Примери за използване на Court declared на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Consequently the Court declared that the relevant provisions were invalid.
On 3 July 2001, after obtaining the parties' observations, the Court declared the application admissible.
The Court declared that it would announce its ruling as soon as possible.
By a decision of 5 March 2002, the Court declared the application admissible.
The court declared five articles of the law constitutionally incompatible on December 8th.
By a decision of 5 March 2009, the Court declared the application partly admissible.
The court declared immoral his influence on society on occasiontoday's widely held attitudes about open marriage and divorce.
By a decision of 12 September 2002, the Court declared the remainder of the application admissible.
The court declared the laws referring to the overall pension reduction and the special pension cuts as unconstitutional and sent them back to parliament for revision.
By a decision of 4 December 2007, the Court declared the application partly admissible and partly inadmissible.
Imprisoned opposition leaders, including Felix Kulov, were released andthe Kyrgyz Supreme Court declared the election results invalid.
Nevertheless, the court declared the application admissible in 1998.
On 1 February 2000,having obtained the parties' observations, the Court declared the applications admissible.
On that basis the court declared the request inadmissible as it had not been submitted by Patriarch Maxim.
In a decision celebrated by privacy advocates,the Czech Constitutional Court declared in March 2011 that the Czech data retention law was unconstitutional.
Spain's constitutional court declared the Catalan referendum illegal and hundreds of people were injured as police used force to try to block voting.
Juan Guaidó declared himself president because the legitimate Venezuelan Supreme Court declared Maduro's new presidential term as illegitimate since he was only victorious because of- yet another- sham election.
The court declared the PiS's judicial rule changes unconstitutional, but the PiS-led government refused to publish the court's decision, thereby blocking it from taking effect.
By a decision of 14 September 2010, the Court declared the application partly admissible and partly inadmissible.
The Court declared that such actions violate the balance between copyright protection and freedom of enterprise, the rights to privacy and freedom in obtaining knowledge and information.
In a decision of 10 April 2002 a five-member panel of the Supreme Administrative Court declared the appeal by the chairman and vice-chairman of the applicant bank's board of directors inadmissible and First Financial AD's appeal ill-founded.
The court declared that although the Flying V“was very original when it was released on the market in 1958, it cannot however deny the evolution of the market during the following 50 years, which was henceforward characterised by a wide variety of available shapes.”.
On 15 September 1999 the Federal Constitutional Court declared the applicant's constitutional complaint inadmissible under the principle of subsidiarity.
The Court declared that EU law does not preclude national legislation under which‘inertia selling' must be assessed in the light of the provisions of the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive with the result that, according to that legislation, the ARN, within the meaning of the Framework Directive, is not competent to penalise such conduct.
Test Achats judgment of 1 March 2011(Case C-236/09): the Court declared the invalidity of Article 5(2) of Council Directive 2004/113/EC as being contrary to the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services.
The Czech Constitutional Court declared in March 2011 that the Czech mandatory data retention law was unconstitutional.
On 9 March 2004 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaints concerning the length of the proceedings.
On 16 March 2010 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaint concerning the length of the proceedings to the Government.
The court declares bankruptcy by a ruling(bankruptcy ruling).
If the Court declares the application admissible, it shall.