Примеры использования Supreme court rejected на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Supreme Court rejected the appeal.
In a decision issued on 6 March 2002, the Supreme Court rejected the appeal.
The Supreme Court rejected this complaint.
Szalay, the attorney for the widow Solymosi, in a speech full of bitter invectives,appealed against the decision; but the supreme court rejected his appeal and confirmed the verdict of the county court. .
The Supreme Court rejected the application.
Люди также переводят
On 23 September 2003,her son submitted to the Supreme Court an application for the review of his conviction. The Supreme Court rejected the application on 4 November 2003, finding no grounds for reconsideration of the case.
The Supreme Court rejected the authors' appeal.
In the third place, it was argued that there had been a violation of CISG article 27 read in conjunction with article 39(2)in that the judgement of the Provincial High Court had not taken into account certain documents; the Supreme Court rejected this argument also on the grounds that it constituted an indirect attempt to obtain a re-evaluation of the evidence, something that was not permissible in the case of a judicial review by the Supreme Court. .
The Supreme Court rejected the application.
On 7 August 2000, the Bishkek Military Court acquitted the author. On 11 September 2000, the Military Court of Kyrgyzstan annulled this judgment and sent the case back for re-examination. On 16 September 2000, the author's lawyer appealed under the supervisory procedure with the Supreme Court against the decision of the Military Court of Kyrgyzstan.On 20 September 2000, a three-judge panel of the Supreme Court rejected the request for review.
In June 2009, the Supreme Court rejected an appeal.
The Supreme Court rejected his final appeal in May 2012 and confirmed his extradition to Sweden.
On 17 November 2000, the Supreme Court rejected the author's appeal.
The Supreme Court rejected this application on 14 December 2007.
On July 29, the Supreme Court rejected his petition.
The Supreme Court rejected their claim for the land.
On 8 March 2006, the Supreme Court rejected the author's application.
The Supreme Court rejected his further appeal on 14 April 1992.
On 28 April 2003, the Supreme Court rejected the author's cassation appeal.
The Supreme Court rejected that application by decision dated 20 April 2007.
According to the State party,the High Court and Supreme Court rejected the contention that the Justice Minister's discretion had been exercised in an arbitrary or capricious manner.
The Supreme Court rejected the defendant's claims and held that the Italian court had jurisdiction.
On 16 January 1997, the Supreme Court rejected the author's motion for a rehearing of his case.
The Supreme Court rejected the arguments and affirmed the County Court's decision to enforce the award.
On 4 December, a panel of three local andtwo EULEX judges at the Supreme Court rejected an appeal filed by Amir Sopa, who had been sentenced to 10 years of imprisonment on charges of terrorism.
The Supreme Court rejected the author's allegations related to bias, on the ground that there was no objective and real ground for questioning the ability of judges to hear the case.
On 1 April 2005, the Supreme Court rejected the author's complaint proceedings and confirmed the High Court's decision.
The Supreme Court rejected as groundless the author's allegations that both brothers were subjected to torture during the preliminary investigation, and that the court ignored their statements in this regard.
On 16 July 2001, the Supreme Court rejected the appeal and upheld the decision of the Burgos Provincial Court. .
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, taking the view that the judgement appealed against used as a legal basis various provisions of the Vienna Convention: CISG articles 50, 31(c), 30, 53 et seq, 58, 36(2) and 45 in conjunction with 46 3.