Примери за използване на Irremovability на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The principle of irremovability of judges;
Irremovability and Immunity of Judges.
See CCJE Opinion No. 1(2001) on standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges.
Accordingly, that application undermines the principle of the irremovability of judges, which is essential to their independence.
The European Commission believes that these measures fundamentally undermine the principle of judicial independence,including the irremovability of judges.
Хората също превеждат
The court said the law"undermines the principle of the irremovability of judges, that principle being essential to their independence.".
In 1846, the already complex settlement laws were further complicated by an Act which introduced the new concept of'irremovability'.
The irremovability of judges during their term of office is a consequence of their independence and thus included in the guarantees of Article 6(1) ECHR 58.
Opinion no 1(2001) of the Consultative Council of European Judges on standards concerning the independence of the judiciary and the irremovability of judges.
(25) The new rules contradict the principle of irremovability of judges as a key element of the independence of judges as enshrined in the 2010 CoE Recommendation(para 49).
The union, rather than the parish, became the area of settlement andthe period of residency required for irremovability was reduced to one year.
It is true that the irremovability of judges by the executive during their term of office must in general be considered as a corollary of their independence and thus included in the guarantees of Article 6 para.
In particular, the lack of any criteria for prolongation of the mandates allow for undue discretion,undermining the principle of irremovability of judges.
It is true that the irremovability of judges by the executive during their term of office must in general be considered as a corollary of their independence and thus included in the guarantees of Article 6.1.
In particular, the vague criteria for prolongation of the mandates allow for undue discretion,undermining the principle of irremovability of judges 119.
Here, I note that, pursuant to Article 52(3)of the Charter, EU law protects the principles of irremovability and independence of judges to the minimum threshold of protection afforded under the case-law of the ECtHR.
Brussels maintains that the law is“incompatible with EU law, since it undermines the principle of the independence of the judiciary,including the irremovability of judges”.
The principle of irremovability requires, in particular, that judges may remain in post provided that they have not reached the obligatory retirement age or until the expiry of their mandate, where that mandate is for a fixed term.
The Commission said that the supreme court law is“incompatible with EU law as it undermines the principle of judicial independence,including the irremovability of judges”.
However, the absence of a formal recognition of this irremovability in the law does not in itself imply lack of independence provided that it is recognised in fact and that the other necessary guarantees are present.”.
Such a premature termination of a constitutionally enshrined mandate constitutes a serious violation of the principle of irremovability and security of tenure.
The irremovability of judges, along with security of tenure, are also recognised as fundamental guarantees of judicial independence in guidelines(51) issued by European and international bodies relating to judicial independence.
The Commission further argues, inter alia,that the objective of aligning the retirement age of Supreme Court judges with the general retirement age cannot justify a violation of the principle of irremovability of judges.
In the light of the fact that irremovability of judges is an essential element of judicial independence, these standards provide only for very limited and specific exceptions from this principle to be applied only within the framework of due procedure.
The CJEU found that the retirement law, passed in 2018,"is not justified by a legitimate objective andundermines the principle of the irremovability of judges, that principle being essential to their independence.".
To fully guarantee the independence of the judiciary by ensuring that the principles of irremovability and guaranteed term of office of judges, the rules governing the structure and composition of the governing bodies of the judiciary and the safeguards on the independence of the Constitutional Court are enshrined in the Fundamental Law;
There are 12 members, members of the Audit Board, six members appointed by the Congreso de los Diputados andsix by the Senate entitled to the principles of independence, irremovability and incompatibilities, as well as the judges.
In the present case,the Commission has sufficiently demonstrated that the contested measures violate the principle of irremovability of judges, whose observance is necessary to meet the requirements of effective judicial protection under the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU.
As regards the first complaint, Poland argues that the Commission has not demonstrated the link between the change in the retirement age of the Supreme Court judges andalleged violation of the principle of irremovability of judges.
It refers to the guarantees of independence of judges enshrined in the Polish constitution,including the irremovability of judges, which implies that when a judge has reached the expected age, he retires.