Примеры использования Regular process should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The regular process should encourage science that is policy relevant but not policy prescriptive.
The view was expressed that financial contributions to the Regular Process should be made through the trust fund established for that purpose.
The Regular Process should build on management-based integrated assessments.
Instead of establishing new funding mechanismsfor scientific research and capacity-building, it suggested that the Regular Process should aim at facilitating an optimal utilization of existing instruments, such as GEF, and of the existing funding of multilateral organizations see para. 12.
The Regular Process should be made global and focus not only on GEF-eligible regions.
The Ad Hoc Working Group of the Whole decides that the Group of Experts,in consultation with the Bureau and the secretariat of the Regular Process, should consider ways to improve coordination with other agencies and bodies conducting assessments that involve the oceans, including through the sharing of information and data on assessments.
The regular process should be based on priorities established by the Ad Hoc Working Group of the Whole, taking into account Governments' needs and requests.
It stressed that,operating within the United Nations framework, the Regular Process should strictly adhere to United Nations principles, regulations and procedures when undertaking assessment work.
The regular process should add value to the existing and future spectrum of assessments and develop a functional science-policy interface to support the sustainable development of oceans and their resources.
China stressed that the primary guidance anddecision-making role in the management and review body for the Regular Process should be undertaken by participating Member States, with representatives of intergovernmental organizations and persons with relevant expertise providing advice and participating in the discussions.
The Regular Process should also be representative and inclusive in terms of regional representation, well-defined and based on sound and integrated scientific analysis as well as mutually agreed terms of conduct, and committed to education and outreach.
In order to avoid duplication, the regular process should encourage synergies with existing processes at the regional and global levels.
Thus, the regular process should be regarded as an ongoing process that would provide an initial base-line and reference against which to note change and thus to adjust decision and management cycles accordingly.
The agenda of a workshop to support the Regular Process should, as far as possible, include the elements set out in appendix II to these guidelines.
Such a Regular Process should be based on the development of a suite of coordinated products from subregional to pan-European levels, with a synchronicity and timing suitable to maximizing their use in multiple policy processes. .
The assessment of assessments was clear that the Regular Process should aim for"fully integrated assessments"-- a phrase that includes all three contexts of integration.
As a first step, the regular process should identify priorities for filling the information gaps identified in the assessment of assessments report and create and improve arrangements for assembling both economic and social information and physical, chemical and biological data from sources at the regional and national levels, and for managing that information.
Brazil agreed with the report on the results of the"assessment of assessments" that the secretariat of the Regular Process should be hosted within the United Nations structure in a body or bodies with experience in managing a scientific process, appropriate links to relevant expert communities and stakeholders and the competence to enter into agreements with potential partners and collaborating institutions.
It expressed the view that the Regular Process should not undertake direct capacity-building initiatives but rather be responsible for the facilitation and identification of capacity-building projects through existing processes and instruments.
As a first step, to serve as a planning tool andto create a focus for existing efforts, the regular process should draw together the capacity-building needs identified as priorities in the assessment of assessments report; where these needs cannot be met by existing capacity-building arrangements, the process can facilitate and promote a wide range of partnerships to satisfy them;
China expressed the view that the Regular Process should proceed from a scientific point of view in assessing global and supraregional issues of the marine environment that were of common concern to all countries and should not interfere in the specific maritime affairs of States.
China suggested that the Regular Process should make full use of existing mechanisms in order to avoid duplication of labour and waste of resources.
However, some of those delegations were of the view that the Regular Process should not undertake direct capacity-building, but should facilitate and identify capacity-building needs and projects and aim at facilitating an optimal utilization of existing processes and instruments.
At its meetings, the Working Group of the Whole agreed that the Regular Process should aim at strengthening the science-policy interface for the sustainable use, management and conservation of the oceans and seas and their resources and biodiversity, as well as long-term human well-being and sustainable development.
In particular, I would like to highlight that the follow-up to the regular process should be carried out by an intergovernmental forum, that equitable geographic distribution in the constitution of the panel of experts should be respected and that capacity-building should be ensured for the effective participation of developing countries.
Canada suggested that the Regular Process should be synergistic with ongoing processes, such as the proposed intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services, and be fully integrated with existing marine assessment work, including work that is sectoral(e.g., fisheries, tourism) or thematic e.g., coral reefs, marine debris.
The regular assessment process should provide the basis for responsible decision-making to improve the situation.
Legitimacy in particular should result from a Regular Process that was inclusive.
Inspection: the various aspects of the process should go through regular inspections in order to detect unacceptable variations.
Contributors will have expertise that applies to a particular aspect of the Regular Process, but they should, nevertheless, familiarize themselves with the broad context of the Regular Process.