Примеры использования Some representatives considered на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some representatives considered that the question should be reviewed periodically.
While concerned about the risks inherent in Internet facilities, some representatives considered that many predictions concerning the use of new technologies were still speculative.
Some representatives considered that, generally speaking, the proposed reformulation improved the text.
Another noted that synergies between environmental conventions were usually encouraged, and some representatives considered that the Montreal Protocol needed to work more closely with the institutions dealing with climate change.
Some representatives considered that the state of the equipment depended on how it had been maintained.
While recognizing that a list of the type proposed would help dispel the ambiguities of primary rules andfacilitate the determination of the consequences of international crimes, some representatives considered it practically impossible to arrive at a list that would be universally acceptable.
Some representatives considered that a framework to improve regional cooperation was needed.
With regard to paragraph 5, some representatives considered it important not to allow any dissenting or separate opinions in the decision lest the authority of the Court be eroded.
Some representatives considered that the reference related to the competent authority of the country of origin.
Concerning the topic of unilateral acts, some representatives considered it particularly appropriate for codification and progressive development, in view of the legal uncertainty prevailing over that subject, and that a well-defined study describing the current state of the law would therefore be of great value.
Some representatives considered the topic to be well defined and to merit inclusion in the future programme of work.
Some representatives considered the amount proposed in the report for funding such activities to be insufficient.
Some representatives considered working paper A/AC.182/L.79 a good basis for finding a solution to the problem.
Some representatives considered that such a guide was of great assistance to States and international organizations.
Some representatives considered that the cost of Profi should be included in the support budget.
Some representatives considered the idea of developing new international legal instruments on economic and financial crime.
Some representatives considered that UNDCP should further increase its efforts to involve all concerned agencies, particularly at the field level.
Some representatives considered the approach taken to the issue of compensation or other relief in chapter III of the draft to be in the right direction.
Some representatives considered that a gulf was being created between the two Committees, whereas their roles were complementary and they should work in harmony.
Some representatives considered that the feasibility of a large-scale programme should be carefully studied, given the political and technical uncertainties.
Some representatives considered that the report should have contained more information on the status of projects and outlined policy options for the consideration of the Commission.
Some representatives considered the proposal to be extremely important, since it concerned the medium- and low-volume-consuming countries and their ability to meet their obligations.
Some representatives considered it inappropriate for notifications and proposals from Participating States to result in legally binding obligations on Parties.
Some representatives considered that the international community should seize the opportunity of the ban on opium poppy cultivation since July 2000, and provide incentives to Afghan farmers to grow traditional crops.
Some representatives considered that UNDCP should further strengthen its ties with non-governmental organizations, with a view to increasing their financial contributions to the Fund of UNDCP in support of prevention programmes.
Some representatives considered that, without the threat of arrest or forced eradication, alternative development would not succeed; others referred to the need to establish trust and cooperation first.
Some representatives considered it useful to specify that the future instrument would not affect existing international watercourse agreements unless the States parties to such agreements decided otherwise.
Some representatives considered that the idea of setting 2008 as a target date had many attractions, but there were several technical issues that required detailed examination before they could endorse the proposal.
Some representatives considered that 7.5.1 had been designed for tanks, others that Chapter 7.5 only applied to vehicles and containers, and still others that neither containers nor tank-containers were intended in 7.5.1.
Some representatives considered that the distribution procedure described by the Executive Secretary had not happened promptly enough for the issue to be discussed at the Sixteenth Meeting of the Parties, the high-level segment of which would start on 25 November 2004, while other delegations reserved their position.