Examples of using Asylum request in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
If your asylum request has been rejected.
A victim 's state of vulnerability is taken into account in examining his or her asylum request.
Mr. Omufa reportedly submitted an asylum request to the Austrian authorities in September 1998.
The author arrived in Sweden in June 2003 and submitted an asylum request on 4 July 2003.
The denial of the author ' s asylum request does not disclose a violation of articles 1, 2, 3 and 6 of the Convention.
People also translate
Communication No. 463/2011(D.Y. v. Sweden) concerned a national of Uzbekistan, whose asylum request was denied.
If the decision is yes, it means your asylum request has been granted- either as a refugee or under Humanitarian Protection.
The case concerns Miloud Mannsour,a man of Algerian nationality, whose asylum request had been denied in France.
A few days after his arrival, he was informed that his asylum request was rejected, but that he could not be expelled, he would be kept in a shelter until the age of 18.
The one outstanding case ofdisappearance concerns a man of Algerian nationality whose asylum request had been denied in France.
It further points out that the complainant initially submitted his asylum request under the identity of J.B.M. and, in support of this, provided documents that proved to be false.
On 19 June 2008, written notification was given of the Government ' s intention todismiss the author ' s asylum request.
He says he's still holding outhope that Korean officials will reconsider his asylum request and then he could bring his parents here.
The issue of whether or not the complainant was to be considered credible was not decisive in the Board 's decision to deny his asylum request.
On 17 June 2004, the Migration Board rejected the complainant 's asylum request, on the grounds that his statements were not credible.
The complainant sent the Committee a copy of the decision in which the Canadian Immigrationand Refugee Board of Canada granted Mrs. V.V.J. ' s asylum request.
It further points out that the complainant initially submitted his asylum request under the identity of J.B.M. and, in support of this, provided documents that proved to be false.
The Federal Office for Migration interviewed the complainant on30 October 2009 and rejected her second asylum request on 12 November 2009.
On 1 March 2011, the Service denied her asylum request, finding no reason to expect that the Mongolian authorities would be unable to provide her with effective protection.
On 9 August 2004, the Swiss Federal Office for Refugees(ODR) refused toconsider the merits of the complainant ' s asylum request and ordered his deportation.
He claims that his asylum request was too complicated and extensive to be dealt with in the application centre procedure, which is meant to be an exception to the normal procedure.
Despite his reiterated requests for a medical examination,the Board denied his asylum request, without ordering any medical examination that might have shed light on possible sequelae of torture.
On 7 October 2002, the Federal Office for Refugees, later replaced by the Federal Officefor Migration, rejected the complainant ' s asylum request and ordered her to leave Switzerland.
The Migration Board rejected the complainant ' s asylum request on 11 July 2007 on grounds that she had not provided any information to prove her identity or her activity in the parish.
Although cognitive or physical disability is not considered as a sufficient asylum reason by the German law, it could potentially protect the individualfrom the deportation, should his/her asylum request come to rejection.
On 26 July 2002,the Danish Immigration Service rejected his asylum request, for lack of credibility, without ordering a medical examination regarding the complainant ' s torture marks.
The national authority assessing the asylum request is in a very good position to evaluate information submitted by an asylum seeker as well as to evaluate the credibility of his or her claims.
The complainant explains that he was first heard on his asylum request on 9 September 2002, and he presented the newspaper Dogus of 2 October 2000 in support of his case.
On 19 July 2005, it established that Maksudov ' s asylum request was well founded, as he could be persecuted in Uzbekistan, as a participant in and eyewitness of the Andijan events.
On 28 June 2006, the Appeals Board rejected the complainant ' s asylum request as lacking credibility and found that he had failed to substantiate that he would be at risk of persecution if forcibly returned to Turkey.