Примеры использования Working group had noted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group had noted some overlap between two of the services selection procedures and the request for proposals procedure in the Model Law.
It was explained that,at its fifty-third session, the Working Group had noted that two possible types of amicus curiae should be distinguished and perhaps considered differently.
The Working Group had noted that the Secretariat would prepare the first full draft report of the Conference for consideration by the Preparatory Committee at its 1998 session.
In paragraph 32 of its first report(A/49/43), the Working Group had noted the suggestions of Member States that studies might be undertaken on innovative approaches to raising funds.
The Working Group had noted that PM2.5 was recommended as a health effect indicator, but PM10 would still be used as an air quality standard.
In a brief overall analysis of the situation of the four States parties in question, the pre-session working group had noted that the majority of the reports reviewed had followed the Committee guidelines and that the States parties had made an effort to implement the Convention through legislative and other measures, and through increasing cooperation with non-governmental organizations.
The Working Group had noted that cooperation with EMEP and the Working Group on Strategies and Review was very good and producing excellent results.
At the same time, the Working Group had noted that there was still a large number of complaints in regard to which no investigations had been carried out.
The Working Group had noted that each of those types of instrument might not, of itself, completely satisfy the requirements of each and every topic that might need to be addressed.
During its visit to the United States in July 2009, the Working Group had noted that the United States Government had taken steps to ensure that the Baghdad tragedy of 2007 did not happen again and had adopted legislation and regulations aimed at strengthening oversight and accountability of private military and security companies.
The Working Group had noted the role played by Morocco's Equity and Reconciliation Commission(IER), which served as an example for other countries, in particular in the region.
In its statement at the conclusion of the mission, the Working Group had noted that despite the measures taken by the Government, historic injustices continued to deeply affect the lives of millions of Afro-Brazilians, who made up more than half the population and who continued to face structural, institutional and interpersonal racism.
The Working Group had noted that the Commission's work on“prevention” was already at an advanced stage and that it had provisionally adopted many of the draft articles on that area.
In conclusion, the working group had noted that although the guidelines had been made known to the other treaty bodies, they had not yet taken any decision on them.
The working group had noted that the report had not been drafted in accordance with the Committee's guidelines, and did not respond to comments made by the Committee in considering Peru's initial report.
The Working Group had noted the overall social and economic marginalization of indigenous peoples, which limited their ability to assert their rights and excluded them from negotiations and consultations.
The Working Group had noted an additional difficulty connected with the fact that the Commission had attempted to deal with the two distinct issues of“prevention” and“liability” under the same topic.
Moreover, as the working group had noted, even greater caution was required when a national court dealt with prejudgement measures, since they were taken before any ruling on the merits of the case were made.
At that time, the Working Group had noted that licensing of intellectual property rights was generally outside the scope of the Convention, which had been conceived for the sale of tangible goods.
After the Working Group had noted the various views expressed and the fact that there was insufficient support for deleting the subparagraph, it was decided that the provision should be retained for future consideration.
Moreover, as the Working Group had noted, even greater caution was required when a national court dealt with prejudgement measures, since they were taken before any ruling on the merits of the case was made.
The working group had noted that one of the limitations of the intercommittee and chairpersons' meetings was that, since neither mechanism had any real decision-making powers and they met only once a year, it could take several years for an outcome to be reached.
The working group had noted the major social, economic and political changes that had occurred in the four States parties since their previous reports and had found, among other things, that the statistical data in some of the reports were outdated and that information was lacking on the implementation of programmes.
At the same time, however, the Working Group had noted that, although draft paragraphs 4 and 5 had been inserted to address a particular problem raised by arbitration agreements, the usefulness of those provisions extended beyond that limited field in view of possible obstacles to electronic commerce that might result from various other requirements concerning original form.
However, the Working Group had noted that in a transaction involving a multiplicity of intellectual property rights used as collateral for credit, application of a rule referring to the law of the protecting State would result in parties having to meet the requirements for creation, third-party effectiveness, priority and enforcement of multiple jurisdictions.
The Working Group had noted that the Secretary-General had sent emissaries to several countries in group C which would be asked to make voluntary contributions that would, in effect, move them in the direction of group B. However, the Working Group was not aware of the outcome of that work, except that one Member State had informed the Secretary-General that it was willing to increase its rate of assessment for peace-keeping contributions.
The Working Group has noted the prominence that the Declaration on the Right to Development gives to peace and security as essential conditions for realization of the right to development.
The Working Group has noted, however, that prosecutions of these companies and their employees remain rare.
The Working Group has noted the information provided by the Government of Turkey in its submissions that the cases are subject to various domestic appeals and review procedures.
The Working Group has noted that chapter III, dealing with the modalities for seeking compensation and other relief, have been drafted in a flexible manner and do not impose"categorical obligations.