Примеры использования Recalled that his delegation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Mr. LALLIOT(France) recalled that his delegation had reserved its position on article 4 and the subsequent articles.
Mr. Elji(Syrian Arab Republic), referring to paragraph 25 of General Assembly resolution 58/270, recalled that his delegation had been actively involved in the drafting thereof.
Mr. Sočanac(Croatia) recalled that his delegation associated itself with the statement made on behalf of the European Union.
Mr. Pulido León(Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela)supported the request made by the representative of Uruguay and recalled that his delegation had already called on the Secretariat to carry out a study on flight hours and fuel costs.
Mr. THEUERMANN(Austria) recalled that his delegation had been among the sponsors when the draft resolution had been introduced.
Mr. MICHALSKI(United States of America) recalled that his delegation had proposed that the honoraria should be reduced to $1 per year.
He recalled that his delegation had met all its financial obligations to the Organization, in spite of being a developing country, and would continue to do so.
At the 180th meeting, the representative of the United States recalled that his delegation had promised to consult with the Committee before establishing any new regulations concerning parking.
He recalled that his delegation had been among those which had suggested the insertion of"ecosystems" in article 5, and it would not accept the deletion of the term from part IV either.
Mr. Alouan Kanafani(Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela) recalled that his delegation had already expressed its opinion on the political aspects contained in the report of the Secretary-General A/62/521.
He recalled that his delegation had stated in the previous session its intention to close the application, but agreed to wait for the current session in order to allow the organization to respond.
Mr. BIGGAR(Ireland), speaking in explanation of vote before the vote, recalled that his delegation, which had sponsored both the original and the revised draft resolution had voted against the Singapore delegation's amendment.
Mr. HABIYAREMYE(Rwanda) recalled that his delegation reserved his position concerning the use of the word"custom" in paragraph 1 of the article, considering that it was likely to obstruct the implementation of the convention.
The representative of the United States of America recalled that his delegation had dissociated itself from the Committee's decision of 23 June 2000 to recommend the suspension of TRP and did not feel bound by it.
The observer for Egypt recalled that his delegation had followed the process of drafting the Norms and had been active in the adoption of Commission decision 2004/116.
Mr. Kanu(Sierra Leone) recalled that his delegation had expressed concern about the amendments of the Tribunal's Statute originally proposed by the United Kingdom.
Mr. Ó CEALLAIGH(Ireland) recalled that his delegation had submitted a proposal in June 2004 concerning mines other than anti-personnel mines laid outside perimeter-marked areas CCW/GGE/VIII/WG.2/WP.2.
Mr. SVIRIDOV(Russian Federation) recalled that his delegation had put forward a proposal on the issue, contained in document A/C.6/51/NUW/WG/CRP.34, which sought to give priority to drinking water in paragraph 2.
Mr. Rehbein(Germany) recalled that his delegation had opposed the wording of original recommendations 189 and 192 because of the difficulty of making a clear distinction between inventory and other tangible property.
Mr. Repasch(United States of America) recalled that his delegation had expressed dismay about the findings of the OIOS audit of the Investment Management Service, which had revealed substantial irregularities and poor management.
Mr. DAMICO(Brazil) recalled that his delegation had voted in favour of Security Council resolution 827(1993) recognizing that the exceptionally grave situation in the former Yugoslavia might demand exceptional action.
Mr. Buffa(Paraguay) recalled that his delegation had written a letter to the Secretary-General, contained in document A/57/378, pointing out that the Republic of China on Taiwan had made great progress in all areas.
Mr. RIVERO ROSARIO(Cuba) recalled that his delegation had been in favour of merging the draft resolutions introduced by Afghanistan(A/C.1/48/L.31) and Colombia(A/C.1/48/L.27), and had proposed several amendments to Afghanistan's proposal.
Mr. Li Wenzhu(China) recalled that his delegation had suggested the deletion of article 17 bis, paragraph 1(b), on the grounds that, since interim measures were generally of a very urgent nature, it made no sense to delay the procedure.
Mr. JADMANI(Pakistan) recalled that his delegation had voted in favour of Security Council resolution 827(1993), which had created the Tribunal and adopted its Statute, and said that his country attached great importance to the functioning of the Tribunal.
Mr. Sabbagh(Syrian Arab Republic) recalled that his delegation had, in the past, warned that Israel's efforts to change the demographic and geographical composition of those territories, particularly in Jerusalem, would close the door on any prospects for peace.
Mr. AL-RASSI(Saudi Arabia) recalled that his delegation had from the beginning opposed the consideration of agenda item 100(e) because it believed that it was premature, as experience had clearly shown five years previously, and that it would be a waste of time.
Mr. Cardoso(Brazil) recalled that his delegation had expressed doubts to the Commission on Human Rights and the General Assembly about resolutions on country-specific human rights situations, because they failed to benefit the people they were intended to protect.
Mr. AYEWAH(Nigeria) recalled that his delegation had agreed that the Commission should draft the statute of an international criminal tribunal but that it would prefer the Commission to complete first of all the elaboration of the draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind.
Mr. Marrapodi(Italy) recalled that his delegation had previously suggested that, instead of making slow progress on a large number of topics, the Commission should concentrate on one or two subjects in its work each year, so as to allow for in-depth discussion within the Commission and more focused deliberations in the Sixth Committee.