Примеры использования Such liability на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Such liability may be administrative or criminal.
It is understood that such liability is also limited.
Such liability should be imposed exclusively by a court of law.
Employers are required to insure themselves in respect of such liability.
Such liability may be criminal, civil or administrative.
At present, no provision exists to meet such liability.
Such liability may be criminal, civil or administrative.
Several delegations stated that such liability ran counter to their domestic law.
Such liability is incurred only in the event of gross negligence or a denial of justice.
Damage to the environment should be considered for inclusion in such liability.
If so, should such liability be criminal, civil or administrative?
In particular, the option of setting a cap on liability would allow cargo insurers to cover such liability which would benefit the carrier as well.
Whether such liability arises in contract, tort including negligence.
The 1963 Vienna Convention also provides for such liability where damage is not reasonably separable.
Such liability would be without proof of fault and might be subject to limitations, exceptions and conditions.
Hence the problem of providing satisfactory insurance cover for such liability has not yet become acute in a great number of developing countries.
Such liability does not prejudice the criminal liability of natural persons who commit the same offence.
However, anything less than full and unqualified acceptance by the Government of Japanof legal liability and the consequences that flow from such liability is wholly inadequate.
In some cases, such liability extends to liability for environmental damage.
The comprehensive measures taken in relation to the establishment of liability of legal persons, andfrequent consideration of such liability by the Judicial Complex for Economic Affairs.
Such liability is incurred without prejudice to the criminal liability of individuals having committed the offences.
With respect to the liability incurred by the controlling party, the view was expressed that further discussion would be needed regarding clauses limiting or extending such liability.
Such liability shall be limited to that portion of liability not satisfied by the Operator or otherwise.
Relevant legislation establishing such liability in different areas includes the IPC, as amended, the Cyber Crimes Act, the Civil Liability Code and the Commercial Code.
Such liability does not prejudice the criminal liability of natural persons who commit the same offence.
But even ifit were so, such liability could not be considered effective, in particular because it is linked to the liability of a natural person and due to the disproportionate sanction.
Such liability is triggered by a damage caused by a failure of the sponsored contractor to comply with its obligations.
According to this view, such liability should not be directly attributed to a State merely because the activity causing transboundary harm had been undertaken in areas under its jurisdiction.
Such liability is incurred without prejudice to the criminal liability of individuals having committed the offences or of their accomplices.
Such liability shall be incurred without prejudice to the criminal[or civil]liability of the natural persons who have committed the offences or of their accomplices.