Примеры использования Threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon states на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Any threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
Formal statements have been made holding out the threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
The exchange of views between delegations revealed and articulated the organic relationship between the provisions enshrined in theUnited Nations Charter and the assurances against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
They must refrain from making any threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
We do not believe that such guarantees have been given and, indeed,we believe that some recent developments have increased the threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
Bangladesh reiterates that the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States is in contravention of negative security assurances.
Until such time as nuclear disarmament is achieved, it is necessary that negative security assurances be provided against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
India shall also not resort to use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
However, pending the attainment of this goal, it is imperative that we have in place effective international arrangements to prevent the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
Bangladesh reiterates that the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States is in contravention of negative security assurances.
At the same time, we welcome unilateral statements by the nuclear-weapon States regarding their policies on renouncing the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
Nicaragua urged the nuclear-weapon States to commit to the non-use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States, and in the interim, to uphold their negative security guarantees.
He called on the conference to adopt decisions banning the development andproduction of new nuclear weapons and banning the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
The Review also stipulated the possible use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States, in contravention of the assurances given by the nuclear-weapon States in 1968 and 1995.
In the meantime, effective assurances were needed to prohibit the use or the threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
He emphasized the importance of the policy of renouncing the first-use of nuclear weapons and the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States. At both the 1995 and the 2000 review conferences,States parties had recognized that the nuclear non-proliferation regime would be strengthened by legally binding security assurances given by the five nuclearweapon States to non-nuclear-weapon States which were parties to the NPT.
We consider it an additional tool to prevent proliferationof nuclear weapons and provide assurances against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
We wish to reiterate that making provision for the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States is in contravention to the negative security assurances that have been provided by the nuclear-weapon States. .
In that regard, the previous Review Conference had considered Nigeria's draft agreement on the prohibition of the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States parties to the Treaty.
Concerning negative security assurances, which has a Committee withinthe Conference on Disarmament, the Non-Aligned Ministerial Meeting called upon the Conference on Disarmament to reach an urgent agreement on the provisions of an international legally binding treaty prohibiting the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
The Conference should also adopt a decision prohibiting the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
It is vital that, within the Conference on Disarmament, we can agree on a legally binding international instrument which clearly andcredibly prohibits the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
Until such a convention was concluded,nuclear-weapon States must refrain from development and research on nuclear weapons; threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States; modernization of nuclear weapons and their facilities; deployment of nuclear weapons in the territories of other countries; and maintaining their nuclear weapons on hair-trigger alert.
The responsibility of the nuclear Powers in the implementation of the results of our meetings on this subject is of primary importance,particularly for the purpose of banishing for ever any resort to the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States.
These unilateral declarations, however, are inadequate to prevent the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States, as they could be withdrawn.
These include, inter alia, the commitment to the total elimination of nuclear weapons, opposition to the nuclear deterrent doctrine characterized by the first use of nuclear weapons, the call for an unconditional commitment of nuclear-weapon States to the non-first-use of nuclear weapons and the early commencement of negotiations on an international legal instrument on the non-use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States or nuclear-weapon-free zones.
Until the goal of nuclear disarmament has been reached, negative security assurances must be provided against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States. We have yet to reach a consensus on the most appropriate way of providing such guarantees.
The fact that some major Power has updated its strategic defence doctrine spelling out new rationales for the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States is of particular concern.
The delegation of China supported the negotiation andearly conclusion of an international agreement on the non-use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States, which would have a positive impact on the CTBT negotiations and the NPT Review Conference of 1995.
It advocated negotiations on, and conclusion of, an international agreement on thenon-first-use of nuclear weapons, and on the non-use or threat of use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear-weapon States and nuclear-weapon-free zones. 14/.