Примеры использования Threat of weapons на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
A whole generation has now lived under the threat of weapons that can cause mass annihilation.
To reduce the threat of weapons of mass destruction, we are working with Russia to reduce our nuclear arsenals by two thirds.
Moreover, it is in the common interest of all peoples not to live with the threat of weapons of mass destruction.
In the Cold War, Americans lived under the threat of weapons of mass destruction, but believed that deterrents made those weapons a last resort.
Only by doing so will we be able to gradually build a world that is filled with peace and free from the threat of weapons of mass destruction.
Люди также переводят
Regarding the threat of weapons of mass destruction, I refer agenda item 70,"Establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the region of the Middle East.
We recommitted ourselves, among other things, to pursuing the goal of a world at peace,free from the threat of weapons of mass destruction.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has always underlined the threat of weapons of mass destruction in international forums and in its contacts with other countries.
Our duty to fight all these forces of destruction is directly linked to our efforts to reduce the threat of weapons of mass destruction.
Indonesia believes that the focus on the threat of weapons of mass destruction should not lessen the attention to the regulation and reduction of conventional weapons.
To that end, it is essential to have the support of civil society in our efforts-- our joint efforts-- to promote disarmament and eliminate the threat of weapons of mass destruction.
While the threat of weapons of mass destruction is frightening, the truth is that small arms and light weapons do most of the killing.
The experience of the Nunn-Lugar program has demonstrated that the threat of weapons of mass destruction can lead to extraordinary outcomes based on mutual interest.
Indeed, the threat of weapons of mass destruction terrorism is real and the danger posed by terrorist acts using weapons of mass destruction is ominous.
This means that, given the modernization of weapons andtheir capability and accuracy, the threat of weapons of mass destruction has not yet been adequately lessened.
We feel strongly that the focus on the threat of weapons of mass destruction and their proliferation should not divert attention from the regulation and reduction of conventional weapons.
Such weapons must be eventually eliminated, without discrimination, if we are sincere in our resolve to create a peaceful andsecure world free from the threat of weapons of mass destruction.
It promotes dialogue andcooperation in international forums, since the threat of weapons of mass destruction is a global one and must be dealt with at the planetary level.
The threat of weapons of mass destruction and the daily suffering inflicted by small arms and light weapons, anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions have to give us pause.
This derives from our collective concern to spare no effort to shield human civilization once and for all from any threat of weapons of mass destruction and any threat of annihilation.
The threat of weapons of mass destruction looms over all of us, but we should not be complacent about small arms and light weapons either, for they are the real culprits, causing death and destruction every day.
They are, therefore, essential instruments in the hands of the international community to enhance security,jointly operate inspection systems and reduce the threat of weapons of mass destruction.
But we must not lose heart, because if we wish it,we can still have a world where the threat of weapons of mass destruction-- whether nuclear, chemical or biological-- has been eradicated forever.
But today I want to focus particularly on the subject of non-proliferation and disarmament,where recent events have brought us to a crossroads in our attempts to steer the world away from the threat of weapons of mass destruction.
Furthermore, the continued potential threat of weapons of mass destruction(WMD)-- in particular to international peace and security-- means that questions of potential non-compliance will remain front and centre.
It would also allow the powerful-- be they individual States or groups-- to prevail, given the obvious lack of a real commitment to multilateralism and to the agreements and treaties governing the proliferation,production and threat of weapons.
The best way to counter the threat of weapons of mass destruction was to strengthen multilateral disarmament and arms control instruments, promote international cooperation and institute appropriate verification mechanisms.
Events and statements clearly indicate the importance of world cooperation, based on a binding treaty,to eliminate the burden and threat of weapons of mass destruction as a first step that might encourage the taking of other steps.
The positions spelled out in those two statements on the major issues on our Committee's agenda are in line with the aspirations of the Congolese people and Government for a safer world, a prosperous world,free from the threat of weapons and living in solidarity.
A number of delegations before me have expressed serious concern that the disarmament process is going slowly and that the threat of weapons of mass destruction continues to hang over mankind 25 years after the first special session of the General Assembly devoted to disarmament.