Примеры использования To reduce nuclear arsenals на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Multilateral agreement to reduce nuclear arsenals by a certain number or percentage.
His delegation was very concerned at the slow progress made in recent years to reduce nuclear arsenals.
Actions taken to reduce nuclear arsenals and an assessment of where we stand now from achieving nuclear disarmament.
We insist on continuing talks; we are not only in favour of talks, butinsist on continuing talks to reduce nuclear arsenals.
Delegations also stressed that more efforts should be made to reduce nuclear arsenals, unilaterally, bilaterally and multilaterally.
I simply note that improving the strategic situation, to which we all contribute,is always a necessary precondition for taking steps to reduce nuclear arsenals.
These countries are, among other things,meant to take irreversible measures to reduce nuclear arsenals with a view to general and complete disarmament.
All efforts to reduce nuclear arsenals shall include the complete and irreversible elimination of nuclear warheads, including the placing of fissile materials from those warheads under IAEA safeguards.
The statements by the Russian and United States delegations on the efforts that their countries are making to reduce nuclear arsenals are evidence that this is true.
Spain welcomes the measures adopted to reduce nuclear arsenals and urges all nuclear-weapon States to pursue their efforts to honour this undertaking.
I would also like to emphasize how much this decision runs counter to the efforts being made by one and all to reduce nuclear arsenals until they have been totally eliminated.
Unilateral or bilateral initiatives to reduce nuclear arsenals do not amount to effective nuclear disarmament, for they are not irreversible, verifiable or transparent.
Nevertheless, as long as an estimated 27,000 nuclear weapons remain in existence,it is patently clear that further concrete efforts to reduce nuclear arsenals are required.
Russia has been taking consistent steps to reduce nuclear arsenals and place qualitative limitations on them, both unilaterally and on a bilateral footing with the United States of America.
The beginning of the review process of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons(NPT), scheduled for 1997, should, inter alia,give fresh impetus to our work to reduce nuclear arsenals.
Moreover, the five nuclear-weapon States had agreed on the need for further efforts to reduce nuclear arsenals and to work towards a world free from nuclear weapons.
The treaty would also seek to prohibit the diversion of fissile material destined for civilian use for prohibited purposes orthe diversion of material recovered as a part of measures to reduce nuclear arsenals.
Their demonstration of political will andadequate measures taken to reduce nuclear arsenals would make substantial contribution to the maintenance and reinforcement of international peace and stability.
In this context, inventories must be compiled of military and civilian fissile material, including material recovered from nuclear weapons that are covered by bilateral accords andunilateral measures to reduce nuclear arsenals.
Although some measures had been taken over recent years to reduce nuclear arsenals, Algeria was disappointed in the lack of progress towards nuclear disarmament.
Nevertheless, his delegation was heartened by recent initiatives taken by Governments, international organizations and civil society to address nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, in particular national policies andbilateral agreements to reduce nuclear arsenals.
We are aware of the fact that steps have been taken in recent years to reduce nuclear arsenals and, in this regard, the START Treaty and the conclusions of the 2010 NPT Review Conference are particularly noteworthy.
We hope that the other nuclear-weapon States will make similar orfurther efforts to reduce nuclear arsenals, in accordance with their commitments made at the 1995 and 2000 NPT Review Conferences.
Notwithstanding commendable measures to reduce nuclear arsenals, nuclear weapons continued to be relied on in strategic doctrines; such measures must be distinguished from steps towards nuclear disarmament: they would not automatically translate into a nuclear-weapon-free world.
Fourthly, we all know that the effectiveness of the non-proliferation regime depends on systematic andprogressive efforts to reduce nuclear arsenals globally, with the ultimate goal of eliminating them, and that these efforts will be successful only within the context of an effective non-proliferation regime.
Japan commends the efforts by the United States andthe Russian Federation to reduce nuclear arsenals, in accordance with the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty, the Moscow Treaty, and encourages them to undertake nuclear arms reductions beyond those provided for by the Treaty, stressing the importance of the principles of irreversibility, verifiability and increased transparency.
Yet, while the past 10 years have witnessed important steps to reduce nuclear arsenals, there has been no clear commitment on the part of nuclear-weapon States to proceed rapidly to nuclear disarmament, as required by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons NPT.
The contribution made by the Start process to reducing nuclear arsenals is well known.
Arrangements concluded outside the Treaty with a view to reducing nuclear arsenals were welcome, as long as they complemented the Treaty and did not attempt to replace it.
Belgium took the view that the clue to the total elimination of nuclear weapons was a firm commitment to reducing nuclear arsenals.