Примеры использования Special rapporteur thought на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Special Rapporteur thought that they could be modelled on the procedure for the formulation of reservations, to the extent that it could apply to withdrawal.
She asked what the most significant developments on the issue were and how the Special Rapporteur thought the phenomenon might be combated most effectively.
They would like to know how the Special Rapporteur thought transparency could be increased with regard to evaluating the civilian impact of drone strikes.
With regard to equipmentspecifically designed to inflict torture, he would like to know what kind of international control mechanism the Special Rapporteur thought could be set up to deal with the trade in such equipment.
The Special Rapporteur thought that all those observations could apply also to draft guideline 2.6.4, including with regard to the use of the term"freedom" in its title.
For five years, his predecessor, Rajsoomer Lallah, had not been allowed to visit the country, and the Special Rapporteur thought that this would be a way to engage with the Government in a new form of dialogue on human rights.
The Special Rapporteur thought that the other draft guidelines contained in the tenth report should be considered again at the fiftyeighth session, given that the Commission had not been able to discuss them in depth for lack of time.
The report had also highlighted the need for effective monitoring of humanitarian assistance to ensure that access to such assistance was equitable, andhe wondered how the Special Rapporteur thought that goal might be best achieved.
While the opposite argument may be advanced, the Special Rapporteur thought that it would be useful to know what the positions of the contracting States and international organizations were even if those positions were devoid of any legal effect.
As to the question raised concerning the situation in which a State applies in practice the provision with regard to which it has formulated a reservation, the Special Rapporteur thought that the problem transcended the sphere of reservations to treaties and came closer to the topic of"Fragmentation of international law" or of unilateral acts.
For that reason, the Special Rapporteur thought that a phrase along the following lines should be added at the end of draft guideline 2.6.8:"in accordance with draft guideline 2.6.13", since the latter concerned the time period for formulating an objection.
He proceeded in a rather unusual manner by proposing a draft article de lege lata, but matching it with four alternative proposals de lege ferenda,which gave the impression that the distinguished Special Rapporteur thought that the existing laws were not satisfactory and that he hoped to have them modified by persuading the Commission to engage in the progressive development of international law.
On the other hand, the Special Rapporteur thought that attention should be devoted to another question that the Vienna Conventions had left unanswered, namely whether an acceptance required by the competent organ of the organization must be express or could be tacit.
No text is being submitted on this point, as the Special Rapporteur thought it might be more useful for the Commission to discuss this aspect of the topic and give him appropriate guidance so that he can present specific wording in his sixth report.
The Special Rapporteur thought it preferable that the Commission suggest a flexible mechanism of assistance in relation to reservations, one that could provide both technical advice and assistance in resolving differences concerning reservations.
Ms. Borzi Cornacchia(Italy), speaking on behalf of the European Union,asked if the Special Rapporteur thought that the abolition of the Military Court would change the situation she had described in her report, in which most crimes were dealt with by military courts, and if she believed that the Government had the political will to change that situation.
The Special Rapporteur thought, however, that there seemed to be an undeniable trend in international practice towards introducing into specific activities civil liability for transboundary harm and that he should, therefore, present that possibility to the Commission. In the international practice considered, such civil liability could coexist with State liability only in so far as the latter was residual, in other words when neither the operator nor his insurance could cover the full amount of the compensation fixed.
Given the silence of the Vienna Conventions on the matter, the Special Rapporteur thought it would be contrary to the purpose and the object of article 20, paragraph 5, of the Conventions to state that, once an acceptance had been secured, the accepting State or international organization could reverse its acceptance, which would be counter to the general principle of good faith and might pose serious problems of legal security in terms of the reserving State's participation.
She asked what the Special Rapporteur thought the major dimensions of global citizenship education should be and how Member States might be further encouraged to incorporate that newly developed concept into their responsibilities to provide quality education for all.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that this draft article should be deleted.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that these criticisms are groundless.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that a reference to draft article 10(also advocated by Switzerland) is neither necessary nor useful.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that the report reflects accurately the Government's commitment to eradicate forced labour and the problems involved in carrying this out.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that the Government must seriously consider and implement a proposal for the establishment of an independent ombudsman and the opening of an ILO representative office in Yangon.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that human development and economic modernization must take place to defeat the poverty that is at the root of Myanmar's many problems.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that freedom of press in Myanmar might be a way of developing confidence on all sides.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that the International Crisis Group in its Asia Briefing(27 September 2002) has phrased this requirement, with which he entirely agrees, very successfully.
In light of these remarks, the Special Rapporteur thinks that it would be useful to include in the Guide to Practice a guideline highlighting the lack of conditions for the substantive validity of an interpretative declaration unless, of course, the treaty provides otherwise.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that, pending those future developments, it is highly desirable that steps be taken to reform the penal code and make the death penalty optional and not mandatory for offences currently punishable only by death.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that this measure is of significant importance because, in the absence of substantive political settlements and economic growth, the ceasefires have not in themselves been able to change the situation on the ground for most of the victims of previous conflicts.