee,the representative of the Multilateral Fund Secretariat confirmed that a number of issues in the project proposal needed to be clarified, including how the implementation of the plan of action would be monitored and whether it was a multi-year proposal, and the sum requested, which fell above the limits agreed by the Executive Committee for this type of project.
The Committee expressed its opinion that the proposal needed to be reworked and that thought should be given to finding means to provide services to staff without automatically creating new posts, taking fully into account existing requests in the proposed programme budget for 2006-2007 A/60/7/Add.1, para. 5.
The Open-ended Working Group agreed that the proposal needed further work and agreed to forward the draft decision, as set out in the annex to the present report, in square brackets for consideration by the Seventeenth Meeting of the Parties.
With respect to document TRANS/WP.29/GRRF/R.299,the expert from FEMFM explained that the proposal needed to be completed for the case where Type-III replacement brake linings were to be tested against the original Type-II brake linings. Whilst it was agreed that the matter was urgent, and Type-III replacement brake linings approval should be allowed as soon as possible, WP.29/GRRF agreed that the text of the proposal needed further examination.
Proposals need to clearly address topics of the workshop as described in section III.
These proposals need the support of the appropriate United Nations organs and of Member States.
These and other proposals need further consideration by donors and by recipient Governments.
In the opinion of the Committee, this proposal needs to be reworked and should be considered further in the light of the work of the redesign panel.
The proposal needs to be further developed, and is currently being considered in the LAS secretariat.
However, the Committee is of the view that the proposal needs to be developed further before the approval of the General Assembly is sought.
They take the view, however, that the proposal needs further study and refinement and they need more time for the acceptance of the concept.
Constituency representation based on the Kyoto Protocol Parties comment: this proposal needs to be further elaborated.
Note 1: The RF proposes to keep the old text of article 8.5(see the text in the left column) but this proposal needs further discussion.
The informal group finished its work,the test cycle is under testing and the proposal needs editorial work.