Примеры использования This jurisprudence на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It sees no reason to depart from this jurisprudence.
This jurisprudence has been upheld in subsequent cases.
The Court affirmed and further developed this jurisprudence in a number of cases.
This jurisprudence has also been applied to expulsion procedures.
In the current case, the Committee has not applied this jurisprudence with consistency.
This jurisprudence, however, cannot be applied to the State party.
Unfortunately, the Government recognizes that this jurisprudence has not been sufficiently publicized.
This jurisprudence has been affirmed and further developed in a number of cases.
Ronald Reagan's conservative revolution challenged this jurisprudence first with Gale Norton's works and then with writer Richard Epstein.
This jurisprudence has also consistently been applied to deportation proceedings.
Staff are carefully following the developments in the system andmay delay seeking protection until this jurisprudence is more settled.
The Committee applied this jurisprudence also in case No. 1576/2007 Kly v. Canada.
The Administrative Tribunal consistently recognized the broad discretion of the Secretary-General in disciplinary matters, butcertain judgements of the Dispute Tribunal have reflected a substantial departure from this jurisprudence.
It notes that this jurisprudence has also been applied to removal proceedings.
Lastly, Belgium supports the Commission in its reference to the jurisprudence established by the European Court of Human Rights in the Bosphorus case butdoubts whether the draft text adequately reflects this jurisprudence.
Based on this jurisprudence, the Bavarian law gave the following definition of an assembly.
Human rights dimensions of education are litigated but such jurisprudence is found under education law, while no analysis has yet identified the nature andscope of human rights which this jurisprudence outlines.
In the period under review, this jurisprudence was confirmed by the Committee in case No. 731/1996 Robinson v. Jamaica.
This jurisprudence may be useful to examine for purposes of identifying appropriate measures when preparing an individual complaint.
This jurisprudence also implies that there is no effective remedy when such acts and omissions are challenged.
The matter was whether this jurisprudence was sufficient or whether there was a need for complementary standards.
This jurisprudence was reaffirmed and further developed by the Court in the recent case of Efrain Bamaca Velasquez against Guatemala.
The author affirms that this jurisprudence can only be relied on in case of confession of the accused, and that he never confessed.
All this jurisprudence has, together with the exclusion of certain categories of persons from capital punishment in the text of article 6, in effect narrowed down any use of capital punishment.
The Committee considers that this jurisprudence also applies to child protection proceedings, which relate to the removal of parental authority and access of a parent to his or her child.
This jurisprudence was relied on by the International Court of Justice in another context in the Nottebohm case and was given explicit approval by Italian-United States Conciliation Commission in the Mergé claim in 1955.
There is no reason why this jurisprudence should not continue to develop, with cases proliferating as recourse to judicial procedures finds increasing favour.
This jurisprudence also suggests that no formal superior-subordinate relationship is required for a finding of"ordering" so long as it is demonstrated that the person accused possessed the authority to order.
In the period under review, this jurisprudence was confirmed by the Committee in cases Nos. 610/1995(Nicolas Henry v. Jamaica), 618/1995(Barrington Campbell v. Jamaica), 649/1995(Winston Forbes v. Jamaica) and 775/1997 Christopher Brown v. Jamaica.