Примеры использования To a statute of limitations на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Those crimes should not be subject to a statute of limitations regardless of when they were committed.
Claims relating to reparations for gross violations of human rights shall not be subject to a statute of limitations.
Offences defined in article 70 shall be subject to a statute of limitations. It was agreed that a statute of limitations should apply.
The Committee notes with concern that actsamounting to torture and ill-treatment are subject to a statute of limitations.
The CHAIRMAN, summing up the debate,said that many delegations were opposed to a statute of limitations with respect to core crimes, although some distinguished between war crimes and other core crimes.
The principle should prevail that claims relating to reparations for gross violations of human rights shall not be subject to a statute of limitations.
It also mentioned that the offence of torture is subject to a statute of limitations varying from 10 to 20 years.
The State party should amend this Act in consideration of the fact that torture,because of its serious nature, should not be subject to a statute of limitations.
Crimes of torture committed in the course of arrest ordetention were not subject to a statute of limitations, and anyone who participated in, ordered or practised torture would be held to account.
The following wording is suggested for the second part of item 15:"Claims relating to reparations for crimes against humanity shall not be subject to a statute of limitations.
Support was expressed for the absence of any reference to a statute of limitations in draft article 46.
The Criminal Code includes new crimes such as torture, forced disappearance and the violations of the laws of war andacknowledges that they are not subject to a statute of limitations.
It is also concerned that the crime of torture is subject to a statute of limitations of 10 years for prosecution and 15 years for punishment, which may result in impunity for perpetrators of acts of torture arts. 2 and 4.
It was concerned that the offence of torture may be subject to a statute of limitations after 15 years.
Noting, with reference to article 4 of the Convention, that the victims of torture sometimes had to wait for years before obtaining redress,he wondered whether acts of torture perpetrated by State officials were subject to a statute of limitations.
The Committee is also concerned that, while the Constitution provides that crimes involving physical orpsychological torture should not be subject to a statute of limitations, the criminal procedure law may include a statute of limitations arts. 1 and 4.
The Committee also notes with concern that the offence of torture, which as such does not exist in the Latvian Criminal Code but rather is punishable under other provisions of the Criminal Code,might in some cases be subject to a statute of limitations.
If these are mass killings, they will constitute a crime against humanity which is not subject to a statute of limitations, according to the 1968 Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity.
However, the cases submitted by the Truth Commission concerning events during the period 1984- 2008 would present a major challenge in that regard,since many of the crimes committed were not subject to a statute of limitations.
It was suggested that article 52 should state that the international crimes listed under article 19 should not be subject to a statute of limitations in accordance with the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity.
Full examination of a French extradition request was still pending when the appeal court ordered his release on the grounds that the crimes of which he was accused were subject to a statute of limitations.
Lastly, it should be stated in article 52 that the international crimes listed under article 19 should not be subject to a statute of limitations, which would bring it into line with the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity.
The Committee also regrets the lack of information provided as to whether the offence of torture, which is punishable under other provisions of the Criminal Code,may in some cases be subject to a statute of limitations.
It is also concerned that acts of torture and attempts to commit torture, as well as acts by persons that constitute complicity orparticipation in torture, are subject to a statute of limitations of 10 years in most cases, which may result in impunity for perpetrators of such acts arts. 2 and 4.
However, in September, while full examination of a French extradition request was still pending, the Rome Appeal Court ordered his release,on the grounds that the crimes of which he was accused were subject to a statute of limitations.
As part of the extradition proceedings, the Rome Court of Appeal had ruled that the crimes of which he had been accused were subject to a statute of limitations, which was surprising, as it was not normal practice in extradition proceedings for the judicial authorities to examine the substance of the case.
She also asked the Turkmen delegation to indicate whether the offences mentioned in articles 113(torture), 107(intentionally causing serious bodily harm) and108(intentionally causing moderate bodily harm) of the Criminal Code were subject to a statute of limitations.
It recalls that crimes against humanity are not subject to a statute of limitations and draws the State party's attention to its general comment No. 20(1992), on article 7, according to which amnesties for serious violations of human rights are incompatible with the Covenant, and its general comment No. 31(2004), on the nature of the general legal obligation imposed on States parties to the Covenant.
From the point of view of international law, these violations should be regarded as crimes against humanity and, consequently,not subject to a statute of limitations and coming under universal jurisdiction.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether Moldova intended to ratify the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which defined crimes against humanity, including torture, and war crimes andstipulated that such crimes were not subject to a statute of limitations.