Examples of using Commentary notes in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
As the commentary notes.
Commentary: Notes on Contemporary Literature.
The commentary to article 9 stresses that it deals with the limited and precise situation of organs of a State(or international organization)which are in effect“loaned” to another State. The commentary notes(para.(6)) that cases of dependent territories such as“international protectorates” are also not covered by article 9 and this is clearly correct.
The Commentary notes as follows.
The commentary notes that self-defence usually involves the use of force, in apparent contrast with lawful countermeasures which may not, Ibid., para. 6.
The commentary notes that.
The commentary notes a central disagreement within the Commission on article 48.
This language, as the commentary notes, is directly related to the concept of"disguised expulsion" addressed in draft article 11.
The commentary notes that certain forms of assistance are independently prohibited by international law.
In addition, the proposed United Nations commentary notes where the text of article 26 is identical to the text in the OECD Model Convention and indicates that the OECD commentary is fully applicable in interpreting that text.
The commentary notes, however, that in modern cases of humanitarian intervention, the excuse of necessity has hardly ever been relied on.
Only the commentary notes that the International Court of Justice.
The commentary notes that the obligation of cessation might well be ascribed to the normal operation of the relevant primary rule.
As to the prohibition of countermeasures affecting basic human rights, the commentary notes that this has its historical origin in the prohibition of reprisals against persons protected by international humanitarian law, and was extended subsequently to cover the protections afforded individuals by non-derogable norms of human rights.
The commentary notes that the draft statute employs the word"transfer" in order to"avoid any confusion with the notion of extradition or other forms of surrender of persons(e.g., under status-of-forces agreements) between two States.
As the Commentary notes, it merely“confirms the rules laid down in the preceding articles”. Commentaries(op. cit., footnote 1), p. 49.
The commentary notes that these treaties pose potential risks to Norway's own highly developed system of regulations and protection, including environmental and social policies.
As the commentary notes, article 6, paragraph 2, is derived not from the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees but from the Organization for African Unity Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa.
The commentary notes that the intention of the drafters of the article was clearly to keep children under 15 outside situations of armed conflict, and consequently they should not be required to perform such services.
The commentary notes that article 91 was adopted by consensus and“correspond[s] to the general principles of law on international responsibility”: International Committee of the Red Cross, Commentary on the Additional Protocols(1987) at pp. 1051-1053.
The commentary notes that the cases envisaged by paragraph(b) only occur in exceptional cases, such as revolution, armed conflict or foreign occupation where the regular authorities dissolve, are suppressed or are for the time being inoperative.
As to paragraph 2, the commentary notes its origin in the work of the 1930 Hague Codification Conference, where reference was made to such“autonomous institutions as exercise public functions of a legislative or administrative character”. Ibid., para. 15, citing Basis of Discussion No. 23 of the Preparatory Committee for the 1930 Hague Conference Yearbook… 1965, vol.
Moreover, as the commentary notes, there is a principle of the independence of international organizations, different and quite possibly stronger than the position that arises when one State acts on the territory of another. For example, the principle of the immunity of an international organization from the jurisdiction of the courts of a territorial State is more extensive than the immunity of a foreign State would be.
The commentary noted that in certain instances of practice, it might not be clear whether what was involved by the acknowledgement was attribution of conduct or responsibility.
Moreover, the commentary noted that this article would apply only in exceptional circumstances, such as when organs of administration are lacking as a result of war or natural disaster.
For example, as the commentary noted, draft article 20(Self-defence) was likely to be relevant to the acts only of those international organizations that administered a territory or deployed an armed force.
The commentary noted that this obligation for the organization may be considered as"implied in the obligation to make reparation.
The commentary noted a number of examples where the idea of a threshold is reflected using“significant”,“serious”, or“substantial” as relevant criteria. Ibid., p. 260, para. 6.
The commentary noted that those two categories were covered by the notion of persons connected with international organizations, but in practice that was not the case, or at least it was not sufficiently clear to avoid practical difficulties if the terms currently used in draft article 1, paragraph 2, were retained.
An alternative view supported by many developing countries recommended the adoption of the existing draft of article 27,with an annotation or Commentary noting that countries that wished and were able to do so could expand the coverage to include other taxes than those covered in the treaty.