Примеры использования To his complaint на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Neither has replied to his complaint.
The documents appended to his complaint reflected that he had been detained several times in Sri Lanka.
The doctor delicately examines the patient and listens to his complaints.
According to the ICK's editor Gela Mtivlishvili the final response to his complaint will be officially provided by the Ministry within a few days.
He claims, however, that the Greek authorities did not pay attention to his complaints.
He submits that the State party has not responded to his complaint that it has failed to hold accountable police and prosecutors for their wrong doings.
After investigation, the Company gives the Client a reasoned answer to his complaint.
He emphasizes that the State party provided copies of the covering letters attached to his complaints to different authorities, but not his complaints or the replies received.
It was only on appeal that the author complained, for the first time, of the failure to apply the procedure for serious offences to his complaint.
In early 2018, Rickleton told media that he had received a response from the security services to his complaint about his deportation and was planning to file an appeal.
In its statement of 8 June 2000, the State party notes that the author did not indicate at any stage that the procedure for serious offences was to be applied to his complaint.
The author refers to the response of the General Prosecutor's office to his complaint, which stated that he did not mention the death threats to any of his accomplices in escape.
The Secretary-General or the Rapporteur on new complaints and interim measures may request clarification from the complainant concerning the applicability of article 22 of the Convention to his complaint, in particular regarding.
Pursuant to his complaint to the Speaker a"select committee" was set up to look into his complaint, however because of the"undemocratic prorogation to the parliament", this matter was not considered.
In January 2012, Shoukhrat Roustamov was sentenced to a pay a fine for libel in relation to his complaints about violations of the law.
He also points out that the State party makes no reference in its reply to his complaint to the Committee of interference in private communications, and he therefore takes it the State party admits that violation of the Covenant.
The doctor determines the possible cause of the syndrome by examining the patient,listening to his complaints and studying his medical record.
The complainant appends to his complaint a number of press articles showing that returned Haitians are systematically detained in appalling conditions and are given no food, water or medical care, which in the complainant's case could prove fatal.
It further concedes that the author has exhausted domestic remedies with respect to his complaints about prison conditions.
With regard to his complaint under article 12 of the Covenant, the author recalls the case law of the Committee, which states that remedies that are manifestly futile need not be exhausted in order to meet the requirements of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
The author maintains that he gained access to the 1998 rulingonly in June 2001, when the Constitutional Court rejected, on the merits, a claim by the author unrelated to his complaint before the Committee.
The complainant added to his complaint, inter alia, medical certificates issued in 2006 and 2007, by Swedish medical specialists, who concluded that the complainant suffered from post-traumatic stress syndrome and depression, and that he would need a long and continuous treatment.
He stated that he had filed a complaint through his lawyer against the officers who had mistreatedhim on SNR premises, but that there had not as yet been any judicial follow-up to his complaint.
It disputes the author's argument that the present circumstances of his incarceration are irrelevant to his complaint, which arises from his individual experience on particular days, with particular individuals, and not from an express legislative provision of general application.
The author also maintains that the observations that he has made with regard to necessity andproportionality in relation to his claim under article 18 also apply to his complaint under articles 2 and 26 of the Covenant.
Further, with regard to his complaints against the Spanish Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Committee notes that the complainant did not make use of the remedy of amparo, which the State party contends is an available and effective remedy, citing a number of cases before the Constitutional Court in support of this proposition, whereas the complainant claims that amparo would not have resulted in any relief, citing relevant case law.
In a submission dated 20 March 1995, the State party confirms that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies in regard to his complaint about the procedure adopted at the preliminary enquiry.
As regards the State party's claim that he has not exhausted domestic remedies with regard to his complaint about police treatment, the author submits that, in fact, he has addressed complaints to the Police Complaints Tribunal, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission and the Parliamentary Ombudsman, all to no avail.
The modification of his sentence by the Supreme Court is a question of legality relating to the remedy of appeal in cassation that poses no impediment to his complaint relating to the absence of a second hearing.
The Court did not need to decide on that point as the claimant failed to comply with a second provision of the arbitration rules,which requires that the claimant file its request for challenge"without undue delay" after he became aware of the event giving rise to his complaint.