Приклади вживання Committee considers Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
- 
                        Colloquial
                    
- 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
- 
                        Computer
                    
Scholarship committee considers:.
The committee considers that the assessment of political decisions and their effects is the prerogative of parliaments and, ultimately, of the electorate, and not of the courts.
This General Commentthus aims to identify some of the principal issues which the Committee considers to be important in relation to this right.
Rada's Committee considers draft laws on referenda.
The Committee considers that the new legal framework adopted in Russia encourages discrimination, hate speech and violence against LGBTI community members.
Integrating comments received: Responsible technical committee considers comments received during public enquiry and prepares the final draft European standard.
The Committee considers as options to purchase two types of tanks- Russian T-90(in variants of the T-90S or T-90MS) and Chinese(presumably VT4/ MBT-3000).
The Lustration Committee considers a case regarding the submission of a false declaration.
The Committee considers as options to purchase two types of tanks- Russian T-90(in variants of the T-90S or T-90MS) and Chinese(presumably VT4/ MBT-3000).
Tender Committee considers submitted applications and determines the winner;
Consequently, the Committee considers that those dismissals constitute an attack on the independence of the judiciary protected by article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
The committee considers that democracy and the rule of law require that politicians shall be effectively protected from criminal prosecutions based on their political decisions.
The Committee considers such a dialogue as an opportunity"for promoting the fundamental values and principles upon which European culture has based itself and along which it has developed.".
The committee considers the fight against the impunity of perpetrators of serious human rights violations as a priority for the Council of Europe and all national and international law enforcement bodies.
The committee considers that the new political environment following the events on Maidan between 18 and 21 February, and the resulting change of power, has opened a window of opportunity for Ukraine's democratic development.
In this regard, the Committee considers that instances of forced eviction are prima facie incompatible with the requirements of the Covenant and can only be justified in the most exceptional circumstances, and in accordance with the relevant principles of international law.
Furthermore, the Committee considers that the circumstances referred to in Presidential Decree No. 144 could not be accepted by it in this specific case as grounds justifying the fact that the dismissal measures were in conformity with the law and, in particular, with article 4 of the Covenant.
In these circumstances, the Committee considers that the author's dismissal from his position as a judge of the Constitutional Court, several years before the expiry of the term for which he had been appointed, constituted an attack on the independence of the judiciary and failed to respect the author's right of access, on general terms of equality, to public service in his country.
Profile Committee considers it directed the Committee  on Budget and amendments of the table presents the results of consideration of amendments to the Budget Committee,  which reviews these materials, make a decision, creates a summary table of amendments, recommended for acceptance or rejection, and brings them to the State Duma.
The Committee considered that proposition and turned it down.
The Committee considered the proposals, knowing them only by their code names.
The committee considered two things.
The Committee considered two general.
The Health Committee considered 2 cases.
A profile parliamentary committee considered the document at its meeting on September 20 and recommended it for adoption by the parliament in general.
The Committee considered that he had been arbitrarily detained, tortured and denied his right to a fair trial.
The Committee considered the proposal to make the statutory rule at its meeting on 9 December 2015.
It is worth noting that the set of documents,which is submitted to the selection Committee considered separately the two teachers who select the standing of the candidates in the students.