Примери за използване на Suspected infringement на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Note the suspected infringement in the inspection report;
(b) take all necessary action to ensure safekeeping of the evidence pertaining to such suspected infringement;
The suspected infringement would, in fact, have been of a much more significant nature and magnitude.
And yet the Commission told its staff, explicitly or implicitly,to pay attention specifically to information that related to a second and different suspected infringement.
The limited nature of the information held on the second suspected infringement before the first inspection took place has also been stressed by the Commission at the hearing.
Those documents were discovered during an inspection which was unlawful as concerns the search for information relating to the second suspected infringement.
Nor do I see why the second suspected infringement should be considered, in the words of the General Court, as‘background information' on the first suspected infringement.
Initiative, and in cooperation with the competent authorities in the Member States, which shall give it their assistance,the Commission shall investigate cases of suspected infringement of these.
The only possible explanation[…] is that information on the DUSS suspected infringement was given to the Commission staff so that they could‘keep their eyes peeled' for evidence related to the second complaint”.
ABB has co-operated fully, on a continuous basis and expeditiously throughout the Commission's administrative procedure andprovided the Commission with all evidence available to it relating to the suspected infringement.
The only plausible explanation, to my mind, is that information on the DUSS suspected infringement was given to the Commission staff so that they could‘keep their eyes peeled' for evidence related to the second complaint.
On application by a Member State or on its own initiative, and in cooperation with the competent authorities in the Member States, who shall give it their assistance,the Commission shall investigate cases of suspected infringement of these principles.
ABB ended its involvement in the suspected infringement no later than the time at which it submitted evidence under the Leniency Notice and did not take steps to coerce other undertakings to participate in the infringement. .
It is clear from the case‑law cited in paragraph 171 above that the Commission is only required to state the essential features of the suspected infringement, in particular the nature of the suspected restrictions of competition.
ABB ended its involvement in the suspected infringement no later than the time at which it submitted evidence under the Leniency Notice and did not take steps to coerce other undertakings to participate in the infringement. .
Questioned at the hearing, the Commission was at pains to explain to the Court why information on the second suspected infringement was relevant in the context of a search for information relating to the first suspected infringement.
On application by a Member Nation or on its own initiative, and in cooperation with the competent authorities in Member Nations, which shall give it their assistance,the Global Judiciary shall investigate cases of suspected infringement of these principles.
In any event, even if the Commission had had sufficient evidence to order an ad hoc inspection regarding the second suspected infringement, I do not see how that would be enough to remedy the consequences flowing from a manifest breach of Article 20(4) of Regulation No 1/2003.
It should also be noted that the information allegedly available to the public, namely the ETE supply contract,was not sufficient to be able to determine precisely the existence and extent of a suspected infringement of Article 102 TFEU.
Thus, the Commission may legitimately take the view that it is necessary to order further inspections to enable it to establish the existence of the suspected infringement, even if it already has some indicia, or indeed proof, which it gathered during previous inspections, of the existence of an infringement. .
The decision concerned the potentially unjustified preferential treatment accorded by DB Energie to other Deutsche Bahn subsidiaries in the form of a rebate system for the supply of electric traction energy(‘the first suspected infringement').
Lastly, in the course of answering another question at the hearing,the Commission conceded that the search for information on the first suspected infringement was not necessarily made more effective by the fact that its staff had been briefed beforehand on the subject-matter of the second suspected infringement.
The second inspection decision concerned suspected competition infringements by the Deutsche Umschlagegesellschaft Schiene-Straße(‘DUSS')through the strategic use of infrastructure managed by Deutsche Bahn(‘the second suspected infringement').
All the more so, since the suspected infringement in that case did not consist in a typical and easily identifiable infringement of Article 101 TFEU(such as may be the case with documents which relate to hard core cartels), but in conduct whose possible anti-competitive effects can only be appreciated with the aid of an analysis of a certain complexity.
Without prejudice to any other administrative or judicial remedy, you have the right of appeal to a supervisory authority, in particular in the Member State where you reside,work or at the place of your suspected infringement, if you believe that the processing of personal data concerning you is contrary to the DSGVO.
Given the evident lack of any clear relationship between the two suspected infringements, andthe acknowledgment by the Commission that the information given to its staff regarding the second suspected infringement was not truly useful for the search for information on the first one, the inevitable conclusion, it seems to me, is that there must have been another reason behind the briefing of the Commission staff.
Without prejudice to any other administrative or judicial remedy, you have the right of appeal to a supervisory authority, in particular in the Member State where you are staying,working or the place of suspected infringement, if you consider that the processing of personal data concerning you is contrary to data protection rules.
In the event of infringement or suspected infringement of the provisions of national law transposing Titles III and IV, the competent authorities referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be those of the home Member State of the payment service provider, except for agents and branches conducted under the right of establishment where the competent authorities shall be those of the host Member State.
The main task of the NAIH is to conduct investigations in matters of data protection and freedom of information based on reports and complaints(submitted on-line, in writing or in person) andto conduct administrative proceedings ex officio for data protection(if the suspected infringement concerns many people or may cause considerable harm to interests or considerable damage).
In the event of infringement or suspected infringement of the provisions of national law transposing Titles III and IV, the competent authorities referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be those of the home Member State of the payment service provider, except for agents and branches conducted under the right of establishment where the competent authorities shall be those of the host Member State.