Примеры использования Would decide how на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Once it had been submitted,the Committee would decide how to proceed.
The drafting group would decide how to incorporate the United States proposal into paragraph 2.
Depending on the responses received from the communicant, the Committee would decide how to proceed with the case at its next meeting.
Again, the COP would decide how often the assessment is conducted and by which body and/or institution.
The replies to the useful questionnaire on legal issues related to aerospace objects should provide the basis upon which the Subcommittee would decide how to continue its deliberations.
I thought we had discussed that I would decide how I wanted to spend my time and my life.
Mr. Mselle(Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions)said that he would convey the request to the Advisory Committee, which would decide how to proceed.
Depending on the information received, the Committee would decide how to proceed with the case at its thirty-fifth or thirty-sixth meeting.
Some delegations appeared to support a corporate approach to resource management,whereby Member States would merely approve the overall level of resources and the Secretary-General would decide how best to utilize them.
The Committee agreed that it would decide how to proceed with communication ACCC/C/2010/45 at its thirty-sixth meeting.
Responding to several representatives' concerns regarding the legal ramifications of the various proposals for achieving synergies, the Senior Legal Officer of UNEP, serving as Legal Adviser to the conferences of the Parties,said that, inasmuch as the Conference of the Parties for each convention would decide how the secretariat should perform under that convention, the appointment of a joint head of the conventions would in no way impinge on their legal autonomy or status.
The Commission would decide how to proceed on the basis of the Working Group's report and would issue an additional mandate, if necessary, concerning MSMEs.
He had been informed by the coordinator of the draft decision that the Board would be able to include the request made in the draft decision in its work programme and would decide how to assign the work, since it was understood that the Board would not be able to report to the General Assembly until sometime in 1995.
He noted that the Committee would decide how to handle the question raised by the Western Shoshone after the meeting with the representatives of that tribe at one of the subsequent Committee meetings.
The Commission decided to request its secretariat, in consultation with the organizations and the staff, to prepare a needs analysis and background documentation for the fifty-first session of ICSC,at which time the Commission would decide how it wished to proceed with this matter; the Commission could, for example, form a working group of the whole with the organizations and staff or delegate it to a small group during that session.
If that should happen,the General Assembly would decide how to proceed; but for the time being the $5.3 million requirement could be covered by the contingency fund. See A/C.5/47/SR.51, paras. 46 and 50.
As to the Committee's conclusions,the Government would decide how best to ensure that they were disseminated in the United Kingdom context.
In line with those responsibilities, the Fifth Committee would decide how to meet the requirements arising from the decisions of the Third Committee.
After discussing items in depth for the first time, the working groups would decide how best to continue their consideration of them in order to complete work at the last session of the INCD or before.
The Committee would decide on how to proceed with those two communications after it had received the response of the Party concerned.
The IPCC had placed before the Parties the findings of the AR4 and Parties would need to decide how to use them.
It would decide at its sixth session how this item would be included in the work programme.
After receiving the revised document, the Committee would decide on how to proceed.
The Meeting of States Parties would also have to decide how these resources would be provided.
The Commission would need to decide how that difference should be reflected in the draft articles.
In such a case, the Committee would have to decide how it wished to treat the results of such pilot reviews.
The Second Committee would then have to decide how to proceed; it could elect to reopen discussion of the agenda item.
Similarly there was no basis whatsoever for the argument that the Advisory Committee was recommending assessment on Member States and would later decide how the funds would be spent.
In case the proposed definitions are adopted, AC.3 would have to decide how to incorporate these definitions into the formal framework under the 1998 Agreement.
The Security Council would need to decide how any such period of difference would be handled, including whether the mechanism(s) would commence while one of the Tribunals was completing its work.