Примеры использования States that have abolished на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Member States that have abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
The death penalty shall not be reestablished in states that have abolished it.
States that have abolished the death penalty should not reintroduce it.
Thus, Uzbekistan joined those States that have abolished the death penalty.
Ten states that have abolished the death penalty… have a murder rate lower than the national average.
Article 4, subsection 3 of the Convention forbids States that have abolished the death penalty to restore it.
Two States that have abolished the death penalty for ordinary crimes, Israel and Kazakhstan, appear to be in a similar position.
Welcoming the abolition of the death penalty which has taken place in some States since the last session of the Commission, andin particular in those States that have abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
States that have abolished the death penalty but have not yet ratified the relevant international instruments should proceed with such ratification.
In fact, if we are to look at the practice of States as indicative of standards,then there are more States where capital punishment is provided for than States that have abolished this penalty.
The General Assembly also calls upon States that have abolished the death penalty not to reintroduce it, and encourages them to share their experience in that regard.
One aspect includes recognition of the principle of non-refoulement,especially if there is a risk of torture in the absence of minimum guarantees in criminal proceedings or, for States that have abolished the death penalty, in the absence of adequate guarantees.
Furthermore, it may be noted that States that have abolished the death penalty or are moving towards abolition represent different legal systems, traditions, cultures and religious backgrounds.
States that have abolished the death penalty are absolutely prohibited from transferring a person when they know or ought to know that there is a real risk of the imposition of the death penalty A/HRC/18/20, para. 45.
The Human Rights Committee has taken the position that, under article 6 of the Covenant, States that have abolished the death penalty may not expel a person to another State in which he or she has been sentenced to death, unless they have previously obtained an assurance that the penalty will not be carried out.
Nine States that have abolished the death penalty are parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, but have not ratified or acceded to any of the abolitionist protocols, namely, Angola, Burundi, Cambodia, Côte d'Ivoire, Kyrgyzstan, Mauritius, Samoa, Senegal and Togo.
For transferring States that have abolished the death penalty, assurances must be obtained that remove completely the possibility that the person would face the death penalty in the receiving State. .
Moreover, States that have abolished the death penalty should deny extradition to States where the death penalty might be imposed, unless assurances are given that the individual concerned could not be sentenced to death or, if sentenced to death, the penalty would not be carried out.
Extradition procedures between States that had abolished the death penalty and States that still imposed it had shown what difficulties could arise in such circumstances.
A State that had abolished the death penalty was not bound by customary law to prohibit the transfer of a person to another State where the death penalty might be imposed.
As laid down in article 15 of the Constitution, Spain is a State that has abolished the death penalty,"except as provided for by military criminal law for time of war.
It has been suggested that extraditing a person to face the possible imposition of the death sentence is tantamount, for a State that has abolished capital punishment, to reintroducing it.
In addition, the Assembly called upon States that had abolished the death penalty not to reintroduce it and requested the Secretary-General to submit a report on the use of capital punishment based upon information to be provided by all States. .
A State that has abolished the death penalty may not expel a person who has been sentenced to death to a State in which that person may be executed without having previously obtained a guarantee that the death penalty will not be carried out.
A State that has abolished the death penalty may not expel an alien who is under a death sentence to a State in which that person may be executed without having previously obtained an assurance that the death penalty will not be carried out.
The Committee took the view that a State that had abolished the death penalty was bound by article 6(1), which proclaims"the inherent right to life" and affirms that no person"shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.
One example was paragraph 2 of draft article 23, which contained an obligation to the effect that a State that had abolished the death penalty was automatically bound not to expel a person to another State where the death penalty might be imposed.
Legislation has been proposed in Peru with a view to reviving the death penalty for crimes involving children and terrorism-related offences, and for Peru to denounce the American Convention on Human Rights,which prevents a State that has abolished the death penalty from bringing it back into force.
First, the prohibition established in paragraph 2 covered not only States that had abolished the death penalty, but also States that retained the penalty in their legislation but did not apply it in practice: that was the meaning of the phrase"a State that did not apply the death penalty.
According to some delegations,the draft article that would prohibit a State that has abolished the death penalty or that does not apply it from expelling an alien to a State in which he or she would be threatened by such penalty was too broad and did not correspond to customary international law.