Examples of using Commentary notes in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
As the commentary notes.
The commentary notes a central disagreement within the Commission on article 48.
The commentary notes that.
The commentary notes that"[t]hese types of legal consequences will not be dealt with in part 2".
This language, as the commentary notes, is directly related to the concept of" disguised expulsion" addressed in draft article 11.
The commentary notes that the obligation of cessation might well be ascribed to the normal operation of the relevant primary rule.
Only the commentary notes that the International Court of Justice.
The commentary notes that these treaties pose potential risks to Norway ' s own highly developed system of regulations and protection, including environmental and social policies.
(d) As to the prohibition of countermeasures affecting basic human rights, the commentary notes that this has its historical origin in the prohibition of reprisals against persons protected by international humanitarian law, and was extended subsequently to cover the protections afforded individuals by non-derogable norms of human rights.
The commentary notes that the intention of the drafters of the article was clearly to keep children under 15 outside situations of armed conflict, and consequently they should not be required to perform such services.
In addition, the proposed United Nations commentary notes where the text of article 26 is identical to the text in the OECD Model Convention and indicates that the OECD commentary is fully applicable in interpreting that text.
The commentary notes that the notion of continuing wrongful acts(which is common to many national legal systems) owes its origins in international law to Triepel, and has frequently been applied by courts, especially the European Court.
(c) As to diplomatic inviolability, the commentary notes that this is confined to" those rules of diplomatic law which are designed to guarantee the physical safety and inviolability of diplomatic agents, premises, archives and documents in all circumstances, including armed conflict".
The commentary notes that the cases envisaged by paragraph(b) only occur in exceptional cases, such as revolution, armed conflict or foreign occupation where the regular authorities dissolve, are suppressed or are for the time being inoperative.
As to paragraph 2, the commentary notes its origin in the work of the 1930 Hague Codification Conference, where reference was made to such“autonomous institutions as exercise public functions of a legislative or administrative character”.
The commentary notes that this is without prejudice to the possibility that another State may also be responsible for the same wrongful conduct, e.g., if it has occurred under the control of the latter State or on its authority. Commentary, paras.(7),(11).
The commentary notes that article 91 was adopted by consensus and“correspond[s] to the general principles of law on international responsibility”: International Committee of the Red Cross, Commentary on the Additional Protocols(1987) at pp. 1051-1053.
The commentary notes that the draft statute employs the word" transfer" in order to" avoid any confusion with the notion of extradition or other forms of surrender of persons(e.g., under status-of-forces agreements) between two States." The problem of nomenclature needs to be addressed head-on at the Ad Hoc Committee.
The commentary notes that, consistently with the understanding of the term" reparation" embodied in article 36(2)(d) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, paragraph 1" lays down the general rule that full reparation should be provided so as to wipe out, to the extent possible, all the consequences of the internationally wrongful act".
The commentary notes that certain forms of assistance are independently prohibited by international law. For example, the General Assembly's Definition of Aggression defines as aggression, inter alia,“the action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State”.
The 2005 OECD Model Convention commentary notes that a further example would be that of" an enterprise that transports passengers or cargo by ships or aircraft operated in international traffic which undertakes to have those passengers or that cargo picked up in the country where the transport originates or transported or delivered in the country of destination by any mode of inland transportation operated by other enterprises".
Nonetheless, the commentary notes that" in the present stage of development of the international community of States as a whole, the recognition or establishment of a collective interest of States is still limited in application", and it is textually limited in two ways, first to express stipulations, and second to such stipulations in multilateral treaties. As to the first, there is a wide diversity of modern multilateral treaties concerned to vindicate collective interests, and to require an express stipulation seems too narrow.
The commentary noted that in certain instances of practice, it might not be clear whether what was involved by the acknowledgement was attribution of conduct or responsibility.
The commentary noted that this obligation for the organization may be considered as" implied in the obligation to make reparation".
Moreover, the commentary noted that this article would apply only in exceptional circumstances, such as when organs of administration are lacking as a result of war or natural disaster.
The commentary noted that those two categories were covered by the notion of persons connected with international organizations, but in practice that was not the case, or at least it was not sufficiently clear to avoid practical difficulties if the terms currently used in draft article 1, paragraph 2, were retained.
An alternative view supported by many developing countries recommended the adoption of the existingdraft of article 27, with an annotation or Commentary noting that countries that wished and were able to do so could expand the coverage to include other taxes than those covered in the treaty.
It was agreed to remove from the recommendation both instances of the qualification“limited” and the grounds or examples detailed in the second sentence andto place that discussion in the commentary, noting that those grounds should be limited.
(a) The Economic and Social Council, in adopting any resolution or decision addressing the update of the United Nations Model Convention, seek country positions on the Convention from Member States in order to make it clearer which countries had adopted certain interpretations,especially when the commentaries noted differing interpretations of the same provision.
Takes note also of the recommendation of the Committee that the Council, in adopting any resolution or decision addressing the update of the Convention, seek country positions on the Convention from Member States in order to make clearer which countries adopted certain interpretations,especially when the commentaries noted differing interpretations of the same provision, and requests the Secretariat to seek such country positions from Member States on a voluntary basis and to make them publicly available;