Примеры использования Stated in its reservation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
China stated in its reservation that it was not bound by article 35, paragraph 2.
The Lao People's Democratic Republic stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 35, paragraph 2.
Colombia stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 35, paragraph 2.
Micronesia(Federated States of) stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 35, paragraph 2.
Myanmar stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by obligations to refer disputes relating to the interpretation or application of the Convention to the International Court of Justice.
For example, as Bolivia had stated in its reservation to the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, chewing coca leafin its natural form was not harmful and should not be prohibited.
Myanmar stated in its reservation on article 20 that it did not consider itself bound by obligations to refer disputes relating to the interpretation or application of the Protocol to the International Court of Justice.
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 35, paragraph 2, which stipulated that all disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention shall be referred to the International Court of Justice.
Lithuania stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 35, paragraph 2, stipulating that any disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention shall be referred to the International Court of Justice.
Azerbaijan stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 35, paragraph 2.
El Salvador stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 35, paragraph 2, because it did not recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.
Myanmar stated in its reservation on article 15 that it did not consider itself bound by obligations to refer disputes relating to the interpretation or application of the Trafficking in Persons Protocol to the International Court of Justice.
Lithuania stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 16, paragraph 2, providing the settlement of disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the Firearms Protocol at the International Court of Justice.
Lithuania stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 20, paragraph 2, which provided that any State party might refer any dispute concerning the interpretation or application of the Migrants Protocol to the International Court of Justice.
Tunisia stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by article 20, paragraph 2 and affirmed that disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Migrants Protocol might be referred to the International Court of Justice only after it had given its prior consent.
Algeria stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 35, paragraph 2, which provided that any dispute between two or more States concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention that had not been settled by negotiation shall be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice at the request of any of the parties thereto.
South Africa stated in its reservation that, pending a decision by the Government of the Republic of South Africa on the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, it did not consider itself bound by the terms of article 35, paragraph 2, which provided for the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in differences arising out of the interpretation or application of the Convention.
Algeria stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 20, paragraph 2, which provided that any dispute between two or more States concerning the interpretation or application of the Migrants Protocol that could not be settled through negotiation shall, at the request of one of those States, be submitted to arbitration or referred to the International Court of Justice.
Algeria stated in its reservation that it did not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 2, which provided that any dispute between two or more States parties concerning the interpretation or application of the Firearms Protocol that could not be settled through negotiation shall, at the request of one of those States, be submitted to arbitration or referred to the International Court of Justice.
Although that did not rule out the possibility of entering a reservation thereto,the Committee stated in its general comment on article 24 that, in the case of peremptory norms of international law, while there was no automatic correlation between reservations to nonderogable provisions and reservations which offended against the object and purpose of the Covenant, the State concerned had a heavy onus to justifiy such a reservation.
Finland states in its reservation that although young prisoners in Finland are regularly separated from adult prisoners, it is not appropriate to adopt an absolute prohibition to permit more flexible procedures.
The Committee recommends that the State party review its reservation to article 7(d) of the Covenant, with a view to withdrawing it, in particular as the State party included a temporary element in its reservation to article 7d.
With regard to the State party's reservation to article 21 of the Convention,the Committee notes that concerns expressed by the State party in its reservation are well taken care of by article 21 which expressly refers to States parties which"recognize and/or permit the system of adoption.
The Committee further reiterates its view that the concerns expressed by the State party in its reservation are well addressed by article 37(c), which provides that every child deprived of liberty shall be separated from adults"unless it is considered in the best interests of the child not to do so" and that the child"shall have the right to maintain contact with his or her family.
Venezuela states its reservation in respect of the whole of paragraph 129 on the initiative by the Secretary-General on Sustainable Energy for All, with which our country does not agree.
It would therefore be logical to conclude that since the reserving State operated within a specific treaty regime in its relations with other States parties thereto, in making its reservation it was dealing with the relevant provision of the instrument as a treaty rule.
The existing treaty relationship between the reserving State and other States parties would not be affected in any manner whatsoever and the reserving State should not be able to invoke the reservation in its treaty relationship with other States parties.